@SaintHeartwing@gd_reaper1@LeverNews@grahamformaine@davidsirota The Supreme Court has already ruled presidents have complete immunity. Which has been the de facto rule for decades. Who is going to stop them? A strongly worded letter? lol. The “rules based order” is being destroyed in front of our eyes and you’re screaming into the void.
@SaintHeartwing@gd_reaper1@LeverNews@grahamformaine@davidsirota You said the president couldn’t nationalize a bank. Ronald Reagan did. Without congress. What he did after that is irrelevant. He could’ve kept it and ran it for the people. Obama could have done that too and much, much more.
@SaintHeartwing@gd_reaper1@LeverNews@grahamformaine@davidsirota Nationalize the banks or start a national bank and require accounts for every tax payer in the country with tax returns and other social services paid through them. There were 100 different things Obama could have done. He chose to ignore 99 of them.
@moetkacik When she made a video talking about class, completely glossing over Marxism and focusing on class as income levels because Marx was “boring.” That was the exact moment I knew she was talking out of her ass.
@extweetenator@daltonhighway15@auautumntumn@ContraPoints@DAguerrebere “Unforced errors” as in the Clinton campaign pushing Trump to the top of the dogpile because they believed it would give them a better shot at winning? They, and Hillary by extension, are the reason we’re in this mess.
@sororaborealis@GandalfTheBlac7@ContraPoints They tend to change history in a bad way. See: Ferdinand and WW1. Even the “good” ones tend to only have temporary benefits. Or they fail and make things worse. See: Ronald Reagan.
@JenniferLoewe10@anarcho_baker Thank you. Chomsky is not above criticism but the lack of critical thinking and willingness to turn against him with zero evidence of wrongdoing has been astounding.