My father is in Kyiv right now and sending Air Alert updates to the family group chat in the same way he shares a cool item he found on Facebook marketplace, like it's nbd.
@mathewi@GK_Fellows ‘Cus let me tell yah, these strong brow ridges of mine are a pretty strong indicator that Homo sapiens had no such aversion to other activities with something that looked like them but wasn’t
@benbawan That isn't to say it's inherently better, and I can get the argument for prioritizing large numbers of asylum seekers. I just think it represents a different sort of activivity and prioritization by governments - resettlement has to be highly intentional vs. responsive.
@benbawan But it's also, to a certain extent, a question of "dealing with a situation" that is partly (mostly?) outside a receiving country's control. It's an issue of responsive policy vs. proactive policymaking.
By contrast, resettlement is an active "reaching out" into the world.
Just to be clear, I’m not arguing with @AlexNowrasteh.
The point is that you don’t have to host immigrants to be in favour of immigration. The cool part is that even if that were somehow a valid objection, plenty of people do, in fact, want to host immigrants and refugees!
The beautiful part regarding the point Alex is rebutting here is the existence of programs like private sponsorship, where thousands of people are, in fact, happy to have house refugees each year.
Private sponsors in Alberta resettled more refugees than New York or Pennsylvania combined last year, in a province that is 1/8 their population.
https://t.co/HMw6cq9lOv
Does the US have "open borders"? In my new paper, I provide the 1st-ever look at total green card requests over time. Since 1922, every year, most applicants didn't receive green cards. In 2024, just 3% will receive a green card, down from 99% in 1890. https://t.co/eRmnCOXQ6c