Update on the Ramp equity grants for early hires. Got an anonymous tip that the first product designer at Ramp (within first 5 hires), received 0.25% over 4 years for their initial grant.
That’s ~24% under the low end I originally modeled for hire #5, so my estimates ran high. That 0.25% would be worth ~$28.5M at Ramp today.
I reached out to @Matthewschulman and @rithikaneti at @pavecomp, and they pulled their data on equity grants across US VC-backed tech companies (chart below).
Among the first 5 employees, 0.25% sits above the median (0.16%) but below the 75th percentile (0.42%). For a product designer in the first 5, it lines up almost exactly with the 75th percentile.
And more importantly, benchmarks for “founding” roles are a bit more of an art rather than a science this early in hiring, since grants can be ultra-specific to individuals and their worth to the organization.
It can change with role, seniority, stage, growth etc, so I wouldn’t treat it as prescriptive.
It’s also just a bet on the company from the candidate’s perspective, and sometimes employers will need to flex to close a stellar candidate.
Hope my post helped shed some light on what outcomes can look like at a high growth startup, post-dilution.
Some more exciting updates coming soon between @pavecomp + @Levelsfyi. This post sparked some awesome discussion, and there’s a lot of neat data between the two of our platforms 📊
Anthropic just published its own workforce data showing the decline in junior share across its technical teams
At 10K+ companies in @pavecomp data, this trend is consistent
If entry-level roles keep shrinking, who’s being trained to replace today’s senior talent?