L'université de McGill, au Canada, a établi une échelle des douleurs les plus intenses chez l'être humain, de la plus tolérable (10) à la plus insupportable (01):
10. Névralgie du trijumeau
09. Migraine
08. Colique néphrétique
07. Fibromyalgie
06. Polyarthrite rhumatoïde
⬇️
@JJDay25728766@ReneDuba@RepGregLandsman Except my name change was and is legal and is on every single document I have except my birth certificate, but suddenly that's inadequate. I have had this name longer than my maiden name. I shouldn't have to provide more paperwork to prove my legal identity than anyone else.
@RTNCPROUD@RepGregLandsman You're being disingenuous. I LEGALLY changed my name on my marriage 40 years ago and all of my ID reflects that. And none of it means anything to this bill. Yes, I can produce my marriage license etc. but I did this LEGALLY years ago and they just decided to rescind all of that.
@raidersfan1979@RepGregLandsman Voter ID already exists - when you register to vote, you get a card showing your registration. This is both nonsense and just piling on more bullcrap so people have a more tedious time digging out of it in hopes they won't bother.
@imtherocketdude@Justachrisp@AskPerplexity@lybrti@RepJasmine@grok Sure thing, nobody is elderly or lost their documents in a fire or other disaster or any number of other potential circumstances. And if they did, they don't deserve to vote, right? It's a privilege, not like a right that's enshrined in the Constitution. /s
@imtherocketdude@Justachrisp@AskPerplexity@lybrti@RepJasmine@grok The point is that it's not about how easy it is to change your name. It's about requiring people who have already legally done so to jump through extra hoops and spend money to prove something they did according to existing laws.
@MtuwaMaoni@RepJasmine When you buy alcohol, do you have to produce your birth certificate and any documentation regarding your name change such as a marriage license or passport along with your current ID?
@currermell@RepJasmine And your birth certificate, provided everything is notarized and the person registering you is willing to accept your documents, since there is no national standard for what they should look like. Also, it's disingenuous to pretend we all carry our marriage certificates.
@monipridragon12@RepJasmine Driver's license is not valid ID in this case. Neither is a social security card, which you must be a citizen to get and would reflect a married name. Neither is a Real ID, which requires all of the same documentation as a passport.
@Rlenks@Aku_700@RepJasmine Social security cards also not valid. Real ID, which requires the same documentation as a passport, is not valid. Passports are expensive and take months to get right now. The problem is bigger than who gets a driver's license.
@imtherocketdude@AskPerplexity@lybrti@RepJasmine@grok So in a case where a married woman who shares her husband's name needs register to vote, she must produce/purchase an array of specific documents or purchase a passport in order to do so, even when other valid ID is available.
@imtherocketdude@AskPerplexity@lybrti@RepJasmine@grok That part is easy, yes. I changed my name 40 years ago when I married. The problem with the SAVE act is that it makes most forms of ID inadequate when registering to vote, including a Real ID which requires the same documentation as a passport and is still not valid. 1/2
@bulldognights @Kissmyazz24@corruptGOP99@DoomScroling No state should be able to enact laws that result in the death of its citizens. A fetus is not a citizen. Nor is its life more important than the one who is carrying it.