Crediting the person who found or restored something is fair. Falsely presenting Rainbow-owned artwork as "Property of BeyondWinx" is not.
And then the audacity to make a "quick clarification" like you didn't know what you were writing lmfao
3/3
The audacity of @magixiaclub
Imagine taking artwork and concept material owned by Rainbow, stamping "Property of BeyondWinx" across it, then telling people it's prohibited (by what law?) to remove your watermark because it's supposedly your property because you "edited it".
1/3
Finding, compiling, restoring or arranging illegitimately obtained material does not transfer ownership, yet he demands that others retain his watermark, accuses people of "stealing his property", AND gatekeeps archival content that was never his to begin with.
2/3