y'all jumped on the obviously bogus psionics bandwagon even though seasoned vets with decades of psi experience showed distrust, when is the X community going to understand, it's one big psyop. Vet all claims, statements, videos, images, people, BEFORE, you publicise and share...
@ms131978_markus@digijordan The issue I have is that the project was flawed, most of the participants were told what the target or project was upfront, thats not blind remote viewing.
What did our remote viewers discover when tasked with one of history’s most mysterious relics?
⚡ THE SPEAR OF DESTINY ⚡
Our Down the Rabbit Hole team explored the events surrounding the Spear, its strange energetic qualities — and the question of where it might be today.
Four viewers. Blind data. One legendary target.
Watch the full project 👇
https://t.co/3ZhIisUdhy
#RemoteViewing #SpearOfDestiny #Mysteries #DTRH
Another example of using remote viewing in TRW to help make decisions, where the feedback (news) shows our RV was correct.
Five Years Ago We Said He Would Be Arrested...
https://t.co/JyHLsKKvc5
oh yes, we did remote view Skinwalker Ranch twice. I'm definitely not "UFO rv'er" guy. RV'ing UFO's is waaay low on my list of important RV use cases. But this is what happened in that session! It got my attention for sure. @TheOfficial_FFG
@fringedotcom Agree, it may be the mindful intent behind the shouting or action, not the name used. That would tally with psi research showing the intent is paramount.
Are we someone else’s experiment?
World-renowned remote viewer Daz Smith returns to the program for an in-depth exploration of the most consequential remote-viewing sessions of his career and what their findings could mean for humanity and our future.
This conversation challenges some of our most fundamental assumptions about reality and opens the door to possibilities that could change how we understand ourselves, our world and our place within it.
Here's my issue. 99.99% of courtneys proejcts are UAP/alien related. So, feed his AI with UAP targets, and what's it going to give you data on?
How about we try several non-UAP, random and standard or typical RV training-type targets and let's see the results here: like I did multiple times here: https://t.co/xRiEqF7hzk