Rexus Politicus

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

May be @CPDelhi have have no idea what’s is going on, @Meta officials should be scrutinised properly.

❗️❗️India is on serious internet attack threat❗️❗️

Obscene illegal prohibited sexual content 
like leaked private cams of innocent people
Hospital procedure and checkup videos of female patients
Epstein, CSAM (child sexual abuse material) and other heinous content with possible size ranging from 2 TB to 500 TB
And various other things

are being sold on

@instagram (estimated 2.5 million पच्चीस लाख such accounts and increasing)
@telegram (similar number of accounts)
Telegram x
@Reddit
@Snapchat
@TangoMe (all other similar video room platforms)
@X (twitter)
@WhatsApp may be involved as its telegramization is on the way
Adult video call apps on @Google play store

Through links from cloud stores
@Diskwala_
@skymute1
@Terrabox
@MEGAprivacy
@ProtonDrive
@Unlockr
@theflezen
And similar platforms

Payments are being done through:

@amazon Gift Cards
@UPI_NPCI
Teenager app
@PayPal
zomato gift card
Account number
Steam game cards
Razor pay 

⚠️⚠️It's not a problem of dark net any more cause content is easily available. 

The Indian Gen Z mentality is on risk as age group 14-21 year at risk ⚠️⚠️

AND GOVERNMENT NEED TO ACT

SAFE HARBOURS MUST GO

DEMOCRACY CAN EXIST WITHOUT THIS SOCIAL MEDIA SH*T

TOO MUCH ANONYMITY HAS BECOME A PROBLEM(anonymous payments, anonymous IP addresses, anonymous e mails, anonymous Social media accounts)

Ensure mandatory address and phone number verification for @gmail account(as age can be faked by Gen Z) and semesterly selfie update on it

Third party application installing must be banned on all devices

❗️❗️India need unique id number for its citizen for any kind of online platform and transaction❗️❗️

For some time Influencers and privacy loving citizens of india can kiss their **s

Talk to @RBI and other banks to track payments at large

As individual complains and account reporting is not going to solve it you report 1 account cartel will create 10.

@Cyberdost @MHAIndia @MeityGov
Don’t wait for individual small complains.
What if elite kids are involved??

@Meta is a hub for these kind of activities if India want to start action. Act upon Instagram and Telegram first rest can wait investigation.
#internet

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

@neha_laldas मातंग तो ऋषि रहे हैं

[Saumya Hemant Mishra @SaumyaHemant]

When the Manusmriti existed, Savitri chose Satyavan against her parents wishes. When the Manusmriti existed, Sita chose Rama through a swayamvara. When the Manusmriti existed, Gargi contributed to the Vedic intellectual tradition while Apala and Ghosha composed hymns in the Rig Veda. When the Manusmriti existed, Bharati, the wife of Mandana Mishra, presided over the famous shastrartha between her husband and Adi Shankaracharya and had the intellectual authority to judge the debate. Shankaracharya himself engaged in debate with Bharati and acknowledged her scholarship.

When the Manusmriti existed, women could learn, debate, compose, govern and fight.

Ahilyabai Holkar became one of India’s most admired rulers. Jijabai raised Shivaji and played a profound role in shaping the man who established Hindavi Swarajya. Rani Lakshmibai learned the art of warfare and fought the British on the battlefield. Women were also known as Brahmavadinis, women devoted to the pursuit and teaching of knowledge.

Kings were not always the sole authority in matters of governance; queens and royal women often participated in affairs of the state. When the Manusmriti existed, women such as Mirabai could choose their spiritual path and figures like Ravidas were revered across social and political hierarchies.

And when the Constitution of India was being framed, 15 women entered the Constituent Assembly without any provision of reservation including women from diverse and historically disadvantaged backgrounds.

India’s history is far more complex than the convenient claim that women had no agency, voice, intellect or power before modern constitutional reforms. Read history in its entirety before rewriting it.

#Manusmriti #IndianHistory #Women

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

@jogandharayana Not for everyday temple visit but for rituals and festive pujas they wear only dhoti and angavastram.

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Hinduism is not Abrahamic.
No single category—male or female—is ultimately powerful.
In different contexts, men lead; in others, women lead.
Authority shifts with role and principle, not a fixed gender hierarchy.

So neither PATRIARCHAL nor MATRIARCHAL

Even when speaking of the ultimate Divine, for some it is Devi, for some it is Brahma, Vishnu, or Mahesha, and for some it is Ardhanarishvara.

#ManuSmriti

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga

[Rexus Politicus @RexusPoliticus]

Guru Gorakhnāth and the core Nāth tradition were not primarily related to Vedic studies. Nath sampraday emphasizes haṭha-yoga, kuṇḍalinī, the guru–śiṣya relationship, and direct experiential realization of the Absolute. (like present day
@SadhguruJV
)

Nowhere in the primary classical texts is the practice of yoga or the guru-śiṣya relationship prohibited on the basis of caste (varṇa or jāti).

Guru Gorakhnath’s foundation was not caste specific but it wasn’t specifically against Manusmriti as it is fantastic historical Niyam(law) Guide.

#Manusmriti is not exclusively rigid about birth based caste: A key verse (10.65) states that a Shudra can attain the position of a Brahmana, and a Brahmana can sink to the level of a Shudra (and similarly for the other varnas) based on their karma.

Related verses (around 10.64) describe improvement or decline over successive generations (up to the seventh) through better or worse offspring and unions. This links status change to lineage quality over time rather than an individual’s single lifetime occupation alone.

All four varnas share basic ethical duties such as non-violence (ahimsa), truthfulness, non-stealing, purity, and sense control (10.63). In times of adversity (apad-dharma, discussed in Chapter 10), people may temporarily take up occupations outside their normal varna duties.

And if Manusmriti was so against non Brahmins then how come we have
Rishi Satyakama Jabala
Rishi Veda Vyasa
Rishi Vishwamitra
Rishi Valmeeki
Rishi Matanga