There’s a reason why I keep this group low-key, super filtered at only 31 members even after months of restarting it and rejecting almost every join request unless vouched for or verifying your recent trading stats.
Don’t want a group where the CA spams are so incessant without any context/info that it just doesn’t make any difference if you trade in public groups or any other random group for that matter. Trade with info always.
Quality > Quantity always 🙏
Again starting my old Degen group. Market is trash but still some runners here and there. Get in if you’re still actively trenching in stocks commodities forex crypto perps and are a good hunter.
https://t.co/MpdzRm8nXj
Hey man. Appreciate what you’ve done for the defi community and everything that you stand for.
As a gesture, the @bankrbot community on @base came together and launched a bankr token for you where all the trading fees are redirected to you.
You can take a look and claim the fees. The base community would be more than happy to support you in your journey.
https://t.co/KYC4D2rsrL
Here’s my whole take on this @bankrbot token drama for @tinyhumansai
First of all, Steven has every right to accept or reject endorsing a token he never asked any of us to deploy for the project in the first place. Yes, he could have communicated much earlier and much better about having no intentions of integrating a token to the project and stopped multiple people from getting rekt but that is the price we as a trading community in defi pay for speculation. It did piss me off as well making me do all sorts of name calling but when i sat down and thought about this with a calm head, here are my honest thoughts.
None of these would happen if there weren’t bad actors in this space who Steven rightfully pointed out that bundled the supply and would dump on your heads in case of a full endorsement, not to mention the legal implications he would have to face tying the token directly to the project. Yes, I’m aware supply control is good for any token to run, but supply control in the hands of good team and with bad actors are two different things. And in this case, it wasn’t aware who was the cto team or even pushing this. We saw it a few days ago what happened with $TSG
There’s a lesson in there for all of us as a community coz what I’m about to say will hurt most of us but it’s the truth. Crypto as a community is Toxic and Wild af and if things don’t go their way, they tend to get even more toxic and aggressive in their approach and this is exactly what happened with this please bro. You all need to learn to be more professional and sophisticated in your approach in trying to onboard someone who didn’t come to you to launch a token for them, rather you did it yourselves. Give them time to breath and think about it rather than incessantly spam and annoy them.
Maybe @0xDeployer@igoryuzo@Dannyhbrown could find a way around it to make sure there’s no harassment of the devs who are actually shipping while they’re onboarded to bankr ecosystem, coz what bankr is giving is something only an open source Launchpad like it can give. Free fund-raising for actual devs who build and ship but don’t have access to VCs/Funds but need the funds to keep shipping.
My final take? I’m not against please bros, but please be more professional in trying to communicate and onboard the devs. You like the tech and someone launched the token? Trade it for your liking, but don’t make it your lifes mission to harass the dev for endorsing it. If the community is good and well rallied, if the token is well launched and no bad actors are involved, you guys can professionally try to onboard the dev without harassing them, the endorsement will happen sooner or later. You have many examples right infront of your eyes in the form of $GITLAWB $KELLY and many others that weren’t a self launch but started as please bros and eventually got the full endorsement from the devs.
@0x_aped@ATBASHai@The_Pitch_Man You retards need to move to sol and spam their with your claiming shit. Just buy it if you like the tech. Dont be a bunch of annoying jeets
Pretty wild seeing people dump real utility and AI/RWA projects just to chase another hype coin getting soft-pushed by @blknoiz06 . Even @base seems to be leaning into it now.
@Base grew because builders focused on fundamentals and actual products — not meme rotations. It was starting to feel closer to a tech market than a casino chain.
If the goal is gambling on empty narratives, @solana already exists for that. Most people defending these plays are just protecting their bags until exit liquidity disappears. And just fyi, i do have a bag in $TSG since 35k. So before y’all come at me for calling these people out, hold your horses.
This cycle of hype over substance is getting exhausting and there’s a reason why most of us traders chose to stay on @base to trade and hold the actual utility tech rather than garbage memes being traded on Solana. @blknoiz06 you could do better with your shills tbh.
And here are a few other base plays we caught just for the record in case someone missed my earlier tweets 🤷🏻♂️ $GITLAWB $LFI $OPENHUMAN $AEON $HERMESOS
Here we are again at it, early, as always 🤷🏻♂️😈 $TSG $BASE
Accepting 3 more people with a good onchain track record to our small trading group on TG - https://t.co/jPzVdbCSyE
Of course. On the flip side though, Multiple agents and startups have been funded by a community launched token on base using @bankrbot which were eventually endorsed by the projects given the amount of fees and funding they generated for the projects just from trading volume, for example, GITLAWB, KELLY, MOLTBOOK and multiple others generating millions in volume and multiple 6 figures in just fees from the trading volume.
You can speak to @0xDeployer regarding the fundamentals of how this works and he can assist you better in understanding the dynamics. Also, Ignore the spam from the people harrasing you for claiming the token. Take your time in understanding the mechanics.
Solana traders often struggle on Base and mainnet because a totally different style of trading is required
Expecting to get a quick win after following a ping from a wallet tracker usually doesn’t work well on EVM chains because people strive to actually digest and understand the underlying thesis behind a coin before they buy
Someone you track buying something just gives you a simple data point that lacks context, and taking behavior on this notification alone is asinine
Fast-paced, mindless clicking is only a winning strategy when all participants are on the same page buying memes left and right
In places where people use their brains, this type of trading leads to gut-wrenching fumbles and nightmare-inducing fades
To be rewarded on Base and mainnet, you need to actually have conviction and hold when it’s tough to do so
Rushing to enter is pointless, you’re way better off conducting as much research as possible and making a decision from there, because a true gem takes time to be seen as one, and those who understand will hold alongside you
Even in the rare occasions where coins ended up increasing drastically in a day or two - you still had several hours to gather info on them and understand each one’s bullcase