Yahweh

God
King
Judge
Divine Council

Every Statement, Post and Reply is divine revelation and must be accepted as absolute.

Ha-Satan is Watching!

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

https://t.co/1KBtipEQaF

See how the gas crisis is affecting car ownership

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@SireRottweiler Standing up for POC is the white mans way of throwing out POC

Gotcha

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@NFL @USAFootball @Olympics @NFLFLAG He donated how much per woman he abused?

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@briebriejoy

I have an odd request -

Please focus on textual media over audio-visual media.

It’s impossible for me to concentrate on your message/arguments during your videos, when I get distracted by perfection.

My distraction is at its worst during the moments you witness your debate opponent invalidating their own argument, and you light up with a big smile, in a state of disbelief, ready to pounce and embarrass them.

Maybe I was wrong about being distracted.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@trouble_man90 Suppressed or Ignored?

[Ha-Satan @stacula215]

First they came for the Palestinians and I said nothing.

Next they came for the Christians and I said nothing.

Later they came for the Atheists and I said nothing.

Ultimately they came for America and I said nothing.

Now they are knocking on my door.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@trouble_man90 Leftists don’t speak for liberals, nor do they believe, liberals are reflective at anything.

YAHWEH LIAR INDEX: Pants on 🔥

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@trouble_man90

I thought Obama and Biden were responsible for Fetterman getting elected.

[Tim @trouble_man90]

@HCTrudo Winning in blue districts is not a flex. Fetterman acted like Bernie didn’t exist and brought in Biden and Obama to close out his race.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

So you hate leftists, right-wingers and love the word retard, which is only hated by liberals.

The only allegiance you seem to have is to AIPAC (since posting AIPAC tracker is proof of retardation) and Jill Biden, yet you attack Yahweh, King of Israel, Jews and Judge of the Divine Council, by calling him a retard.

You are special and belong on the Council.

I will have Ha-Satan contact you.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

Let’s be real.

In red states, questioning if their redistricting efforts are really racism or a pure political power play is valid.

It’s impossible to separate Southern Dem Cities/districts from race but that doesn’t mean the decisions are based on race.

But that also doesn’t mean they’re not.

You can’t redistrict in the South to favor Republicans without minorities/blacks being affected.

It’s impossible.

Democrats can’t redistrict in the blue states and have opponents complain it’s racially based.

Thats impossible.

Even though some Dems do claim their redistricting efforts in blue states are based on red states redistricting based on race. Those statements could invalidate all their efforts by Supreme Court if someone made that argument and US SC wanted to be diabolical.

Supreme Court already upheld Californias redistricting plan so they aren’t being 100% biased but they are definitely more biased than being a neutral party, which is the ideal stance on any issue, but that would be naive at this point.

Virginia redistricting probably should have been denied by the State Supreme Court due to their amendment rule.

They believe that general
Assembly must vote on it first (passes), then have a general election where every voter knows
What’s at stake when electing the general assembly, then after the general election, the new assembly votes on it again.

Since 1.3 million (40% of all votes) people already (early) voted for the 2025 general election before the general assembly voted on it, those 1.3 million weren’t aware before casting their vote what was at stake.

Democrats judges argued that only Election Day counts and too bad for the 1.3 million who voted that didn’t know what was at stake.

The Virginia state SC was shady that they allowed the referendum to occur, when they know that they are going to void it due to the previous reason.

The four justices hoped referendum failed and the issue would be moot without them getting the blame. IMO, once it passed they made the ruling they knew they were going to make.

The wildcard is the language of the referendum, which is still in VA SC pocket, if US SC overrules VA SC election voting issue, the State SC could still strike it down based on the language by hearing the language lawsuit immediately.

The language in the referendum is a separate lawsuit but was referenced in judges opinion but not as a factor in this decision. So a different hearing would create a new opportunity to strike it down again.

Here is the language:

Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

“Restore fairness in the upcoming elections” is a crazy statement to put on a state bill.

It’s not a neutral statement by any means, and turns the referendum into a leading question that could influence the voter’s vote.

So if the case is heard, it’s probably going to be ruled as non-constitutional since VA constitution states that statutes require NEUTRAL, plain-English explanation.

The referendum question isn’t neutral.

And the US Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to overturn the state Supreme Court if they make a ruling on the ballot text language issue.

So that’s game, set, match!

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

Let’s be real.

In red states, questioning if their redistricting efforts are really racism or a pure political power play is valid.

It’s impossible to separate Southern Dem Cities/districts from race but that doesn’t mean the decisions are based on race.

But that also doesn’t mean they’re not.

You can’t redistrict in the South to favor Republicans without minorities/blacks being affected.

It’s impossible.

Democrats can’t redistrict in the blue states and have opponents complain it’s racially based.

Thats impossible.

Even though some Dems do claim their redistricting efforts in blue states are based on red states redistricting based on race. Those statements could invalidate all their efforts by Supreme Court if someone made that argument and US SC wanted to be diabolical.

Supreme Court already upheld Californias redistricting plan so they aren’t being 100% biased but they are definitely more biased than being a neutral party, which is the ideal stance on any issue, but that would be naive at this point.

Virginia redistricting probably should have been denied by the State Supreme Court due to their amendment rule.

They believe that general
Assembly must vote on it first (passes), then have a general election where every voter knows
What’s at stake when electing the general assembly, then after the general election, the new assembly votes on it again.

Since 1.3 million (40% of all votes) people already (early) voted for the 2025 general election before the general assembly voted on it, those 1.3 million weren’t aware before casting their vote what was at stake.

Democrats judges argued that only Election Day counts and too bad for the 1.3 million who voted that didn’t know what was at stake.

The Virginia state SC was shady that they allowed the referendum to occur, when they know that they are going to void it due to the previous reason.

The four justices hoped referendum failed and the issue would be moot without them getting the blame. IMO, once it passed they made the ruling they knew they were going to make.

The wildcard is the language of the referendum, which is still in VA SC pocket, if US SC overrules VA SC election voting issue, the State SC could still strike it down based on the language by hearing the language lawsuit immediately.

The language in the referendum is a separate lawsuit but was referenced in judges opinion but not as a factor in this decision. So a different hearing would create a new opportunity to strike it down again.

Here is the language:

Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?

“Restore fairness in the upcoming elections” is a crazy statement to put on a state bill.

It’s not a neutral statement by any means, and turns the referendum into a leading question that could influence the voter’s vote.

So if the case is heard, it’s probably going to be ruled as non-constitutional since VA constitution states that statutes require NEUTRAL, plain-English explanation.

The referendum question isn’t neutral.

And the US Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to overturn the state Supreme Court if they make a ruling on the ballot text language issue.

So that’s game, set, match!

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

You cheered Virginia going from 6-5 to 10-1 but cried when it went back to 6-5.

Wasting $18 million and thousands of man-hours to crush the souls of liberals nationally was a stroke of genius.

Southern Blacks could vote Republican to make their vote count.

Or move to blue states where their vote would count and solidify senate seats, governor admins and guarantee electoral votes for President.

Or in 2016, Blacks could have voted, instead of unconditionally surrendering their rights for the next 44 years.

If unconditionally surrendered is too strong, it’s like they were waiting on the sidelines expecting someone else to show up and fight for their rights for them.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

Hi I’m one of the people responsible for blacks losing their rights in 2026.

Tell you how I did it.

I lived in one of the 3 blue-wall states that cost Hillary the election in 2016.

Vote for Bernie Sanders in Primary.

In response to you rigging the primaries

I convinced blacks to decrease their voter turnout by 7%, or 1.2 million votes in 2016 compared to 2012 levels. .which was the largest decline on record for blacks, and their first decline in 20 years.

Voted for Jill Stein in general election.

Between my ONE Jill Stein vote and the 1.2 million blacks passing on voting, we made sure the democrats lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, making The Apprentice -> The President

Trump put 3 SC Justice on the Court, and in 2026, they finished what they started in 2013.

The Butterfly Effect of your “rigging” 2016 primaries led to the unconditional surrender of Black voting rights.

But the story isn’t over, the sequel is coming in 2060.

Spoiler alert: I won’t vote Bernie or Stein in 2060.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

Hi I’m one of the people responsible for blacks losing their rights in 2026.

Tell you how I did it.

I lived in one of the 3 blue-wall states that cost Hillary the election in 2016.

Vote for Bernie Sanders in Primary.

In response to you rigging the primaries

I convinced blacks to decrease their voter turnout by 7%, or 1.2 million votes in 2016 compared to 2012 levels. .which was the largest decline on record for blacks, and their first decline in 20 years.

Voted for Jill Stein in general election.

Between my ONE Jill Stein vote and the 1.2 million blacks passing on voting, we made sure the democrats lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, making The Apprentice -> The President

Trump put 3 SC Justice on the Court, and in 2026, they finished what they started in 2013.

The Butterfly Effect of your “rigging” 2016 primaries led to the unconditional surrender of Black voting rights.

But the story isn’t over, the sequel is coming in 2060.

Spoiler alert: I won’t vote Bernie or Stein in 2060.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@BookerGWash The fact that the Democratic Party has a Confederate and Jim Crow history is so crazy.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@LeftyWinter Interesting Kamala is 4th at 12% after Establishment Dem Polls had her at 50%

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@LeftyWinter This is just Villian of the Week!

Collins switched for Platner race and Fetterman stepped in and took her place.

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@BookerGWash We want Platner!

We love Platner!

Platner for Senate 2026!

Platner for President 2028 or 2032!

Focus on black rights being reinstated on 2060 before we have to blame black voters in 2060 like we did in 2016 and 2024, “We told you!”

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@trouble_man90 Hardest working person in DC!

[Yahweh @refsandpointers]

@trouble_man90 Such a fucking liar.

May 7th, Fetterman wrote his editorial about being at odds with Dem party, speculation surged about switching to independent or Republican.

That chart flipped on May 7th.

Facts matter, your feels and vibes don’t.