Tato

[Tato @retartato]

@CFTradercom 1x 50k 1 phase, 1x 10k instant.
Put the remaining in shitters

[Tato @retartato]

@CFTradercom Me?

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo One might say that's a lot of rules, but rules are very important in this game.

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo I see, i look at all that too. But it's not what confirms the div.
Reclaiming the left low (before the confirming candle) is a very good sign indeed (like a po3). Reclaiming the middle high is even better (msb).
But a div confirmation and a div invalidation comes differently.

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo I'll leave it be. Just want to know, at what point do you say "the divergence is confirmed "

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo I did mention 2 more points why there is something to argue about. Also I lost some respect for your opinion when you said wick to wick is fine.

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo "Closes changes based on TF" well so does RSI. Daily rsi must always be measured against daily closes (line chart)

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo 3. What's different here from 2022? This time rai when above 50. Which marks a new cycle for rsi.

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo 1. RSI uses closed price for calculation so divs should never be drawn from wicks

Still a div?

2. The lows should be CONSECUTIVE. A lot of people forget this one.

You need to wait for these to be consecutive lows on a setting of n-fractal or n-pivot structure. Now a div?

[Tato @retartato]

@btcbalo Not correctly, the div is wrong

[Tato @retartato]

The Tuition Fee of Trading https://t.co/uvoAvXvWJK

[Tato @retartato]

Published my first article

RSI and its divergences https://t.co/n5YXESCTaX