If you look at the evidence, and ignore “Legal experts” like @tariqnasheed, then this case was EASY.
The Karmelo Anthony murder outcome was a layup for the jurors.
Stop looking at race, instead look at the evidence.
"He's got like the best playlist, smoking a blunt, got the sneakers in the back, I'm like you know what... I f*ck with this guy"
@senortilt giving @Dragon88Tv his flowers 🐉
@ItIsHoeMath A simplified graphic short descriptions of the levels. Post it in the comments of a video of people fighting in a fast food restaurant. Comment "some real level 1 creatures". An arrow pointing to level 4 saying most people are here. People want to be better than most.
The last "low" level of consciousness, level 6, is all about putting people together so that they can all share and learn from each other. This is motivated by the feeling of being an infinite self who could learn or do anything if only you had the right surroundings.
The first "high" level of consciousness, level 7, is all about putting people where they observably produce good results. This is motivated by the realization that while potential is always unlimited, actualization is always limited, and it is limited specifically by the characteristics of the individual.
At level 4, "you are like us or you don't belong." You may recognize this from the behavior of pretty much everyone who says they're liberal.
At level 5, "you figure out where you belong." You may recognize this from asking your Boomer parents what to do with your life.
At level 6, "everybody belongs." You may recognize this from Beatles songs and Captain Planet cartoons.
At level 7, "everybody belongs where they fit best." And unfortunately for our gay, weak, feminine culture, some people fit best in prison or an electric chair, and in the case of mass immigration, well... I won't say it. But they certainly don't belong on welfare. And the number of people who currently are where they don't fit has dramatically risen over the last 20 years.
People at level 6 hate it when I say this because "everybody belongs." They have not figured out boundaries yet.
Liberals at level 4 hate it when I say this because "you are not like us; you don't belong because you don't think everyone belongs." They learned this from level 6 being the dominant cultural force over the last 80 years. They are not smart enough to figure out that we do think everyone belongs, we just don't think everyone belongs everywhere all the time. Which is a pretty silly belief if you think about it.
We have a short time to get normies to understand why level 7 is better.
I had my first meeting today with my social change group on discord. It's actually off to a surprisingly good start. The leader of the meeting presented structured ideas for changing culture. I provided direction.
I don't know where I'm going to find the time and energy to do this, but a coordinated, structured, memetic campaign is the last hope before things get ugly.
I mean, things are going to get ugly anyway. But we could minimize the ugliness, maybe.
Gotta get through to those normies.
Imagine you are a dental hygienist and live in Sweden..
You are employed to help “migrant children” with their dental issues.
As part of your job you examine the wisdom teeth development of the kids and you notice that 80% of those “kids” have fully formed wisdom teeth, implying they are not kids at all but adults older than the age of 18.
You tell the Swedish Migration Agency and they advise you to put it in writing.
When you send exact details, with examples of specific patients you are suspended, investigated and fired for disclosing private information relating to patients.
This happened to Bernt Herlitz in 2017.
When he appealed the unfair dismissal he ultimately lost and was fined about $50,000.
He and his family faced financial hardship and almost lost their home, until some generous benefactors raised money for him. Bernt remains unemployed today, despite staff shortages for dentists in his area in Gotland.
At the time, Sweden scoffed at the tests and claimed they were “discriminatory” but since then they have quietly brought in mass dental testing, for those whose age is in doubt, by the National Board of Forensic Medicine.
Bernt deserves a medal. Not vilification and unemployment.
@jasonwhitlock Yes! And black police officer (Eric Reynolds) who arrested them only learned of jogger because of them. It was a night of "Wilding" (waves of wild crimes in Central Park by local teens) and they were apprehended initially for other crimes. A minority-majority jury convicted them
Pensaba que la pechuga de pollo era la reina absoluta de la proteína.
La comía casi todos los días.
Hasta que me pregunté:
¿Realmente es el alimento con más proteína que podemos encontrar?
Ranking de alimentos ricos en proteína (por cada 100 g):
10. Lomo de cerdo → 21 g
9. Salmón → 22 g
8. Carne magra de res → 22 g
7. Atún fresco → 23 g
6. Pechuga de pavo → 24 g
5. Pechuga de pollo → 24 g
4. Queso parmesano → 35 g
3. Cacahuates (maní) → 26 g
2. Atún en conserva → 29 g
Y el #1 casi nadie lo consume con frecuencia...
👇
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.