Rev

Architect collecting art

[Rev @rev_ilo]

epoch 82

still alive

fuck you, higher🤘

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@rbnsnstgrg Gm 🚗

[Rev @rev_ilo]

“whales cannot ruin gameplay for others”

[NFTLaurent @LaurentNft64534]

.@m0dest___ Any chance we can overthrow the IRS? There's definitely a coalition of (exhausted and broke) willing 😅

[Rev @rev_ilo]

Tried to ask what holders think of exactly what you just said the other day… there is a way where every player still in the game ends up in profit (before loosing it all). The 59 that would let their citizen die will receive a bit more then 4 eth - the 69 winners would receive around 3 eth plus the animated one. We send them all to modest(since we can’t change the contract), with the list of survivors, he let the others die and sends the eth and the animated ones after the game ends.

[Rev @rev_ilo]

No, but there is a solution for it if the remaining citizens work together. 480 eth in the pot means every citizen would get around 3.75 eth atm (which is just slightly more then invested so far, not counting the eth drop). We could agree on that every holder, that is willing to let his citizen die, get a little bit more, maybe 4 eth? How to do it: send all the remaining citizens to modests account with the list of the survivors, he then distributes the pot and the animated ones after the game is over. What are your thoughts on this? Im just thinking out loud here, don’t get me wrong please

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@cemhah Need one! 🔥

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@neonglitch86 @arthr @Scamart

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@AdamWeitsman @ToneAce561 Love to hear that ❤️

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@m0dest___ How we feeling today mod? :)

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@AndrewRiBT @suparno67 @skominers ❤️😅

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@raykimwon @suparno67 ❤️

[rkw @raykimwon]

The way I pay tribute to artists is simple.
I let them stay with me.

Some artists leave a footprint that remains long after you have seen the work. Their ideas settle somewhere in your mind and quietly influence how you see the world, right?

The Water Lily Pond by Claude Monet still exists in my head. So do the stacks of Donald Judd. So does Pepe by Matt Furie

They were created decades apart. None of them were made for the same audience actually but they continue to occupy the same mental space

I think digital art creates an interesting possibility. It allows ideas from different periods to Co-Exist in the same space

Works separated by decades or even centuries can now influence one another, creating relationships that could never have existed within a single lifetime

A Monet painting, a Judd sculpture, and a Furie character can meet with Rothko inside a single collection, or even a single thought of people

That interests me more than nostalgia

I am interested in what happens when ideas survive long enough to find each other, I wish I could live long enough to see all the new potentials of art too.

Love.

from Rothktown
and I.

[Mariah 💎 @0xVestica]

Just when you think you've lost it all

remember it can always get worse

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@bykellymcd 🔥❤️

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@Richi0118 @AdamWeitsman @Dannyb0yyy_ @NFCsummit Three legends having great time - love to see it 🥂

[Jett @fun_tokens]

At nearly 500eth in the treasury some good splits can be made between 129. Just need a value for the animated citizens that would result in the necessary 69 / 59 split.
For example all 128 could get the 3eth (ish) spent on taxes so far and then 69 could receive “profit” in art (animated citizens) and 59 could receive profit in an extra 1.6eth (ish). So you could have 3 eth plus animated citizen or just 4.6eth and an evader. Ignoring $ values.

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@fun_tokens @suparno67 @dept_of_death @m0dest___ Thats exactly what i was trying to propose… would be a huge win for the game and the whole art space as well (thinking about all the eth flowing back into art) would really love to hear what other holders think about it

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@m0dest___ ❤️

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@5tr4n0 Yesyesyes

[Rev @rev_ilo]

@suparno67 @dept_of_death @m0dest___ Any thoughts on this @m0dest___ ? Is this really such a terrible idea? Of course we would need to agree on which 59 will die, but would love to hear your thoughts on it first.

[Rev @rev_ilo]

59 more need to die right? So we just need to agree on which 59, who is willing to let his citizen die - but for more eth then the 69 that would keep the animated ones. We wouldn’t change anything on the contract since we would need to send the living citizens to modest, who then quits paying the taxes for the 59 we agreed on. After they die, the game is over and modest distributes (sends) the eth and the animated citizens to the wallets. Im sure modest would do that for us - also imagine how much of that pot would immediately flow back into (modest) art.