AI agents can write code many times faster than a human. What this means is that you, the programmer, have a large amount of time to use those agents to write unit tests, to write acceptance, tests, to write property tests, to torture test, to mutate test, to QA test, and to otherwise ensure that the code meets its functional and quality requirements. And even after spending all that time, you will still be many times more productive than a human programmer, and the result will be better.
I’m significantly older than you. I started coding in the late 60s. My current strategy is to not read any of the code written by my agents. That’s the only way I can take advantage of their productivity. What I do instead is to surround the agents with extreme constraints. Unit tests, gherkin tests, QA procedures, quality metrics, mutation testing, test coverage, and a plethora of others. In the end, I have very high confidence in the code they produce because they’ve had to run the gauntlet of all of my constraints and tests.
From @TheAthleticFC: Argentina disgraced themselves and the World Cup final with their charmless petulance, our columnist writes. It was "a tetchy, petulant and distasteful performance by the now deposed world champions." https://t.co/3X3DTE9PFe
💬 Dani Olmo habla sobre la imagen de Argentina dando la espalda a los jugadores de España cuando recogieron las medallas
🙌 "Somos un ejemplo para muchas generaciones, creo que ellos deben también serlo"
😅 Y aparece Rodri con la Copa
📽️ @martinezferran
@Hanzinho En realidad, se trata de tener una visión y un norte muy claros y, por supuesto, mantenerse fiel a una filosofía de juego. Todo lo demás se trabaja en función de esa visión.