@36872947go@glenn_tunes Tactically inept and professionally incompetent.
If you think there were no other options then you're wrong.
Whilst fixated with the officers in front, she presented the largest muscle mass (her back) unguarded for an absolute age and not one of the officers armed with CED acted.
@RScottGorman@SwingLeftBR Given their number they were tactically inept.
And there's nothing anti American about that.
Was the shooting justified - no doubt.
Was it the only option - only because they made it that way and failed to take advantage of the many opportunities this fixated individual presented
@dav1stated@ChukaMVP@jacob_mauren@Mr_Quincy05@ASFleischman group would definitely have been affective. Not to say it would have been successful but there seemed little attempt by other situationally aware officers to take advantage of her obvious fixation with the officers straight ahead of her.
Was the shot justified, yes, of course.
@dav1stated@ChukaMVP@jacob_mauren@Mr_Quincy05@ASFleischman I can't obvs comment on US firearms training but there seemed little effort for any officer to create 90° with the subject which would have offered the opportunity for CED (Taser) to the massive muscle group on the subjects back. Neuro-muscular incapacitation of that muscle 1/2
@AndrewMass82985@Quadcarl CED or Tasers work by neuro-muscular incapacitation. Someone "on something" can't power through or overcome the effects.
That said, there are numerous external and environmental factors which affect the successful deployment of a CED.
No real issues in deployment here though.
@Joseph889479793@JoJoFromJerz Yeah mate.
He alienates allies, starts unwinable/strategically inept wars, doesn't understand how tariffs work, mocks disabled reporters, speaks ill of the dead and grabs women by the pussy but he'd be terrified of being accused of attacking free speech.
@KeeranIsBuzzing@WalesOnline Yes. As you've cut n paste on nearly every post today.
And your view is no less narrow minded and bereft of hope on this reading than it was on the first.
He's only pleading for the same investment as other countries.
And it isn't personal when he's appealing on behalf of others.
@David__deee@NeverteIImeodd You believe the one line description posted by a click for view X account on an incident they have absolutely no knowledge of?
Jeeeez. People are so thick.
@jojoandalfster@TheBritLad And the answers are there.
Just not for your consumption as things stand.
It's a need to know situation.
And you clearly don't need to know.
@Ian418649847465@TheBritLad I'll wager a decent bit of money that a conviction ensues.
You know. One achieved by solid, conscientious police work and not pure guesswork formed from absolutely f@ck all.
We'll see how much your "schoolboy error" judgement and armchair assessment means come that day.
@CBarrett47@urpalg@amandaknox That's a strange term to use:
"Fraudulent" trial and your assertion that circumstantial evidence cannot, in itself, be sufficiency of proof is enough to convince me that you have very little knowledge of the subject.
@Gingelltown99@Sausageandeggx Everyone in Scotland knew about this. And many more who paid attention did too.
Your ignorance of a well publicised and notorious case is not permission to spew your hateful bile.
No one was kept in the dark.
Those who were in the dark already willfully chose to remain there.
@KaneHosler@officialdafc Thank you Kane and for your dignified message.
The very best of luck on what comes next and that peach against Dundee United will live long in the memory 👌
COYP 🏁
@Ryan04929290@Josh_Gurvitz04@MrDude079 It's called getting a hard on because you think you can at last legitimately shoot someone in public.
https://t.co/5k5InmmscM