Build more AI video for less with Wan API.
• Wan 3.0: $0.0275/sec at 480p, 45% off official prices
• Seedance 2.0 Mini: just $0.128 for a real 4-second, 480p text-to-video test
• Seedance series: 10% off official prices
Pay as you go. Failed requests aren't charged.
Explore models and pricing: https://t.co/u4kiwCldWq
Gemini 4 Argon is live on reAPI.
60% below Google's current Standard input/output rates:
$0.80 input / $4 output per 1M tokens.
1M context. Native Gemini API + streaming.
What will you build?
https://t.co/Q8goh23nXf
Seedance 2.5 from $0.072/sec.*
Nano Banana 2.1 in 4K for $0.03/image.
Wan 3.0 from $0.036/sec at 480p.
One API key. Image + video generation. Pay as you go.
Explore the lineup on reAPI 👇
🎬 Video
• Seedance 2.5 — from $0.072/sec*
• Wan 3.0 — from $0.036/sec
🎨 Images
• Nano Banana — from $0.015/image
• Nano Banana 2 Lite — from $0.015/image
• Nano Banana 2 — from $0.028/image
• Nano Banana Pro — from $0.030/image
• Nano Banana 2.1 — from ~$0.028/image
• GPT Image 2 — from ~$0.005/image
• GPT Image 2.5 — from ~$0.002/image
• Seedream 5.0 Pro — from $0.032/image
Generate a product shot. Bring it to life with video. Build the workflow into your app.
Start here → https://t.co/WrEhGs15Bx
#AI #AIVideo
@sixugc at $0.04 per video, the budget question shifts from whether to test variations to how many you can review and actually use. the bottleneck is probably creative selection, not generation cost.
@_philschmid i usually test prompts at low resolution first, then only render the final once the composition and text are behaving. saves a lot of wasted image credits.
Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper and 5x faster than GPT Images
we tested the new Nano Banana model against GPT images with the same prompt and 5 images
numbers:
• Nano Banana 2.1: $0.044/image, rendering in 11 seconds
• GPT Images 2.5: $0.069/image, rendering in 50 seconds
Both models run via https://t.co/9gJhAnyAgA
@JacobyoungAI@pippitofficial For relatively expensive models like Seedance 2.5, I wouldn't recommend using subscription services, as they tend to be very costly. It is much more cost-effective to pay only for what you use—give https://t.co/0SnnLDRatF a try.