Richard(Dick) Temple

Student of Longevity, Entrepreneur, Philanthropist, Traveller, Explorer, growing younger every day!

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@Rusia_HD Yes

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

https://t.co/2HOquqNfqe

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@ClaudetteSurrey @YouTube When will we ever learn? So sad...

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@JDVanceNewsX Yes

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@wolsned No

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@JacquiDeevoy1 You give them a hug and tell them that they are entitled to believe whatever they want.

[George Galloway @georgegalloway]

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE - MOATS with George Galloway Ep 351 https://t.co/ELImUBXgum

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

The lawyer who drafted the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act 1989 in the US affirms that the Covid 19 ‘vaccines’ are biological weapons under the terms of the legislation he drafted.
Dr Francis Boyle was giving evidence in an application for a petition to get the governor of Florida to ban MRNA injections.

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@morellifit @robsinbos Firstly,I may be wrong, but I believe that it is illegal in UK or USA to claim a cure for cancer. Secondly you did not cure her. It would be safer to say that you provided all the information and advice needed to enable her amazing body to cure itself.

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@carolvorders @ceejay_epping @JolyonMaugham Does this mean they can claim legal asylum in the EU?

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@siantinkerbell @carolvorders Where's Johnson on that list?

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@JonMayhew6 @carolvorders @RBReich Any if he invested £1b at 5% pa he would receive 50m pa which is £136k per day! I know what I'd do!

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@David__Osland I remember this well. The reason given was that private companies would be able to invest the huge amounts needed to improve the infrastructure. Instead of this the shares were sold cheap...directors were paid huge salaries and profits were pissed away to pay shareholders.

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@LangmanVince @elonmusk Which one?

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

@elonmusk Maybe if America stopped causing mayhem around the world then less people would want to escape their ruined countries.

[Claudette @ClaudetteSurrey]

@DrSuneelDhand Use cash whenever possible, and be your own central banker.

[Richard(Dick) Temple @Richtemple]

Some tuth for a change:
https://t.co/aMYlrv3d9V

[Freed Assange - #FreeAssange @FreeAssangeNews]

Day X is here: the last chance in the British courts to stop Julian Assange’s extradition

Protest to defend a free press.

20 February and 21 February

Time: 8.30am
Place: Royal Courts of Justice, London WC2A 2LL

Click here to register your attendance:
https://t.co/8N6bsrPAbC

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

And some people still think this is just a ‘coincidence’.

Correlation is not causation, but it is an alarm signal. Alarm bells are going off all over the building,but no one wants to check if there is a fire.

[aussie17 @_aussie17]

Below is a message from Dr Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of the Allergy and Respiratory Research Division of Pfizer, and is the co-founder and former CEO of the biotechnology company Ziarco

Dear all, I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says).

More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.

Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it. Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well. 

Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed. 

Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many. 

One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are. 

In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues. 

So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity. I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera and affidavits.

No one has tapped me on the shoulder to explain why I’ve got it all wrong. Several very clever people have independently said overlapping things, such as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi. 

Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals). 

That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization. We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms. Within weeks of commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later.  If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.

link to open letter to EMA:
https://t.co/jaWcSYLs6Y
--------------------------------