@EricAdamsFanBoy I think supporting a different policy set speaks more to different views of the causal story rather than differences in actual care about an issue in cases like these
@shanewallick A trouble I have w/ this framework, via analogy: suppose Ted and Sue are married, and Ted goes into a coma. Doctors predict heโll come out of the coma in 9 months, good as new, though at Sueโs great monetary and emotional expense.
@shanewallick There are many born people dependent on others to survive, although perhaps not to the same intimate level. One might think of a young infant, a disabled person, or a Siamese twin.
@shanewallick A fetus seems rather like someone in a coma in this respect.
Additionally, does this not potentially create worrying moral hierarchies in personhood, if some brains function better than others? Do the lives of the mentally disabled count for less?
@shanewallick Is there not a relevant difference btwn a fetus with a brain that, if allowed to develop, would eventually function properly, and a braindead person whose brain will never function again? It seems to me potential counts for something.
@shanewallick So what differentiates the fetal life from any other human life in a moral sense, to you? Or do you take the JJT path to support for legal abortion?
House Rs who voted for the ๐บ๐ฆ Support Act:
Don Bacon
Robert Bresnahan
Mike Carey
Brian Fitzpatrick
Andrew Garbarino
Carlos Gimenez
Jeff Hurd
David Joyce
Jen Kiggans
Nick LaLota
Mike Lawler
Michael McCaul
Max Miller
Greg Murphy
Dan Newhouse
Glenn Thompson
Mike Turner
Joe Wilson
@shanewallick Do you accept human lives generally as valuable and worth protecting? Why and on what grounds? My own may differ from yours on some level but I assume we at least have common ground there.
@shanewallick I think the current obvious position of metaphysical ambiguity defaults to the potential moral stakes. Given we consider born human lives so valuable and worth protecting, the moral stakes are higher here if they are persons than if not. Ergo, you have the burden of proof here.