ceo @justaname_id @_JAW_ID
prev: early/founding team @AxiomZenTeam (parent of Cryptokitties / Dapper Labs); cf @ZenhubHQ & @klktnofficialJP (acq. by Animoca)
Thanks to @ethereumfndn’s Trillion Dollar Security Initiative, EIP-7730 landed yesterday and of course, adoption started right away.
Every app built with JAW now has it alongside batched calls, interop addresses, and stablecoin gas 🫡
https://t.co/QbigM7U20q
Thanks to @ethereumfndn’s Trillion Dollar Security Initiative, EIP-7730 landed yesterday and of course, adoption started right away.
Every app built with JAW now has it alongside batched calls, interop addresses, and stablecoin gas 🫡
https://t.co/QbigM7U20q
@oguzerkan I wish it was an easy call… but $CRWV is that discounted because their debt metrics are just as ridiculous.
I wouldn’t wait 2030 for things to settle re interest payments, in a market that does not look so healthy
Our programmable permissions and delegated features enable our users to implement policies for their agents onchain.
Really not the same feature as your basic privy or other KMS wallets 'policies'.
We're built different.
The first AI agents that can actually move money without being a security disaster are the ones running inside scoped permissions.
With JAW CLI, your agent proposes the transaction, you approve with a fingerprint. That way, the AI can't hallucinate past a permission grant 😏
Get started now 👉 npx skills add JustaName-id/jaw-skills --skill jaw-cli
You can finally say this without being canceled: AI isn't creating a Cambrian explosion of apps, if anything it's holding app creation back.
Earlier tech waves had 'the mythical man-month'. Our generation has 'the mythical AI engineer' who magically turns enormous token usage into equally enormously-adopted products.
Well, where are the apps and new businesses then? Because compared to prior cycles (e.g. the mobile app boom starting in 2010 or so), right now seems positively sterile, app and UX-wise. Other than Claude or ChatGPT itself, name a new app you use now you weren't already using five years ago?
It's a truism of tech that throwing more people and time at a product often results in only lack of focus, confusion, and yet more code to support.
This is the parable of the company that over-raised and over-hired and grew too quickly, and now has lots of mediocre, weakly-adopted products, internal communication problems, distracted leadership, code bloat, technical debt...and so the spiral begins, which ends with an apologetic CEO post after some layoffs announcing "we're refocusing on our core customer".
Every tech company announcing they're either lowering token caps or shifting to lower-priced models is essentially saying: "we o̵v̵e̵r̵-̵h̵i̵r̵e̵d̵ over-spent on tokens, and are scaling back to focus on our core product" blah blah blah...same same.
It's the corporate version of someone using AI to write a long email, someone else using AI to summarize it, and both sides would have been better off just writing a shorter email. But now, even small companies can have that same problem thanks to AI.
I refuse to believe that an LLM prompt is the teleological endpoint of human interaction with computer intelligence. The fact we've apparently recrudesced to CLIs, like me farting around with RedHat 7.1 in 2001, feels like a step back. Another world here has to be possible, and while I have every faith (as someone as deep in AI psychosis as the next person) that AI can help get us out of it...just racking up tokens costs isn't how we get there.
The AI Jesus isn't coming to save us, human taste, discernment, and radical re-invention will. Like Kafka wrote in his notebooks: "The messiah will come only when he is no longer necessary; he will come only on the day after his arrival; he will come, not on the last day, but on the very last.”
Neobanks cash back is basically a distribution subsidy to gain market shares in a saturated market, where most products are not able to offer more than a nice UI wrapped on a basic wallet, with a Rain card integration.
It’s gonna be a bad red ocean if builders aren’t getting more creative very soon
@strato_money How can it be a moat if it is systematically subsidized by investors capital, token sales, or even (i once heard) ecosystem grants?
It’s an expensive CAC approach, not a product moat!
This is what gets built when @ensdomains registration is a single function call. Names aren't metadata here. They're what gave these agents a story worth following.
One prompt to Claude. It ran JAW’s CLI and just like that, 10 Agents went to battle. 🧵
Each one claimed its ENS name.
USDC on base.
Then they invented something like mercy on their own.
I didn't code it. I didn't ask for it.
Onchain adoption is slowed more by user experience than by technology. https://t.co/nL7nPMDGge removes friction with passkey smart accounts, gasless ENS identity, and self-custody for smooth onboarding and transactions.
Retail users do not want to hear about swapping, bridging, that part needs to be abstracted away completely if we want internet consumers to go onchain.
Wouldn’t you agree that users shouldn't need to buy ETH to move USDC?
With https://t.co/kxxbpKiWFF, they pay gas in the stablecoin they're already holding, OR you can sponsor it entirely for them with a paymaster and they pay nothing at all.
Either way, we made sure the "go buy ETH first" onboarding step is dead.
Get started now on https://t.co/91AW2QaWjq 😎
Ever wanted to tell your AI "send 50 USDC to alice.eth" and have it just work?
The JAW CLI makes it real: your agent proposes the transaction, you approve with a fingerprint, it ships. Done.
Install it 👉 npx skills add JustaName-id/jaw-skills --skill jaw-cli
Learn more on our docs: https://t.co/VlBu7aq9iB
@defyneric I can see the value in building consumer finance products for the HL traders, on their native ecosystem.
But product-wise, feels like the requirements are very different when you want users to lock as much wealth as possible with you (invest), vs spending this money!