van keller

[van keller @rellekcnav]

**🚨 Chuck, the gaslighting is next-level here.**

Trump isn’t “sending” $300B of American taxpayer cash to Iran. It’s a **private reconstruction fund** from Gulf states and international investors — ZERO US government money, conditional on Iran ditching nukes, proxies, and chaos. Strait of Hormuz reopening = lower gas prices for us.

You’d know that if you read past the headline. Or is this just another “Orange Man Bad” script to block peace?

Democrats blocked deals before… now crying about one that doesn’t cost us a dime?

What do YOU think, America? Lie or cope? 👇🔥 #IranDeal #AmericaFirst

[van keller @rellekcnav]

**Hey @ewarren,**

Gas +40%? Airfares +27%?

Funny how those numbers exploded right after the Strait of Hormuz got shut down in the Iran mess.

Where were these dramatic charts when inflation hit **9%+** under Biden-Harris? Back then it was all “corporate greed” and praise for the Inflation Reduction Act, right? Zero posts blaming “Biden’s disastrous policies.”

Now it’s all Trump’s fault the second energy spikes?

Classic.

Prices are already sliding with the new deal reopening the strait — but keep farming those outrage clicks, Senator. Americans see the flip-flop.

What changed? Or is it only “disastrous” when the other team’s in charge?

Drop your old Biden-era charts below 👇

(Everyone reply with your gas receipt from 2022 vs now)

[van keller @rellekcnav]

😂 Schumer’s at it again — twisting a non-binding MOU into “Trump’s giving Iran $300 BILLION of YOUR money”

Reality check: The doc says the US will help facilitate a plan **with regional partners** (Saudi, UAE, etc.) for Iran’s reconstruction. No taxpayer dollars. No blank check. Just licenses & waivers so Gulf states can invest if Iran behaves.

Classic Dem scare tactic.

Trump denied a direct US payout because… there isn’t one.

Who’s buying this spin in 2026? Drop your thoughts 👇

#IranDeal #SchumerLies #Trump2024

[van keller @rellekcnav]

**🚨 Harry, this is peak TDS spin. Let’s fact-check your “fleeced” narrative real quick 👇**

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED (per the MOU framework):

- **Ceasefire + Strait of Hormuz reopened** → Oil flows again, global markets stabilize, gas prices trending DOWN. Win for drivers & economy.<grok:render card_id=“b07611” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">7</argument></grok:render>
- Temporary sanctions waivers & frozen asset access (NOT instant $300B giveaway — conditional, performance-based during 60-day talks). Iran gets revenue only if they behave.<grok:render card_id=“6e47fe” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">8</argument></grok:render>
- Nuclear talks ramp up: Down-blend enriched uranium, IAEA monitoring, no weapons path. Missile program untouched for now, but proxies & nukes were the red line.<grok:render card_id=“bae3d4” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">10</argument></grok:render>
- US objectives? War de-escalated, no endless occupation, blockade lifted on our terms, lives saved on all sides.

**We got:** Peace through strength after hitting their capabilities hard. Higher gas? Blame the war disruption, not the deal ending it.

Harry, you mad Trump got a framework done in months that others couldn’t? Or just farming those blue check rage clicks? 😏

What do YOU think — good deal or “appeasement”? Drop your hottest take below. Let’s debate. 🔥🇺🇸

#IranDeal #Trump2028 #Ceasefire

[van keller @rellekcnav]

🚨 **Math Check: Does Warren’s “Tax Elon, Fund Childcare” Actually Add Up?** 🚨

Elizabeth Warren claims her wealth tax on **Elon Musk alone** would magically pay for universal childcare for every 3- and 4-year-old in America.

Sounds nice… until you run the numbers.

Musk’s wealth tax under her plan? Roughly **$20-25 BILLION** a year.

Actual cost of universal pre-K for 3-4 year olds? Closer to **$35 BILLION+** annually (and full childcare proposals are WAY higher).

So… it doesn’t even cover that one program. Add in the usual wealth tax problems (valuation games, rich people leaving, economic drag) and it’s pure political theater.

Would you trust politicians with “free” stuff funded by raiding billionaires? Or does this just prove government spending math never works?

Drop your take 👇 Like if the numbers don’t lie. RT if Warren needs a calculator. 🔥

#WealthTax #ElizabethWarren #ElonMusk

[van keller @rellekcnav]

**No, Senator. This is misleading.**

Trump isn’t “sending” $300 billion of U.S. taxpayer money to Iran. Reports describe a potential **private investment/reconstruction vehicle** (up to $300B) funded primarily by **Gulf nations** and companies — not American taxpayers — tied to Iran complying with a peace/nuclear framework.<grok:render card_id=“febc86” card_type=“citation_card” type=“render_inline_citation”><argument name="citation_id">0</argument></grok:render>

### Quick reality check on the priorities:

- **Homelessness**: California alone spent ~$24B+ and saw numbers rise. Billions more federally haven’t “ended” it — because it’s not just a funding problem (housing supply, addiction, mental health matter too).
- **Cancer research**: NCI’s annual budget is ~$7B. $300B would be massive long-term support, but we’ve already spent hundreds of billions over decades without “curing” it. Progress comes from science, not blank checks.
- **Pre-K**: Universal pre-K estimates run $20-35B+ **per year**. Feasible for several years on paper, but implementation, quality, and results vary wildly in practice.

Money alone doesn’t magically solve complex issues (see endless spending on these fronts with mixed results).

This framing turns a conditional, non-U.S.-funded investment carrot for regional stability into “Trump sending your money to Iran.” Classic scare tactic.

America First includes smart diplomacy that avoids endless wars and lets allies/Gulf states foot more of the bill when possible — not isolation or blank checks to adversaries.

Facts over fear, Senator. 🇺🇸

[van keller @rellekcnav]

🚨 **THREAD ALERT** 🚨

Rick Wilson and the Lincoln Project crew are at it AGAIN—repeating the same debunked lie on loop like a broken record:

“Trump is giving $300 billion to Iran”

…said 7 times for emphasis. Because saying it more makes it true, right? 😂

This is peak TDS desperation. No U.S. taxpayer dollars. No “giving.” It’s about unfreezing Iranian assets or Gulf investments post-ceasefire talks. But facts don’t matter when you’re farming rage clicks.

How many times have these clowns lied about Trump and foreign policy? Iran deal flashbacks, anyone?

Drop your biggest Rick Wilson/Lincoln Project flop below 👇

Quote-tweet if you’re tired of the gaslighting.

Like if Trump Derangement Syndrome needs its own DSM entry.

RT to expose the echo chamber! 🔥🇺🇸

(What’s your take—real deal or total fiction?)

[van keller @rellekcnav]

🚨 HOT TAKE 🚨
Illinois Speaker Chris Welch is out here crying “soul-hurting” and demanding Trump apologize to Kristen Welker… because she got pressed in an interview? 😭
This isn’t “disrespect to Black women and journalists.” It’s called journalism. Tough questions happen. Interrupting and pushing got pushback.
Welch turning a standard media clash into a race/gender crisis is peak grift.
What’s more insulting — a President holding the press accountable, or politicians playing the victim card every single time?
Drop your thoughts 👇 Who’s really hurting democracy here?
#Trump #MediaBias #Welker #IllinoisPolitics

[van keller @rellekcnav]

😂 Brian out here celebrating a “flop” on Day 1 ballot drops like it’s game over.
LA’s mail-in ballot machine still grinding away and the gap between Pratt and Raman is already tightening fast. Bass is cruising to the runoff, but the real drama is who joins her.
Is this just “how California counts votes” (late mail-ins favoring one side) or something sketchier?
Drop your take below — rigged process or totally normal? 👀🇺🇸
What do you think happens by the final count? Quote-tweet with your prediction!
(And Spencer Pratt power-washing the streets of LA sounded kinda based ngl) 🔥

[van keller @rellekcnav]

This is textbook misleading framing. Here’s why:
The jury in the E. Jean Carroll case explicitly rejected the rape claim. They found Trump liable for sexual abuse (forcible digital penetration), not rape under New York’s narrow legal definition at the time, which required penile penetration. That’s not semantics — that’s the verdict form. https://t.co/IX9UlQPLFs
Judge Kaplan (who made no secret of his views) added post-trial commentary saying it was “rape” in the common everyday meaning. But the jury — the actual finders of fact — didn’t buy the full rape allegation. Media and activists then run with “adjudicated rapist” headlines to sound scarier, ignoring the distinction. https://t.co/VeybItDq81
This is classic lawfare + narrative spin:
• Civil case (preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt)
• Decades-old allegation with no physical evidence or contemporaneous report
• Judge clarifying after the fact doesn’t rewrite the jury’s box they checked “No” on rape
Why do they keep pushing the stronger word when the jury said otherwise? Because “sexual abuser” doesn’t trigger the same outrage mob.
Facts over feelings. The verdict is public — read it yourself instead of the WaPo headline. What do you think — honest reporting or election interference remix? 👀🔥
(Engage below if you’ve seen this playbook before!)

[van keller @rellekcnav]

This is textbook misleading framing. Here’s why:
The jury in the E. Jean Carroll case explicitly rejected the rape claim. They found Trump liable for sexual abuse (forcible digital penetration), not rape under New York’s narrow legal definition at the time, which required penile penetration. That’s not semantics — that’s the verdict form. https://t.co/IX9UlQPLFs
Judge Kaplan (who made no secret of his views) added post-trial commentary saying it was “rape” in the common everyday meaning. But the jury — the actual finders of fact — didn’t buy the full rape allegation. Media and activists then run with “adjudicated rapist” headlines to sound scarier, ignoring the distinction. https://t.co/VeybItDq81
This is classic lawfare + narrative spin:
• Civil case (preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt)
• Decades-old allegation with no physical evidence or contemporaneous report
• Judge clarifying after the fact doesn’t rewrite the jury’s box they checked “No” on rape
Why do they keep pushing the stronger word when the jury said otherwise? Because “sexual abuser” doesn’t trigger the same outrage mob.
Facts over feelings. The verdict is public — read it yourself instead of the WaPo headline. What do you think — honest reporting or election interference remix? 👀🔥
(Engage below if you’ve seen this playbook before!)

[van keller @rellekcnav]

🚨 KABOOM!
Brian Krassenstein is melting down again because the DOJ is finally investigating whether E. Jean Carroll lied under oath about who funded her Trump lawsuits.
“Disgusting”?
What’s actually disgusting is a decades-old accusation conveniently timed for political hits, massive cash judgments from New York kangaroo courts, and mysterious funding sources that smell like lawfare 101.
This isn’t “retaliation.” This is accountability.
If Carroll perjured herself and outside donors (hello, Democrat dark money?) bankrolled the whole thing to bankrupt a political opponent, the American people deserve to know. Rule of law cuts BOTH ways — or did that only matter when it was targeting Trump?
The same crowd screaming “no one is above the law” now cries victim when scrutiny hits their sacred narrative.
Funny how that works.
What do YOU think — is this legitimate investigation or “revenge”? Drop your thoughts below. 👇
#Trump #Lawfare #EJeanCarroll #DeepStateExposed

[van keller @rellekcnav]

@SenWarren Then change the tax code.

[van keller @rellekcnav]

@bruntworkwear https://t.co/mbWFSiw3ar

[van keller @rellekcnav]

@hodgetwins Shit, I’ll peddle some Israel talking points for a slice of that pie..

[van keller @rellekcnav]

Muhammad, a false prophet and warlord, spread his message through conquest and bloodshed, as seen in Sahih al-Bukhari 4.52.220 and Ibn Hisham’s Sira. His Quran in Surah 4:171 denies Jesus as God’s Son and in Surah 4:157 rejects His crucifixion, aligning perfectly with the spirit of the Antichrist warned about in 1 John 2:22. Islam’s teachings are the words of the Antichrist, deceiving millions by distorting the true Jesus

[van keller @rellekcnav]

Muhammad, a false prophet and warlord, spread his message through conquest and bloodshed, as seen in Sahih al-Bukhari 4.52.220 and Ibn Hisham’s Sira. His Quran in Surah 4:171 denies Jesus as God’s Son and in Surah 4:157 rejects His crucifixion, aligning perfectly with the spirit of the Antichrist warned about in 1 John 2:22. Islam’s teachings are the words of the Antichrist, deceiving millions by distorting the true Jesus

[van keller @rellekcnav]

uhammad, a false prophet and warlord, spread his message through conquest and bloodshed, as seen in Sahih al-Bukhari 4.52.220 and Ibn Hisham’s Sira. His Quran in Surah 4:171 denies Jesus as God’s Son and in Surah 4:157 rejects His crucifixion, aligning perfectly with the spirit of the Antichrist warned about in 1 John 2:22. Islam’s teachings are the words of the Antichrist, deceiving millions by distorting the true Jesus

[van keller @rellekcnav]

@EdKrassen I bought my turkey and ham after Christmas last year for $5 and $10 when they went on sale.

[van keller @rellekcnav]

@PeterBurnsESPN That math is mathing!!💪🏼