Redbeard

Omnivert, critical thinker, awake, doesn't march in line, knows history, does look back, realist

[Redbeard @RedbeardsMind]

De Nederlandse burger is verworden tot een stel kikkers welke zich langzaam laat koken zonder het door te hebben.

#coronapas #QRsamenleving #QRcode #stekeblind #coronamaatregelen

[Daniel Schatz @drdanielschatz]

Navi Pillay’s record should raise far more than serious questions about the Nobel Committee’s judgment. It should disqualify her as a recipient of the peace prize.

🔴 When a car bomb struck Denmark’s embassy in Pakistan after Danish newspapers republished the Muhammad cartoons, former Danish foreign minister Per Stig Møller says Pillay’s advice was not to defend freedom of expression, but to introduce censorship.

🔴 Her response to Charlie Hebdo was no better. She called the magazine “doubly irresponsible” for publishing Muhammad cartoons, described them as “malicious and deliberately provocative,” and said she “fully understands why people wish to protest strongly.” In other words, when Islamists answer speech with threats and murder, Pillay’s instinct is to rebuke those exercising free speech rather than the extremists.

🔴 In 2022, Pillay defended fellow UN commissioner Miloon Kothari after he invoked the antisemitic trope of a “Jewish lobby” controlling social media and questioned Israel’s UN membership. Kothari later apologised. A planned event honouring Pillay at Berlin City Hall was cancelled after the mayor withdrew support.

🔴 In 2010, she declined to attend the Nobel ceremony for the imprisoned Chinese democracy campaigner Liu Xiaobo, citing a low-level scheduling conflict in Geneva, as Beijing pressured foreign officials to boycott the event.

🔴 At the antisemitic Durban II conference in 2009, Pillay remained seated while Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivered his tirade against Israel and Western delegations walked out. She condemned the speech afterwards—but later admitted that she had been “naive” about Ahmadinejad.

🔴 And a review of her first two years as UN human-rights chief found no public statements by Pillay on human rights abuses in dictatorships as Cuba, North Korea, Eritrea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan or Belarus.

This is the track record on which the Nobel Committee—and a chorus of commentators around the world—now celebrate this activist as a champion of human rights, freedom and peace. Despicable.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

I read that Stephen Gray, the ex-copper who made an excellent apparent-causal joke about bacon has been
fined because his joke was 'grossly offensive'

I think that what a lot of English people would find 'grossly offensive' is the idea of a grown man having sexual intercourse with a nine year old girl

But maybe criticising this would be blasphemy ?

On the whole, I think that the provincial judge laying down this law, Steven Hood, may come from a different part of England from me

[Mossad Customer Support @LionOfJudahX]

Kuwaiti guy tells the truth they never want you to hear 🔥
Palestinians his family helped find jobs & sheltered…
…turned around and informed on Kuwaitis to Saddam during the invasion.
Kuwait’s response?
Deported 330,000 of them.
No ICC. No UN emergency sessions. No “genocide” marches.

Just: “Get out. We don’t want to see you again.”

Israel never did that.
And somehow Israel is the villain.
Double standards so loud you can hear them from space. 🇮🇱

[Henrik Dahl @SociologenHD]

In an interview with the Danish newspaper Berlingske, Denmark’s former foreign minister Per Stig Møller recounts a highly compromising story about the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Navi Pillay.

In 2008, when Denmark faced problems in Pakistan (a car bomb exploded outside the embassy) because of the Muhammad cartoons, Denmark turned to the UN - including the then High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay.

On that occasion Pillay was completely dismissive of supporting Denmark. Her only recommendation to the foreign minister was to introduce censorship. That, she said, would prevent the problem in the future.

I find it shocking that an opponent of freedom of speech can be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

[Sander Sassen @SanderSassen]

Could @NobelPrize perhaps explain why they award the Peace Prize to Navi Pillay when, as UN High Commissioner, her office handed the names of more than 50 dissidents, including Uyghurs, to Chinese authorities, after which families testified under oath to intimidation, arbitrary detention, torture, disappearance and deaths in camps?

UN whistleblower Emma Reilly, who worked under Pillay, states she warned of the risk and was dismissed while staff who transmitted the names were promoted. This makes Pillay at least partly responsible of what happened to these people.

She later chaired the UN commission that in 2025 found Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, largely from public statements and perceived wartime conduct from news reports. Furthermore records show repeated statements focused on Israel alongside silence on many of the world’s most repressive regimes, Iran for example.

The committee’s own citation praises her ‘moral compass’, which makes the committee’s own judgment highly questionable as they completely failed to address these documented contradictions.

[Loay Alshareef لؤي الشريف @lalshareef]

❌ The Flydubai co-pilot was radicalized in Qandahar, Afghanistan.

✅ The Flydubai co-pilot was radicalized in Melbourne, Australia by a mosque linked to the Muslim Brotherhood organization.

Let that sink in.

People of Australia, wake up 🙏🏼♥️

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

This is spot on.

[Amjad Taha أمجد طه @amjadt25]

Europe finally said it out loud. On Thursday the European Parliament voted 381 to 167 asking the Council to put Muslim Brotherhood linked entities and individuals on the EU terrorist list where the legal criteria are met, and to look past the official structures at the front organisations, financial networks and youth groups around them, it also wants a full account of EU money that reached Brotherhood associates and FEMYSO kept out of EU events.

It is a resolution, not a ban yet, so the decision now sits with the 27 governments. 167 MEPs voted against it. Ask yourself why.

BTW, the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in the UAE.

[Bart Nijman @BartNijman]

"...ik wens iedereen die denkt dat het wel zal meevallen met de agressie van de islam veel sterkte..." (Pim Fortuyn, 2001)

[Bridgett Fertig @LightOnLiberty]

Why don't they teach us THIS in school?!

"3/4 of the original Christian world was conquered by Islam through extreme violence!"

"By the 1600s, Islam had covered MORE of the Earth's surface than the Roman Empire did at its peak.

During that war, during that expansion, 280 million people died!"

He means 280 million Christians were EXECUTED by Muslims for following Jesus and we're STILL being hunted down and murdered by these satanic savages today in our own streets.

And the democrat party gave them asylum while blue state governors harbor and protect them.

Vote red all the way down the ballot.

[Le Crapaud @Le_Crapaud47]

"Friends" version communiste

« Engueulade au Central Perk »

[Nick Matau @nick_matau]

This is Raith Al-Tamimi, an Iraqi living in the UK, saying out loud what many across the Arab world think but can’t openly say.

His perspective on Israel’s wars since October 7 is worth hearing.

Watch this.

[Ron Arts @raarts]

Veel reacties: het zullen de moslims wel zijn. Veel tegenwerpingen: dit geldt voor alle geloven, ook het christelijke. Maar wie leest nu zelf het rapport? Nou, ik.

Hieronder de overzichtstabel uit het rapport van de UvA. Let wel, dit zegt niets over de groei/krimp, alleen over het nu. Quote uit het rapport: "In de analyses die ervoor controleren hoe religieus iemand is, vinden we daarnaast dat moslims ten opzichte van niet-gelovigen op vijf van de acht dimensies minder positief staan ten opzichte van vrouwenemancipatie dan niet-gelovigen; geen vergelijkbare relatie wordt gevonden voor andere religies ten opzichte van niet-gelovigen."

Ik lees dit als: moslims staan minder positief tegenover vrouwenemancipatie dan andere gelovigen die net zo religieus zijn.

Enersijds zal dit niemand verbazen, maar anderzijds is het toch een beetje taboe om te zeggen.

[Maaike van Charante @Repelsteeltje21]

Wanneer je geen flauw benul hebt van wat je aan het doen bent, maar toch wilt DEUGEN.
Onze D66-regering🤡 heeft o.a. het Druzendorp Majdal Shams op de sanctielijst gezet.🤦‍♂️
Hadden ze maar geen foute postcode moeten hebben.

[Iwan Dienjes @iwandienjes]

RTL meldt dat 15,8 procent van de Nederlanders het slaan van een vrouw niet onder alle omstandigheden afwijst. Staatssecretaris Judith Tielen noemt dat „schrikbarend”. Terecht.

Weet u wat ook schrikbarend is?

Wat RTL niet vertelt: de gebruikte World Values Survey stelde óók deze vragen:

Q141: Mag een man zijn vrouw slaan?
Q249: Tot welke religie behoort u? Met moslim als afzonderlijke categorie.
Q123–128: Hoe belangrijk is God, hoe vaak bidt u en hoe religieus bent u?
Q231–233: Waar zijn u en uw ouders geboren?
Q250: Wat is uw etnische achtergrond?

De officiële UvA-samenvatting is vervolgens glashelder:

“Daarnaast zijn moslims gemiddeld traditioneler dan niet-religieuzen, ook als rekening wordt gehouden met hoe belangrijk religie voor iemand is.”

De UvA voegt eraan toe dat dit verschil bij andere religies niet werd gevonden.

RTL noemt wél leeftijd, geldzorgen en de manosfeer. Maar religie, herkomst en etniciteit: nul woorden.

De uitslag is „schrikbarend”. De onderzoeksbevinding over moslims blijkbaar vooral ongemakkelijk.

Dat is geen gebrek aan gegevens. Dat is journalistieke selectie: alle vragen stellen, alleen de comfortabele antwoorden publiceren.

#Vrouwenrechten #veiligheid

https://t.co/YTKprNOqIn

https://t.co/fAe4gXnCeV

[Buck Angel Transsexual @BuckAngel]

Do not forget I am a transsexual who had a civil discourse with Charlie Kirk. The trans cult never wants to build bridges or have conversations.
You are missed #charliekirk 🥲

[Shermin Amiri @SherminAmiri]

De denkfout is dat kerst en iftar als hetzelfde worden behandeld. Kerst behoort tot de collectieve cultuur en wordt door miljoenen Nederlanders volstrekt seculier gevierd. Hun kerstlunch vereist geen gebed of Bijbellezing. Een iftar ontleent haar betekenis daarentegen rechtstreeks aan de islam en aan islamitische rituelen rond de ramadan. Het is geen gewone maaltijd.

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

A compilation of the Islamic Republic mass executing their own people.

It would be a shame if this went viral.

[יוסף חדאד - Yoseph Haddad @YosephHaddad]

Unlike @AbdulElSayed, I’m an Arab who is actually from Israel. My family lived through the establishment of the state of Israel and what he calls the “Nakba.” The Holocaust was nothing like the events of the “Nakba” where my grandfather was told to flee by Arab leaders (not Jews) so the Arabs could “defeat the Jews.” He refused, and all the Arab residents who stayed were given citizenship. Those who fled, a large number by choice, were not permitted to return, as often happens in war. That is a catastrophe, a “nakba” of their own making. But there was no choice in the Holocaust, there was no citizenship for those who stayed. You are intentionally comparing a war and a genocide. They are not the same.

Your vile attempt to co-opt the largest massacre of the Jewish people in history, the systematic murder of six million people simply because they were Jews, for your own dystopian pro-terror Muslim Brotherhood agenda is despicable. I see through you Abdul. You may be able to fool Western Americans with your garbage, but we know who you really are.

یا کذاب ابن کذاب

[Nick Matau @nick_matau]

This one hurts the pro palis screaming "LOOK AT THE NATIONS THAT WALKED OUT ON NETANYAHU"