◖Maw◗

addicted to being me

[dead domain (OF 50% OFF 🏳️‍🌈) @DomainDead]

Noooo haha Hunter Schaffer don’t get me ahhhh don’t chase me hahaha that would be sooooo scaryyyy

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Go to jail for 3 years or untill ur mom finishes elden ring

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Filler episode fr

[Jeff @JeffFcb14]

Ghana-Panama

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

THANK YOU SANTA MONICA 🙏😭 TS SHIT GON BE FIREEEEEEEEEEE #AIRCOMBOS

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Hoy me dio por mezclar deep house

https://t.co/8EV7owGFXF

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

“When im no longer president i’ll escape to pdfland so i can inyect myself with some V1 and trully become the ultimate lawless super villain I was meant to be”

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

They also mogged Erin Moriarty one last time

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

The boys was so ass they had to give us a reminder of when it wasnt ass so we wouldnt think so ass of their lazy ass final seasons.

[Haydn, 🇵🇸 @bilbosfootcomb]

What if the pope told you to love your neighbor as yourself and care for the poor

[Blake ™ @NeilNevins]

i know we're already way beyond the pale, but in any normal society, this should be pitchforks and torches type stuff

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Man fuck the boys what even, why, why on earth. Srsy what happened. What the fuck???

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

@lairssaa Larissa 😭

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Jueves por la noche y solo me motiva el olor a malboro rojo y madera empapada de cerveza

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

@lairssaa No seas ñaña

[Rekha Chandiramani @rekhapacitando]

Estados Unidos obligó a Mulino a salirse de la Ruta de la Seda.... para entrar ellos! 🫠

[Héctor B. M. @uprazhneniye]

Trump ha llevado consigo a China a la élite corporativa estadounidense, reforzando la teoría marxista que demuestra cómo el Estado capitalista no es otra cosa que el consejo de administración que gestiona los intereses de la burguesía.

[◖Maw◗ @rlpanama]

Huevo de airfryer