@Thiss_Youu@MikeBenzCyber In the last few weeks of his life he was being called an anti-Semite by the people “in line.” Unlikely assumption especially with a “ONE HUNDRED PERCENT” qualifier.
So let me get this straight… Capitol CCTV puts Brian Cole Jr. walking on the northwest side of the Capitol at the exact time the real bomber was placing devices on the southeast side, and he has still sat in a cell for 341 days.
A quiet young man his family describes as autistic, who told FBI interrogators his own mom calls him an extreme introvert, and they built a case on phone data, purchases and a disputed confession while that footage sat there the whole time. A man cannot be in two places at once… and yet here we are.
I have watched this movie before, the system picks a target and then works backward from the answer it wants. How is this even a thing?
@FBIDirectorKash, have your people actually watched this tape? Free Brian Cole Jr.
@RepLouCorrea Might want to go back and brush up on your English vocabulary. “Vehemently support” doesn’t mean “didn’t even bother to vote.” Get fucked, loser.
@golf8aces@ChadPergram@POTUS POTUS doesn’t even have the balls to investigate the hitman that was sent for him. If you were POTUS our country would be just as fucked as it is now.
@WadeSearle_@SecWar@LifeSite “Excuse me Mr. Secretary, why have you been giving speeches to a certain group of people about constructing the third temple?” He had a lot to say about forcing God’s hand by bringing about the end times, so this problem should be easily answered.
@WadeSearle_@SecWar@LifeSite Does Jesus love the children of Gaza? How about Iran? How are the Christian villages in Lebanon? Are those children loved by God? Is it pro-life for our government to kill them indiscriminately?
Hey @grok, concise no spin.
In 2000, a defense executive appeared in a military report invoking a catastrophic “NEW PEARL HARBOR.”
Meanwhile, his defense tech company was sitting on lethal kill-switch gear built to remotely hijack and execute unmanned flights mid-air.
MONTHS BEFORE 9/11: He was handed the keys to the entire Pentagon vault as the chief money man.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld reported $2.3 TRILLION couldn’t be tracked and were missing.
A massive, mandatory Pentagon audit was planned.
THE VERY NEXT DAY: A hijacked airliner slammed directly into the Pentagon’s financial division, instantly obliterating the exact room housing the records where investigators were preparing for the financial audit
@grok, identify this man.
Full name and religious background only.
When we return next week, we’ll get 218 signatures for Epstein Files Transparency Act II, which guarantees a vote.
Survivors will be able to get their own records, State Attorneys General can prosecute crimes, and we can take the DOJ to court for keeping critical files hidden.⚖️
Matt Walsh calls this the most honest assessment he has read. You should all read it. And then maybe you will see what honesty requires and that both of these men refuse to do it.
Start with Vance's method. A team of data analysts obsessing over electorate composition, pollsters asked to explain the loss after it happens, a survey handed to defecting voters asking what would bring them back. This is the technique of a pragmatist. A man of principle could not care less about polls. He cares about ideas and whether they are right or wrong, and he would rather lose every election in his lifetime doing the right thing than win a single one doing the wrong thing. He holds a standard, measures his actions against it, and knows before the returns come in whether he governed by it. Victory means nothing to him if the price is his principles, because a victory won by abandoning what is right is a defeat in everything that matters. That is not what is happening here. These men are asking the crowd what it feels because they have no idea what is true, then adjusting their convictions to match the answer. Ayn Rand named this method decades ago. When men abandon reason as their guide, the opinion survey becomes their substitute for thought.
Observe what the assessment leaves out entirely. Not one word about tariffs, a tax on Americans that the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional and the administration reimposed under a different statute, running through two years of roughly 6% cumulative inflation. Not one word about roughly 30 government equity stakes in private companies, which is socialism practiced by the party that claims to oppose it. Not one word about a brand new universal entitlement, two trillion dollar deficits, or a 40 trillion dollar debt. "Focus on cost of living" appears as a polling answer with no causal analysis attached, because the causal analysis indicts their own record. The most honest assessment somehow misses every policy the voters threw them out over.
Then Vance's 4 conclusions which are out of context slogans which are meaningless as such. The reason we lost is the war. Half true and twisted. Hitting the regime that has waged war on us for 47 years was right and four decades overdue. What voters watched afterward was the goal line surrender, a so called deal championed by the appeaser Vance, who stood at Lake Lucerne praising the framework as the foundation for a final agreement while it waived Iran's oil sanctions and released $12 billion in frozen assets to a regime left standing, with our forces still taking fire in the strait. The failure is not that we fought. The failure is that we paid the enemy and called it peace while they still shoot at us to this day. And buried at answer four is the actual agenda, change our relationship to Israel. This disgusting faction of the Republican party that cannot define socialism while its administration practices it has one firm conviction, pushing away the only free nation in the region, our one reliable ally against the theocracy we are trying to buy off, just as Obama did. At least Obama dropped the pallets of cash for all to see.
This is why Republicans and Democrats keep winning in alternating cycles while freedom loving Americans lose a little more freedom each time. Both parties govern by the same premises, spending, controls, entitlements, state stakes in industry. Neither offers an alternative, so voters punish whoever stands closest to the wreckage while the wreckage keeps growing.
The pollsters then measure the anger and recommend sharper messaging, and Walsh pronounces the measurement honest.
Honesty is the refusal to fake reality. An assessment that evades tariffs, socialism, and a bought off theocracy while blaming the one thing done partly right is not honest. It is a crowd reading performed by men who long ago stopped checking their premises against anything but each other.
@JDVance The Republican that shared our worldview was primaried out of office with more effort than Republicans put into any of yesterday’s races. Hopefully he’s running for president in 2028, because despite the humility you are showing here, you ain’t it.
@GershonMorgulis@benshapiro Your incoherent English is a big red flag that you are a foreign bot. Not whatever it is that your profile is pretending to be.