There is no easy solution for AI plagiarism. The modus operandi of the journals will have to change, One possibility is that refereeing not be done as now by reading and commenting on the article but by arranging a video conversation between the referees and the author(s). In a conversation, it would become clear if the article is an AI plagiarism or is genuine.
Generally speaking, we have to move to oral examinations.
the universities gave up and just don't think it's cheating any more.
At UoA, any take-home assessment can now be done using LLMs in a totally unrestricted way.
Genuinely, can someone give me the steel man version of the rationale behind the new โgive everyone AIโ university strategy? What is the theory of the case here? Do universities think itโs sustainable to ask students to pay over $90k per year to cheat their way through college?
starting to get very excited for WC: right in the middle of inter-semester break, great viewing times in NZ, my beautiful ๐ฟ๐ฆ boys playing in the first game, vague feeling that Trump could get got for real right in the middle of it all...
โAI is demoralizing.โ
A Princeton Professor says he kept wondering this semester (while lecturing) if his students would be better off learning from Claude:
@RadishHarmers not really sure how you deal with it, just seems like it would be more trouble than it's worth given the sheer volume.
but, where else to post funny quips to 1000s of people I suppose...
Fascinating to watch these blowhards, like gorillas with that box toy with differently shaped holes, work through the puzzle: Trump decisively won the war, but Iran's going to get some big things it wants...?