Abhijeet Dipke will never attend interview with her 🚨
Reporter: Abhijeet sir, you keep saying India needs a young PM and that Narendra Modi is not fit. On what basis are you saying this?
Abhijeet Dipke: See, India is a young country. Average age is 28-29. Modi is 75. How can old leaders understand youth problems? We need young energy.
Reporter: Okay. Then tell me one thing — who elected him? The same young voters you talk about. In 2014, 2019 and 2024, people of India gave him clear majority.
Abhijeet Dipke: I am not talking about election. I am talking about fitness. He is making reels, acting like influencer…
Reporter: So according to you, if a leader connects with youth through social media, he becomes unfit? Then every young leader who uses Instagram should also leave politics? And you yourself became famous only because of social media. Is that also wrong?
Abhijeet Dipke: No, no… I mean he should leave the chair and become full-time influencer.
Reporter: Interesting. You worked with AAP for years. Did you ever say the same thing about Arvind Kejriwal when he was getting older? Or only when the leader is from BJP? Why this selective talk?
Abhijeet Dipke: I am talking about system. Paper leaks happened, unemployment is there…
Reporter: Paper leak is a serious issue, no doubt. But after protests, the Education Minister resigned. That is accountability. Now tell me — in the last 10 years, how many free houses, toilets, gas connections, bank accounts and vaccination drives happened under this government? Can you deny these numbers, or will you only talk about problems and ignore all work?
Abhijeet Dipke: Work is there but youth is frustrated…
Reporter: Frustration is real but frustration alone does not make someone the next PM. You are asking for young leadership. Fine. Then name three young leaders from your side who have run a state, managed a budget of lakhs of crores handled national security or won people’s trust in multiple elections. Can you name even one?
Abhijeet Dipke: We need to create that space…
Reporter: Exactly,First create that space through hard work and elections. Don’t just sit on social media and declare that the elected PM is not fit. Democracy is not decided by who speaks louder. It is decided by who people vote for. Right now people have already given their answer three times. Your opinion is fine but it is still just an opinion.
Abhijeet Dipke: Goes Completely silent 😶.
I know I am going to get some "don't spread hate" comments from KMs.
Ironic isn't it 🤣.
But let me tell you Al-Takiya is a norm, lying is a norm, victim card is a norm, diluting our genocide, name calling us is a norm, calling us cowards is a norm and calling us Islamaphobes is a norm.
I don't care about being called a phobe, my guards are up and I have lost so much in past. I would be an idiot not to fear this ideology which says kafirs need to convert ,leave or die.
Not to forget innings played by Syersh Iyer .. Hats off .. Thanks for being part of a fabulous team .. King kohli Shami the destroyer and Shreys the pusher . Rohit & Gill Incaitor..Rahul the finisher
Love u team India
Least but not out of any game my favorite Sir Jadeja
Tried to think objectively about Khalistani separatists and their hate for Hindus:
Can still understand their anger against the Indian state for events in 1980s but totally can't understand their hate for Hindus.
What have Hindus done to them? They say Op Bluestar. Bluestar was right or wrong is highly subjective but if they feel it was wrong, it was done by the Indian govt of that time, not Hindus. A govt that was voted to power by everyone, not just Hindus. In fact, Sikhs voted for them. 12 out of 13 seats in Punjab went to Congress in Lok Sabha, 1980. Punjab voted for Indira Gandhi wholeheartedly. So what's the point of blaming Hindus for Bluestar when it was done by a govt that you yourself voted for? In fact, you have forgiven Congress by electing them again and again after Bluestar, but your anger towards Hindus persists. What logic is this?
Second point. 1984 Genocide. It was not done by Hindus. It was done by Congress workers who, incidentally, were mostly Hindus. They didn't do it for religion; they did it for their party loyalty. Till 1984, there were innumerable incidents of selective targeting of Hindus in Punjab. Trains stopped, buses stopped, lined up, and killed. Temples damaged. Cows killed. No Hindu took up a weapon against you. Do you think that a Hindu, who didn't pick up a weapon even when they were killed, their worship place destroyed, and their religion mocked, will pick up a weapon because you killed the prime minister? No. That was Congress and their workers. But again, you've forgiven them, and your anger against Hindus persists for no reason.
Hindus were the victims of what happened in Punjab between 1979 and 1992, but nobody even cares to discuss it. Hundreds killed. Temples destroyed. They were targeted for no fault of theirs, and even to this date, there is no remorse in the minds of the killers for it. In fact, they have only been demonized on the contrary.
That's why modern Hindu is fed up. Tired of pondering why there's so much hatred, weary of justifying why such animosity shouldn't exist. Consequently, they've grown indifferent or simply stopped caring. The reverence for Gurus and Sikhi remains of utmost importance. Simultaneously, any condescending attitude from anyone is no longer welcomed.
India becomes the first nation to touch the south pole of the moon with the success of the #Chandrayaan3 Mission.
The new space odyssey flies India's celestial ambitions to newer heights, setting it apart as the world's launchpad for space projects.
Unlocking a gateway to space for Indian companies, it will create a plethora of employment opportunities for our youths.