Rob Dobbins

Christian, Husband, Father, Friend, Minister, Missionary, Citizen/Patriot/American, Portfolio/Program/Project/PMO Manager

[Rob Dobbins @robdobbins]

I’ve never read something as concisely written yet includes the critical message as this. Please at least read the first two paragraphs.

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

The Federal Takedown in Ohio: What Happened

On Thursday, June 11, the FBI deployed over 100 federal agents across Ohio in a massive, coordinated fraud operation.

• The Corporate Search: Federal agents executed a search warrant at the Cleveland headquarters of the Ohio Organizing Collaborative (OOC), a massive third-party operation responsible for statewide voter registration drives. Agents spent hours seizing office servers, local laptops, mobile devices, and physical documentation tracking recent registration pipelines.
• Domestic Interceptions: Simultaneously, tactical federal teams deployed to question field staff, regional canvassers, and executive leaders. Staff were questioned directly - regarding the group's data collection and signature gathering methods.
• The Root Cause: The operation follows massive fraud-related referrals. Federal prosecutors are tracking these pipelines to determine how many third-party groups are driving ineligible names onto the official state database.

This isn't an isolated incident. It’s part of a sweeping multi-state federal playbook. The DOJ has already seized 2024 ballot records in Wayne County (MI), taken 2020 materials out of Fulton County (GA) and Maricopa County (AZ), and subjected election workers in Milwaukee County (WI) to aggressive federal questioning.

What federal investigators are finding on the ground is exactly what Unite4Freedom (U4F) has been demonstrating with hard data for three years.

Unregulated, aggressive third-party registration programs are one of the sources of the messy data plaguing American elections. When organizations rely on independent contractors, quotas, or volume-based incentives, it creates an environment that breeds duplicate records, unverified identities, and illegal or invalid registrations.

What the U4F State Scorecards Show

Our data forensic teams at Unite4Freedom have completed exhaustive, line-by-line analyses of voter registration snapshots across 35 states so far. The scorecards for each state tell the exact same story:

• Mass Inaccuracies: Hundreds of thousands of records feature invalid addresses, impossible birthdays, missing critical identifiers, and active registrations for individuals who have moved or passed away.

The Bottom Line: Oversight is Not Optional

The federal raids in Ohio prove that the status quo is completely unsustainable. We cannot have a secure system when outside groups can freely pump unverified information into public databases.

Strict oversight and relentless accountability are the only ways to ensure our voter rolls are properly and transparently maintained. Clean rolls are the foundation of a trust-worthy system.

When we enforce strict data standards and eliminate third-party injections, we ensure a simple, necessary standard:

...that only eligible, legal voters have the opportunity to cast a ballot.

#ElectionValidity
#DataForensics
#VoterRolls
#U4F

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

We have the actual evidence to support your assertion. Just look at our California Election Validity Scorecards for 2022 and 2024.

We could certainly use your help in exposing it to all of America, so that everyone understands the problems in our elections, but more importantly that we encourage them them to speak out in calling for legitimate representation.

DM us and we'll share how you can help. Thank you for you attention to this matter.

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

BREAKING CALIFORNIA ELECTION NEWS!! 18,000 BALLOTS HAVE BEEN REJECTED BASED ON SIGNATURE – STEALING THE ELECTION FROM SPENCER PRATT

OR did they? – perhaps this post should be titled…

BREAKING NEWS – INFLUENCERS PUT CLICKS BEFORE TRUTH – HARMING THE ELECTION CONVERSATION MORE THAN HELPING!!

Word around the internet lately, particularly in the “Election Integrity Influencer” circles, is that 18,000 Spencer Pratt voters have received letters telling them that their vote was ‘thrown out’ due to ‘signature irregularities’.

So, let's look at the claim first – is it true?

Short answer, No it is not true. How can I say this with certainty? Well, let's look at California law and the currently ‘in-flight’ election results.

California uses signature verification to identify voters even in person – we’ll talk more about this in a minute.

Mail-in ballots can only rely on your signature because you have mailed it in. You’re not there to provide anything else. So, CA law has responded to that with one of the most ‘friendly’ ballot curing laws around. What is does is gives every voter weeks to respond if there is a problem with their signature.

So, could people have received letters from the state or their county about their signature on a mail-in ballot? YES
Did the letter say we don’t like your signature, so we are throwing your ballot away? NO

If they got a letter, it instructed them about how to ‘cure’ their ballot and the deadline for that for the CA primary election of June 2nd, is June 24th. They would also get a form to fill out and return to resolve the problem. Very convenient – too convenient – still not protecting our elections.

For this post though – it is most important to understand that they did not get a letter telling them their ballot had been discarded. Actually even if they did, they could go to the California elections page and get the instructions to fix it.

So this claim…

“18,000 SPENCER PRATT BALLOTS HAVE BEEN THROWN AWAY” is not true

Let’s get back to the second title on this post. Why is this even a story at all right now – it is because influencers want to capture your attention and your click. Sensational news gains followers. Verifying sensational news is usually challenging and in the landscape of social media, most are scrolling from one idea to the next and they don’t take the time to go ‘look it up’.

THIS IS DANGEROUS

It is dangerous for the truth, and it spreads ideas that are false, making everyone pursuing legitimate claims about election validity look like our claims are bogus and exaggerated - when they are not.

You have heard this many times in the last 6 years in particular…

BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW

and… DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH

This is as relevant now as ever.

The research is not always easy, but you need to do it. Do it for the info we post too. We don’t want blind followers. In fact, since our work is backed by years of data analysis by a team of about 100 Data engineers, architects and analysts, we WANT you to check our work.

To confirm what we say above, check out the link below…

Go to the CA voting website. Click on the link for the June 2, 2026 Primary, Click the link that says ‘How to Fix a Missing or Noncomparable Signature on Your Vote-by-Mail Ballot Return Envelope’ – it’s all there in black and white.

…and when you see someone posting about the 18,000 deleted votes – spread the truth – the real truth and help others not be fooled.

A quick extra note about ‘signature verification’ in lieu of ID – this is another reason why it poses a problem for our elections. The focus is usually that it does not properly protect the act of voting in the first place, but this story (even though it is bogus) shines a light on the fact that using your signature does introduce subjectivity into the process of accepting votes. A huge problem! We’ll post more on this soon.

Follow us for more truth about elections.

Here's that link...

https://t.co/XHURw56wbW.

#U4F
#ElectionValidity
#BeCarefulWhoYouFollow

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 WOW! President Trump just ADDED the SAVE AMERICA ACT to his $350 billion Pentagon reconciliation package, which only needs a SIMPLE MAJORITY (50+JD Vance) to pass

"I am hereby calling on Republicans in Congress to IMMEDIATELY advance and pass the forthcoming $350 Billion Reconciliation Bill (Recon 3.0) — which, at the request of our Great Department of War — will include THE SAVE AMERICA ACT as well. No games, no delays, and no weak compromises! Do this ASAP."

"Pass ALL $350 BILLION and THE SAVE AMERICA ACT to secure the NATION for our children and grandchildren." 🇺🇸

Fire the parliamentarian so she can't strike it down!

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

@JustineBateman Unite4Freedom analysts have measured California's elections against the law, and this is what it looked like in 2022 and 2024. There is no reason to think anything has improved.👇👇👇

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

WARNING: Congress Just Quietly Starved Our Election Security - Right Before the Midterms

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was established for a singular, vital purpose: to serve as the critical oversight body that facilitates, guides, and helps execute valid, legally compliant election processes across America. Yet behind closed doors, House appropriators are driving an agenda that starves the EAC down to a lean baseline budget, explicitly ZEROING OUT essential federal infrastructure grant programs for states.

Compounding the crisis, CISA is simultaneously shifting policy - cutting budgets and moving to discontinue direct election security support services. This leaves local jurisdictions completely stranded right as the midterm cycle accelerates and sophisticated, AI-driven threats mount.

When you systematically defund the oversight and infrastructure required to ensure valid elections, you aren't saving tax dollars - you are demonstrating a profound lack of priority for valid elections.

Undercutting the bedrock of our election compliance isn't fiscal conservatism; it's structural negligence.

We discussed in yesterday’s posts that the FBI is stepping up to enforce election law and drive accountability. Meanwhile Congress is undercutting the process from another angle.

Oversight demands funding, and validity requires infrastructure.

Stop playing politics with the foundations of our Republic.

#ElectionValidity
#EAC
#Accountability
#ElectionSecurity

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

The real reason they don’t want voter ID is to commit voting fraud. That is the obvious truth.

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

WAIT - YOU MEAN RED STATES ARE THE SAME AS BLUE STATES?

We have another question.

If a report identified more than 2 million apparent election errors using official state data, wouldn’t you expect election officials to immediately review it?

At Unite4Freedom, we analyzed official Texas voter roll and election records from both the 2022 and 2024 General Elections.

Our 2022 scorecard identified nearly 197,000 apparent voting violations.

Our 2024 scorecard identified more than 1.6 million votes that appear prohibited by law and over 2 million total election errors.

The data came from official sources. Our methodology is public. And we have repeatedly made ourselves available to explain exactly how the analysis was performed.

Yet no election official has contacted us to review, question, challenge, or refute our methodology.

Think about that.

If our findings are wrong, show us where.

If our methodology is flawed, let’s discuss it.

If our conclusions are incorrect, provide the evidence.

But ignoring the findings is not transparency.

Election integrity is not about politics. It’s about public confidence.

We believe every claim should be tested, every methodology should be scrutinized, and every election should be verifiable.

So we ask again:

Why has no election official reached out to examine findings of this magnitude?

The American people deserve answers.

#U4F
#Transparency
#RedvsBlue

[Franklin Graham @Franklin_Graham]

You have to be willing to repent and turn from your sins, and by faith believe on Jesus Christ to be saved. #ThursdayThoughts

[Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 @ProudElephant]

Good question… 🧐🧐🧐

[Unite4Freedom @Unite4Freedom]

The Illusion of Integrity: The Federal Court Ruled Paradox of "Self-Attestation"

A federal judge just struck down New Hampshire’s HB 1569, abolishing the requirement for physical proof of citizenship to register to vote and restoring the honor system of "self-attestation."

Let’s be clear about what self-attestation is: it’s a pinky promise. A person simply checks a box and signs a piece of paper swearing they are a citizen. No passport. No birth certificate. Just a signature.

In what other critical area of American life do we accept zero documentation? You cannot board a commercial airline flight, open a bank account, buy a firearm, drive a car, or even secure a marriage license without presenting hard, physical ID. None of these requirements are decried as "unjustifiable burdens."

Yet, when it comes to the ultimate foundation of our constitutional republic—the integrity of our ballot - showing a birth certificate is suddenly treated by federal courts as an unconstitutional roadblock. Why do we protect our elections with less vigor than a domestic flight?

Worse yet, if an individual "attests" to their citizenship via an affidavit without proving who they are via a secure, verified ID, whose identity are they actually attesting to? An honor system is entirely useless if you cannot flawlessly verify the actual identity of the person making the promise.

The ultimate double standard completely exposes the narrative. Critics are currently fighting the executive order on citizenship verification, screaming that comprehensive federal databases (like DHS and Social Security records) cannot be trusted because the data is "inaccurate" or "insufficiently documented."

Think about the staggering contradiction: They argue that secure, official government databases are too unreliable to verify citizenship, but an unverified signature on a blank piece of paper is perfectly adequate.

If rigorous federal records aren't accurate enough, how is a blind honor-system affidavit better?

The math doesn't add up. If we care about protecting the value of every legal vote, verification requires real documentation - not blind faith.

#ElectionValidity
#HB1569
#NewHampshire
#U4F

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

Voting is a right

And for precisely that reason, your vote should never be diluted by noncitizen voting

That’s why we need the SAVE America Act, which would protect your vote by making sure it’s not offset by noncitizens voting illegally

[Tom Fitton @TomFitton]

Judicial Watch Sues California to Clean Up 873,000 Inactive Voter Registrations on Rolls

(Washington, DC) – @JudicialWatch announced today it filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a California political candidate and a state political party against the State of California due to its failure to maintain accurate voter rolls as required by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) (Don Wagner et al. v. Shirley N. Weber, in her official capacity as California Secretary of State (No. 8:26-cv-01263)).

Federal law requires most inactive voter registrations to be removed after two general federal elections. The new federal lawsuit alleges, based on admissions in prior Judicial Watch litigation, that 873,092 voter registrations have remained continuously inactive for at least three federal elections, and some for much longer. Of these registrations, 326,808 have remained continuously inactive through at least three consecutive federal general elections, while 151,202 have remained inactive through at least four consecutive federal general elections.

In addition, 33,922 voter registrations have remained continuously inactive through at least five consecutive federal general elections — dating back at least ten years, to before the November 5, 2016, presidential election.

Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), states are required to make reasonable efforts to remove ineligible voters from the voter rolls, including those who have died or moved. The lawsuit also alleges, again citing admissions by California officials, that the state takes no effective action to require counties to comply with the NVRA. As a result, they do not comply.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Don Wagner, an elected member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors and candidate for California Secretary of State, and the American Independent Party of California.

In June 2025, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), as required by law, issued a report to Congress on states’ NVRA compliance. Citing this report, Judicial Watch points out that 20 California counties removed 50 or fewer inactive voters from their rolls between November 2022 and November 2024. Ten of these counties reported zero removals of inactives under the relevant statute during that time period. These include Alpine, Imperial, Inyo, Kings, Mariposa, Mendocino, Plumas, San Bernardino, Tehama, and Trinity. Counties reporting 50 or fewer removals include Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Santa Cruz, Siskiyou, Sonoma, and Tuolumne.

Judicial Watch argues:

The 20 counties reporting zero to 50 registrations pursuant to NVRA Section 8(d)(1)(B) during the period from November 2022 to November 2024 reported a combined total of 3,440,358 voter registrations to the EAC. Yet these 20 counties reported removing a grand total of just 218 registrations under that provision during that period.

For context, Judicial Watch points out that San Diego County, with 2.2 million registered voters, removed over 300,000 voter registrations under that statute during the same time period.

Currently, over 23 million Californians are registered to vote.

Additionally, Judicial Watch states that Census Bureau data shows: 660,000 California residents moved out of state in 2024;690,000 in 2023; and 818,000 in 2022.

Judicial Watch points out that if California “was actually conducting a general program that makes a reasonable effort to cancel the registrations of voters who have become ineligible because of a change of residence, it would not be possible” for these counties to cancel so few registrations under the NVRA in a two-year period.”

The lawsuit also notes that “comparing the total number of voter registrations reported to the EAC in each California county to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent five-year estimates of voting-age citizenry indicates that 18 California counties have more voter registrations than citizens over the age of eighteen.”

In March 2019, the State of California and Los Angeles County settled a December 2017 lawsuit with Judicial Watch that resulted in the removal of more than 1.2 million names from voter rolls.

“Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuit confirms California has a dirty voting rolls crisis – with thousands of old names on the rolls going back at least 10 years,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections. And California and its counties must take immediate steps to clean the over 870,000 dirty names on the voting lists.”

[Nick shirley @nickshirleyy]

Hey @Tim_Walz and @IlhanMN one of the biggest fraud bust in Minnesota history took place this week and you guys said nothing

Shouldn’t you guys celebrate when fraud is exposed in your state and district?

Or are you upset because it was exposed? Silence speaks volumes.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

You MUST vote for Steve Hilton to save California from the the filth, the crime, the fraud, the hobo camps, the needles - in short, from the Democrat agenda.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

What reason could these states have to refuse to share their voter-registration data with DOJ?

I can’t think of a legitimate one.

[Franklin Graham @Franklin_Graham]

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.” (2 Timothy 1:7) #Alaska

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

True

[Janie Johnson - America is Exceptional @jjauthor]

REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune
REMOVE RINO @LeaderJohnThune