@MovaOl@Sulkhan Turkmenistan: long time leader. Change when he died. Then hereditary presidency
Kyrgyzstan: long time leader, then some power struggles. At least they had a (semi) peaceful transition of power through elections.
Russia: well, we know that.
@MovaOl@Sulkhan Media may be biased, but the results published by the government are official and vetted by the regimes themselves:
Tajikistan: no change since 92
Uzbekistan: long time leader. Change when he died
Azerbaijan: hereditary presidency
@MovaOl@FranklyProRu@Sulkhan I mean, there are no reports of inherent evil about Tokayev transpiring where I am from. But elections in the post-Soviet space are mostly a joke. Only one country had a non-hereditary peaceful change of power, IIRC. It slips my mind which one and I am too lazy to do the research
@GaryPetersonUSA Funny, but this is the cardboard cutout Trump allowed the Balkan heads of state to take pictures with. Also, that is not Laura Loomer, but an antropomorphic lemming with a Saw mask on
@FranklyProRu@Sulkhan But the label of chaotic ultra-violent mob is sort of one-sided. As an example: if you define anything against the regime as nazi, it doesn't make it nazi in the proper sense of the word, just because some 80 years ago, in between invading other countries, you fought your old pal
@MichaelFreikorp I like the no data between east Asian and blacks :). Other than Korea War and the odd Chinese guy in Africa there are not a lot of samples. Maybe San Francisco in 20 years will change that, though the blacks will be generally priced out by then