🚨 BREAKING - ERIKA KIRK UNLEASHES, DEFIANT: "They should all know this. If you THOUGHT that my husband's mission was powerful before? You have NO IDEA. You have no idea what you've just unleashed across this entire country, and this world. You have no idea the fire you've ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry."
"The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no IDEA what they have done. They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God's merciful love."
"The movement will NOT DIE. I refuse to let that happen."
"All of us will refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband's name, and I will make sure of it. It will become stronger, bolder, louder, and greater than ever."
So lemme get this straight
A group of legislators—many of whom conveniently own Meta stock—come together in a rare bipartisan effort to ban its main competitor?
Did I get that right?
The Supreme Court upholds the TikTok Ban
Many members of Congress bought META stock as they were voting to ban TikTok, they’re getting rich while eliminating their donors competition
Congressman Michael McCaul who wrote The TikTok Ban Bill invested $1.15 Million into META after writing the bill
- On March 3rd, he authored the TikTok Ban Bill
- On March 22nd, he invested $150,000 in META
- On the 26th, he invested another $150,000
- On the 28th, he invested another $150,000
So about three weeks after writing the TikTok Ban Bill, this man invested $450,000 in TikTok's competitor.
Oh, and then what did he do once he saw his TikTok ban was gonna be included with all the Ukraine funding:
- Well, on April 1st, he invested $350,000 more in META, followed by the fifth where he invested that again.
Then about a week later, of course, he voted yes on the bill he wrote.
So within the span of 40 days, this dude wrote the TikTok ban bill, proceeded to invest $450,000 in the competitor, and then invested another $700,000, taking his total investment and META at a $1.15 million.
And then he voted yes. Now, obviously the word most people are using here is suspicious, but the word we should be using is criminal.
This man wrote the f***** bill to ban TikTok, proceeded to invest more than a million dollars in its competitor, whose stock will skyrocket if TikTok actually gets banned, and then voted on the bill to ban it.
Are you paying attention yet?” #tiktokban
It’s all about censorship.
Just a psa: If banning TikTok was about national security, the government wouldn't have allowed China to buy a ton of farmland bordering our military bases.
Let that sink in.
Senator Rand Paul says the real reason for the TikTok Ban was censorship
🚨 He EXPOSES TikTok even offered to have an American Board and host its data right here in the United States and was DECLINED
“I do believe that banning a social media app like TikTok is a violation of the First Amendment”
“Very disappointed. 170 million Americans expressed themselves on TikTok on a daily basis, and it's just wrong for the government to ban it.”
“They've actually offered through our foreign investment committee that oversees foreign investments, they've offered to have the data here.
They've offered to work with Oracle to house the data in the United States. They've offered to have an American board.”
“In fact, it's misreported that it's a Chinese company to begin with. It's owned 60% of the company. It's owned by international investors.”
If the TikTok Ban was really about data security Congress could have just passed new data laws. It was always about censorship.
I agree with my senator @RandPaul that banning TikTok is an infringement on our first amendment rights.
170 million people and businesses across America use the app for advertising - political content- to just people sharing their everyday life.
Many believe that because it is owned by the Chinese that we are compromised.
Are we compromised by the clothing on our backs - by the phones we are on- by the many electronics we use in our homes daily.
Most apps ( including this one) often share data.
The ban is far more sinister than what the government was you to know.
If we allow such a ban - where would it stop 🧐
Trump: "The sky is blue"
Moderator: "Well actually, that is false. A study says that the sky is green."
Kamala: "The moon is made of cheese"
Moderator: "Ok, next question"