What the horseshow theory gets right is that both far left nor far right are authoritarian; they know the truth. If you disagree, you will be put in prison. You don't have to actually disagree; it is enough for someone closer to the centre of power to simply make that claim
What the horseshow theory gets right is that both far left nor far right are authoritarian; they know the truth. If you disagree, you will be put in prison. You don't have to actually disagree; it is enough for someone closer to the centre of power to simply make that claim
What the horseshow theory gets right is that both far left nor far right are authoritarian; they know the truth. If you disagree, you will be put in prison. You don't have to actually disagree; it is enough for someone closer to the centre of power to simply make that claim
@danielgoyal If the population as a whole fails to understand that voting for self-serving representatives leads to loss of reputation abroad and poverty at home, then tinkering with the constitution can make no difference.
We need to change our democracy model so politicians have less power
@DrSteveTaylor These are the costs per procedure.
A much better illustration would be to take a look at the terms and costs of National Insurance compared to private insurance (e.g. in a country without universal healthcare such as the US)
@Suewilson91 The 'con' could only work on those who believe that tinkering with fiscal rules can make you rich. We know who they are...
Whereas, cutting yourself off from your nearest neighbours, both in trade terms and socially, could only make us all poorer. And so that's where we are...
@carolvorders Maybe it's time to notice that the system of ideologies and parties is not serving us well.
First, get rid of this particular corrupt shower.
Next support PR.
Then, look for a system where people's representatives can deliberate to achieve the best outcome for everyone
@electoralreform Democracy means elections.
Elections mean parties.
Parties mean ideology.
Ideology means not doing the right thing in the circumstances.
A second house, free of appointments, parties and elections, would be free to deliberate on each issue properly
@harari_yuval As many have said, truth is tricky!
What every person _is_ an expert on is whether a candidate is a decent human being or not.
Some will always be tempted to vote for ideology or personal advantage...
If you want to live in a decent country, vote for decent representatives!
@electoralreform@grahambsi Elections mean perpetuating the same old party system, driven by ideology rather than common sense that has served us so well - not - for centuries.
Some method of random selection of volunteers would restore the balance we need
Once the country has a universal ID card system, then it can be used for all kinds of public transactions, including voting. It works great all over Europe.
Requiring an ID card just for voting highlights the Tory's intentions: to stop people voting against them!
Once the country has a universal ID card system, then it can be used for all kinds of public transactions, including voting. It works great all over Europe.
Requiring an ID card just for voting highlights the Tory's intentions: to stop people voting against them!
Once the country has a universal ID card system, then it can be used for all kinds of public transactions, including voting. It works great all over Europe.
Requiring an ID card just for voting highlights the Tory's intentions: to stop people voting against them!
@PhilipSteart@supertanskiii Decisions need to be taken by a randomly selected group of volunteers from the community.
Those decisions can be implemented by politicians.
Representative democracy has failed due to bad actors and needs to be reformed
@SimonCalder@mikegalsworthy Millions will now be worse off in Brexit Britain.
This is not because the people voted for Brexit.
It's because the Government botched the implementation of the people's will by violating the democratic processes that were generally accepted as the way things shoudl be done
@bbcpress Perhaps this is a good time to consider a concept called "Democracy at Work". If the BBC were so organised, it would truly be a public broadcaster, there would be no issues with impartiality and no problems with government ministers being tempted to dictate how it should report
@OxfordDiplomat "Every accusation a confession"
It is the government that is at odds with British values.
The government are blinded by their ideology from taking perfectly humanitarian and humanistic steps towards resolving the crisis they themselves provoked and contributed to
@OxfordDiplomat For Europe, why not start negotiating with the regimes of underpopulated countries for space to develop dual-sovereignty cities (like Hong Kong was) where refugees could start new lives, safe from the political pressures that made them refugees in the first place
@OxfordDiplomat The ONLY legitimate and feasible ways of addressing this problem is to ensure that FIRST the UK has a proper working system of assessing refugee claims available where the refugees currently are and 2ND to cooperate with the rest of Europe. Humanity first!