💥All those who have been playing the separatist tune on Kashmir for years must educate themselves about our history and mind business with respect to their own faultlines first.
The US and the UK have been at the forefront for decades in interfering in the internal affairs of Asian countries.
The SC/ST Act used against Ajeet Bharti is draconian
RT if you support him and if you want amendments in the SC/ST Law
This case should be made an example of how the SC/ST Act is misused
"Yet another year where around 40+ countries like Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Singapore, China and even Russia will welcome the year 2026 ahead of India
This once again demonstrates that Prime Minister Modi has failed the nation, and he should step down."
पद्मजा जी ने गर्दा उड़ा दिया! बहुत अच्छी धुलाई। सामान्यतः पत्रकारों से भावनाओं को परे रख कर बोलने की आशा की जाती है, परंतु कुछ विषय ऐसे होते हैं जिसमें तर्क के अलावा कोई दूसरा पक्ष होता ही नहीं। वहाँ आपकी अभिव्यक्ति उग्र होनी ही चाहिए, पैशन दिखना ही चाहिए।
The India-Pak match is a blot on our fight against terror and an insult to sacrifices of Indian soldiers. It’s been days that a few of us have been raising their voices against this step by @BCCI, sponsors, players and promoters. Just a thank you 🫡 post to those who are keeping this fight on relentlessly:
@major_pawan@TinyDhillon@ajeetbharti@megirish2001@Incognito_qfs@vijaygajera@wokeflix
Maybe missed a few others. And not listing the ‘jumping on trend influencers and timepass politicians’. But thanks to all others too. Hope someone wakes up to reality ! 🙏
Jai Hind 🇮🇳
The claim circulating on social media—that Pakistan successfully inserted a clause into a United Nations condemnation resolution on the Pahalgam attack, asserting that "the terrorists did not kill after asking about religion," by presenting statements from Indian opposition leaders as evidence—is not substantiated by credible sources.
What Is Verified:
Pahalgam Attack Details: On April 22, 2025, a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians. Indian authorities, including External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, have linked the attack to Pakistan-based terror groups and highlighted the religious targeting of victims.
UN Security Council's Response: The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) condemned the Pahalgam attack. However, the language of the condemnation was reportedly softened due to interventions by Pakistan and China. Notably, the final statement did not explicitly name Pakistan or reference the religious targeting aspect of the attack.
China's Role: China, a permanent member of the UNSC with veto power, has historically supported Pakistan in international forums. In this instance, China reportedly backed Pakistan's efforts to dilute the language of the UNSC's condemnation statement.
Unverified Claims:
Use of Indian Opposition Leaders' Statements: There is no credible evidence to support the claim that Pakistan presented tweets or videos from Indian opposition leaders, such as Pawan Khera, Supriya Shrinet, Akhilesh Yadav, or Siddaramaiah, as evidence to influence the UNSC's resolution language.
Insertion of Specific Clauses: No official records or reputable news sources confirm the inclusion of a clause stating "the terrorists did not kill after asking about religion" in the UNSC's condemnation resolution.
Conclusion:
While it's accurate that the UNSC's condemnation of the Pahalgam attack was less direct than previous statements, and that Pakistan and China played roles in influencing its language, the specific claims about Pakistan using Indian opposition leaders' statements to insert particular clauses into the resolution are unverified and lack credible sourcing.
It's essential to approach such sensitive topics with caution and rely on information from reputable sources to avoid the spread of misinformation.
Based on a shared post.
In the condemnation resolution presented by the United Nations on the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan was successful in getting a clause inserted that
"The terrorists did not kill after asking about religion...!"
To do this, Pakistan showed the tweets and videos of 12 opposition leaders of India as evidence,
which included the statements of Congress's chief spokesperson "Pawan Khera" and "Supriya Shrinet", Samajwadi Party's "Akhilesh Yadav", Congress's big leader Karnataka Chief Minister "Siddaramaiah" and other opposition leaders.
After that, China (which has veto power) got this clause removed from the condemnation resolution of the United Nations that "The Muslim terrorists killed after asking about religion...!"
What ever is stated is used by enemies to score. And embarrass one’s own
All is on record and retrievable.
If you do not share, then many countrymen will not even know about this.🙏🏿
हिंदी राजभाषा है लेकिन इसके बावजूद कल भाजपा युवा मोर्चा के तेजस्वी सूर्य ने जिस प्रकार हिंदी का अपमान किया है उससे तो हम यही कहेंगे #हिन्दी_का_अपमान_नहीं_सहेगा_हिन्दुस्तान