@sama@sama About 2 months ago I wrote a longer comment on the chatgpt link about how the rules are too strict and how they could be much looser. Because this makes the program useless, whether it's free or paid. But the designers and creators have proven how important the
@sama@sama The photo is an example. The fact that there is chatgpt is that in front of my eyes, a friend of mine took an edited photo of a well-known and private person with chatgpt and made it so that his face could be recognized, bypassing ethics and data protection.
@sama@sama and if I were to make an edit with chatgpt. Whether it is a celebrity or a private person, chatgpt refuses to make the edit, citing ethical and personality rights, in order to make the faces 100% recognizable. Then how did you make the chatgpt the attached example photo of
@sama@sama chatgpt should be allowed more freely under its strict rules because it does not allow you to create identical original facial features of people you know personally or only a little. and there are still many rule errors that prevent you from taking the requested photo