Leo

Fools and their folly I will not suffer.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Gas masks...again 😅 Watching these masked up melts say "it reminds me of covid" is the ultimate "No shit, Sherlock" moment.

The virtue signalling is already peaking with teens chirping "I’m doing my part!" Pipe down, mush. This time around, you absolute dullards don't get to play "Good Citizen" while moralising your way toward jab injury.

Zero sympathy for anyone claiming side effects/jab injury this time - especially since meningitis is literally on the list of side effects from covid jabs.

If you're lining up for another round, you aren't a hero; you're just a slow learner. Already bored of this script...

[Latimer Alder @latimeralder]

POLL: Energy Security

Do you have confidence in Britain's Minister for Energy Secuity, Ed Miliband?

Please vote, comment and retweet

[N Ecc 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Neccccy]

True !!!

[Dave @DaveKent101]

So Iran has done the following to the UK:
- Financed Islamic extremism in the UK.
- Landed terrorists on UK shores via Channel dinghy.
- Attacked a UK base in Iraq with drones.
- Attacked a UK base in Cyprus with drones.
- Attacked and sunk British ships.

Why have we not banned the IRGC, expelled the Iranian embassy, and joined our ally America in fighting back?
🤔🤔🤔

The answer is the cowardly, duplicitous, and weak Labour government of Keir Starmer, whose civil servants attend anniversary dinners of the 1979 Islamic revolution at the Iranian embassy.
Starmer is a disgusting traitor.

[Katie Lam @Katie_Lam_MP]

If you're accused of 'hate speech', you're nearly twice as likely to be found innocent by a jury than if your case is just heard by a judge.

The British people know right from wrong.

It's a disgrace that this Government wants to cut them out of the justice system.

[Peter Bleksley @PeterBleksley]

The thing that hurts me most about the decline of this once-great nation, is how it’s lost its bottle.
Once upon a time we stood alone against the Nazis. With some very welcome help from our great friends, we sorted those wankers out.
Some years later, the Argentinians thought that they could take the piss out of us. Our heroes taught them otherwise, and many sacrificed their lives in the process. May they rest in peace. They will never be forgotten.
Naughty kids got detention.
Thieves and vagabonds got sent to prison.
Rough men caused aggravation in pubs at weekends. Rough Police officers turned up to sort them out. That included brilliant WPCs, who we were proud to call WPCs, and work alongside. Somewhere down the line, because of liberals, intellectuals and progressives, some people became too afraid to tell a bloke in a frock to fuck off out of the ladies toilets.
People in positions of authority became so timid, that they allowed people from lands far, far away, to besiege parts of our once green and pleasant land, to murder and rape our English roses, and to impose their barbaric ideology upon swathes of people too weak to resist.
We invented human rights laws, only for leaders who professed to advance such laws, to bottle out of helping a nation that wanted to irrevocably damage a regime that had no regard whatsoever for human rights laws. Oh the irony.
Fear not my friends, this nation is beginning to reconnect with the simple concept of having some bottle. The autocrats, the globalists, the spineless and the liars, together with all their acolytes, will one day soon be taught a very stern lesson.
Don’t say I don’t warn you…

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

📣🚨The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it.

This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history.

The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success.

“If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.”

Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000.

In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest.

The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds.

First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation.

Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'.

Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door.

This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on.

Donate to our crowdfunder below👇

[Jack Milton @Areopagiticus44]

⛔️ Blasphemy? Let's cut the crap. The British government just rolled out this new "non-statutory" definition of anti-Muslim hostility.

Sounds harmless, right? Just guidance to fight hate crimes.

But read it closely: it carves out special protections for one faith - Islam - while every other religion gets told to fend for itself.

Christians can have their crosses mocked, their beliefs called bigoted fairy tales, their churches vandalized, and nobody's rushing to codify a special "anti-Christian hostility" definition - they don't get their own government-endorsed shield.

But criticize Islam? Suddenly you're risking being labeled as encouraging "prejudicial stereotyping" or "hatred against a collective group." Even if you're just pointing out facts or debating ideas.

This isn't about stopping violence - violence is already illegal, and hate crimes against Muslims are prosecuted under existing laws.

This is about tilting the scales. It's favoritism dressed up as compassion.

And once you start giving one religion special status in law and policy, you're not protecting free speech - you're quietly importing a hierarchy where some beliefs are more equal than others.

We know where this road leads. Look at parts of Europe already: two-tier policing, speech codes that chill criticism of one faith while others get dragged through the mud.

It's not a slippery slope - it's a deliberate step toward a sectarian society, where the state picks winners in the marketplace of ideas.

And if we're not careful, Britain risks sliding from a free, pluralistic nation into something that looks a lot more like the theocratic systems some people fled to get here in the first place.

The elites will tell you it's just "guidance." Don't buy it.

This is how you erode liberty - one "non-statutory" definition at a time.

Wake up, Britain. Your freedoms are worth more than woke gesture politics from @UKLabour ⁉️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧👇

#FreeSpeech #UKPolitics #NoSpecialTreatment

[Leo @robert07059131]

@trpsowhat @Resisting313392 So retard, you’ve no evidence either. Just as we all know. You people are just desperate.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@hippyygoat @BARBARAKEDZIER1 Israel, the great protector.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@mehdizafar @paulturner2012 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I’m laughing too

[Leo @robert07059131]

@zainmankani @SuppressedNws1 @SuppressedNws Retard. Israel will live long after these kids are gone.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@DamianLow3 Weak at home and weak on the world stage when a real leader is needed.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@ProudSocialist You’re another retard https://t.co/cJQQp7eQru

[Matt Tardio @angertab]

The Nail In The Coffin For Iran

Now it's confirmed, based on the direction of attack, there is a 0% chance the USA fired a Tomahawk Cruise Missile at the "school" that the IRGC claims killed 165 people.

IMAGE 1
Even using Bellingcat's research, this stands up. According to them, and verified by geolocation, the video in question was taken from the south/southwest of the targeted building from across the street.

IMAGE 2
This means that the munition in question captured on video approached the building from the EAST, and that ladies in gentlemen, is a problem for the IRGC's narrative.

IMAGE 3
US warships are off the coast of Oman.

The red solid line depicts the alleged flight path due to the munition approaching from the east. If we believe this scenario, we believe that our military, on the opening day of the war, decided to take an unnecessary risk of the munition getting shot out of the sky and send it hundreds of miles over enemy terrain. The risk of the munition getting shot down would have increased dramatically. To put it plainly, that's stupid.

The yellow dotted line represents a real, and FAR MORE believable flight path that a Tomahawk would take to reach the target. It would stay over international waters to avoid detection.

For more evidence, check the thread.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@mr_mayank Nah, he’s just a dick.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@TheMaineWonk https://t.co/cJQQp7eQru

[Matt Tardio @angertab]

The Nail In The Coffin For Iran

Now it's confirmed, based on the direction of attack, there is a 0% chance the USA fired a Tomahawk Cruise Missile at the "school" that the IRGC claims killed 165 people.

IMAGE 1
Even using Bellingcat's research, this stands up. According to them, and verified by geolocation, the video in question was taken from the south/southwest of the targeted building from across the street.

IMAGE 2
This means that the munition in question captured on video approached the building from the EAST, and that ladies in gentlemen, is a problem for the IRGC's narrative.

IMAGE 3
US warships are off the coast of Oman.

The red solid line depicts the alleged flight path due to the munition approaching from the east. If we believe this scenario, we believe that our military, on the opening day of the war, decided to take an unnecessary risk of the munition getting shot out of the sky and send it hundreds of miles over enemy terrain. The risk of the munition getting shot down would have increased dramatically. To put it plainly, that's stupid.

The yellow dotted line represents a real, and FAR MORE believable flight path that a Tomahawk would take to reach the target. It would stay over international waters to avoid detection.

For more evidence, check the thread.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@mark_slapinski Show your undeniable truth.

I’m waiting.

Tick tock.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@LibertyBlitz You’re not deluded much are you.

[Leo @robert07059131]

@novalogz @em_Lazzy Evidence please… you’ve none.