redandyellowcame2be

avalanche / nhl hockey
edward wormley is him
1930s - 1980s

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@DustinDHansen @ryanwhitney6 Well, I do know this certainly isn’t covered

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@rayizdamngued @espn Show me where Freddy covered it. Not even a canes fan but this was a bad call. Freddy never had to covered and skater is allowed to poke at a lose puck

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@ReichelRadio https://t.co/I26JHpIosA

Id challenge too. Puck was never covered

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@nhl_review Never covered

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@MolitorisNick I’d challenge that all day. That should have counted. Terrible call. Puck was never covered and skater is allowed to poke puck when lose

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@6ErikJohnson @ryanwhitney6 I’d challenge too. It’s a good goal EJ. Puck was never covered and attacker has every right to poke at it.

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@DustinDHansen @ryanwhitney6 Seems like a good goal to me

[Daily Faceoff @DailyFaceoff]

Should this have counted?

🎥: Sportsnet

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@DustinDHansen @ryanwhitney6 Honestly, I thought it was a good goal. Puck was never covered

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@DailyFaceoff Not a fan of either team, but not sure how this wasn’t called a goal. Puck was never covered

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@Gr8adventurePNW @matt_gannon_ That’s why he said “we” didn’t get it right

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@Austinmulder95 @TopTierPucks @FriedgeHNIC Hahahah.

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@stewiethedawgg @SamLenSports Stars couldn’t score or do anything 5v5 in playoffs other than Robo

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@BLGlueGuy @ZachWolchuk Exactly what Avs fans said about Mikko when he was asking for 14mil from Colorado

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@SportsSturm 12.65

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@Mcgarry94 @NWolfe94577 @ChampRDS No one wants to see that though. Tom would get absolutely worked against any top boxer. Why wouldn’t we want to see the best fight the best in boxing? This is boxing fuck up. They just can’t get out of their own way. It’s simple. HAVE THE BEST BOXERS FIGHT EACHOTHER. the end

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@edgs1803 @Tyler_Polumbus Cooper ain’t leaving Tampa

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

@rodjob21 @evanrawal Exactly

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

I hate troubas hits a few years ago. I couldn’t understand how the NHL didn’t punish the exploding up like that. But if they are going to keep it consistent….

I was just thinking about how he hasn’t had a single one of those since the trade. The dude was out there ruining careers. Has he had one? Can’t think of one

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

He absolutely did not.

The Panarin turnover was a really bad look in an important game. He also completely lost his man the game or two before resulting in a goal. Also in an important game.

I stand by my assessment. You live by the sword you have to die by it too. You trolled too hard and it cost him.

[redandyellowcame2be @redandyellowca1]

Obviously more severe and that’s exactly why I think Evan’s and Big Z are very different. The difference why it wouldn’t be penalized in the NHL. Also, in the Z hit you can see the head move independently from the body quite severely. In Evan’s hit, that doesn’t occur.

I just don’t see this being a penalty in the NHL. I keep going back to Trouba, there’s much more “main’ head contact in those and he always explodes upwards too.