𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞𝗦
Patterns, tactics, mechanisms.
𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘖𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘣𝘦𝘳 2025

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@Npc28339 @WallStreetMav Strange data deserves an explanation.
What it doesn’t automatically deserve is a conclusion.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

Fair point. Thanks.
I should probably have phrased my point more like this:

”You’re right that the batch deserves an explanation.
What I’m questioning is the leap from “unexplained batch” to “evidence of fraud.”
Reporting errors, incomplete imports, or administrative issues are all possible explanations until we see the actual data.”

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@The1stFaceless @TheRabbitHole There is no third gamete. Biological variation is not the same claim as a third sex. Variations between the two reproductive sexes exist, and that’s been well documented for decades.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@GenoHartley @Saxdonut @WallStreetMav Fair enough. What specifically do you think is missing?

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@TrumpWarRoom Is this really what “Make America Great Again” looks like?

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@TheLeftIsNutz @RealEradikate @Badussi123 @elonmusk For someone who seems to value personal freedom, you spend a surprising amount of time worrying about how other adults choose to live their lives.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

You’re right that the anomaly deserves an explanation.
My point is that “unexplained” and “fraudulent” are not the same thing. Reporting errors, incomplete imports, or other administrative issues are possible explanations.
Pratt ultimately received 163,549 votes. That’s why the full dataset matters more than a single unexplained anomaly.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@TheLeftIsNutz @RealEradikate @Badussi123 @elonmusk You went from “1995” to trans people surprisingly fast. But sure. Trans people existed in 1995 too.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@jeffersonianguy @JustafanM @TheRabbitHole Human nature hasn’t changed much.
Our standards have. That’s why we no longer settle disputes with duels, burn witches, or hang people on crosses.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗢𝗟𝗕𝗢𝗫
𝗙𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗺𝗮 (1.2)
Either: XX/XY biology
Or: Madness

The actual discussion is about how society should deal with the biological exceptions that do exist.

“XX/XY exists” and “biological variation exists” are not contradictions. Both are true.

[The Rabbit Hole @TheRabbitHole]

“It will be the official policy of the United States to recognize only two genders: male and female.”

— Donald Trump

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

Nobody is far right simply because they’re “from 1995.”
The original meme is trying to turn “far right” into a synonym for “the norm.” That simply isn’t true. Just as “far left” isn’t the norm either.
Most people recognize that societies evolve. What is considered “normal” evolves too.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@Fdruid @TheRabbitHole Quite a few people seem proud of not having updated their idea of what’s “normal” in 30 years.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@parrotyaccount3 @TheRabbitHole The reactions are actually proving the point. Quite a few people seem proud of not having updated their idea of what’s “normal” in 30 years.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@JustafanM @TheRabbitHole I think some people are reading this backwards. It’s questioning whether “normal” should be defined by a worldview from 30 years ago.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@JEE_LONmusk @TheRabbitHole That’s useful. Sometimes you learn more from a meme that doesn’t work than from one that does.

[𝗥𝗲:𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗹 @retellthis]

@stargateops @WhiteHouse Nah. Engagement bait is content where the primary purpose is to generate engagement rather than convey information.