@japan_nobunaga The problem comes from business owners not paying a living wage. Please research the history of tipping in the US. You will be surprised.
Christian hate-preacher Aaron Thompson delivered an 80-minute rant against LGBTQ people.
Here's a short compilation of his vile statements. (I wore out my bleep button.)
Try That in A Small Town
Brandon Teena
Small Town: Humboldt, Nebraska. Population 800
Tried: Crossed the line by Being himself, a transgender person on Dec 31, 1993.
Result: Violently raped, brutally murdered. Shot in the stomach, then stabbed in the chest after he twitched. #BoysDontCry.
"You cross that line, it won't take long
For you to find out, I recommend you don't
Try that in a small town"
h/t @sodamncoolsmom , @RalphPagan345
BREAKING: The Cuban restaurant in Miami that hosted Donald Trump’s post-arraignment campaign stop is hit with devastating news as its longtime Cuban customers launch a boycott against it for hosting “a criminal who endangered our national security.”
But it gets even better…
The leaders of the boycott blasted Trump, declaring that, “It’s not as if he was charged with breaking a dish in the White House. He was charged with putting the national security of the United States in danger.”
One of the leaders, who migrated to Miami from Cuba to flee Castro’s regime, declared that the restaurant hosting Trump was “an insult to the country that took us in.”
Another longtime Cuban regular of the restaurant, Versailles restaurant in Little Havana, declared, “I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to go back there again. Trump is not just a regular politician. He’s a criminal It was all for show and it was a betrayal. He claims to be anti-communist, but in every other way, he’s a wannabe dictator.”
Another Cuban regular took aim at Trump and his supporters, declaring that, “Trump’s supporters look like they’re possessed. We’ve seen these ‘rallies’ before. Fidel Castro did it.”
Please retweet and ❤️ if you support this boycott — and consider investing in Tribel, a “woke” new Twitter competitor that is currently doing a round of equity crowdfunding and just blew past $1.3 million raised from 3,400 of its users. If you want to own a small piece of what is quickly becoming the “next big thing” in social media, here is the link to do so, https://t.co/7S6ULL2pfG. You can invest as little as $100 — or as much as you’d like. Here’s the link to download the new Tribel app that Elon Musk is so afraid of: https://t.co/HnJzSKj4Hp
#exChristian The Gospel of John is one of the clearest and best examples of how the Jesus story gets better with each passing decade after his death.
What’s In John’s Gospel But Not in Matthew, Mark, or Luke?
Referring to Jesus, the Gospel of John opens with, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” — No birth of Jesus stories in John.
The Gospel of John emphasizes the divinity of Jesus more explicitly than the other three Gospels. John highlights the "I AM" statements of Jesus, where he declares his divine identity and purpose. For example, Jesus says, “I and the Father are one,” "I am the bread of life," "I am the light of the world," "I am the way, the truth, and the life," and "I am the resurrection and the life." These statements emphasize Jesus's unique relationship with God the Father and his role as the source of eternal life, and they are absent from the other three Gospels. And only in John’s Gospel do we read, “You must be born again.”
3 Important Questions
Question: Why did the writers of Matthew, Mark, and Luke — over and over again —leave out so many of the most important words and actions of Jesus that are included in John?
Answer: Matthew, Mark, and Luke left out key words and events included in Johns Gospel because these things didn’t happen.
Question: Does the Gospel of John embellish the story of Jesus?
Answer: Yes, the Gospel of John embellishes and improves the story of Jesus 65 or more years after Jesus died.
Question: Was the Gospel of John written by one of the original 12 disciples, “the disciple whom Jesus loved”?
Answer: No. The author of John’s Gospel wants the reader to believe this book was written by the John who was one of the 3 leaders — Peter, James, and John — of the original 12 disciples. A case can be made that the last chapter of John was added later to bolster this authorship claim. But the assertion that this John wrote this Gospel requires us to believe that one of 12 disciples watched the growing Christian movement exist with no written, authoritative record of many of the most important actions and words of Jesus for 65 years or more, then, in his 80s or 90s, decided to write these things down. Logic dictates that’s not what happened. Someone else wrote the New Testament book of John, and this author gave the world a new, improved Jesus — pre-existent, one with the Father, fully God, raising a man buried for four days to live again, proclaiming himself as THE way, truth, and life, emphasizing a heavenly kingdom more than an earthly one, and calling individuals to be born again.
And who said Christians don't believe in evolution? #TheEvolvingGospelStory