Qual é a forma conjugada do verbo parecer na 3.ª pessoa do singular do presente do indicativo ou na 2.ª pessoa do singular do imperativo? https://t.co/9AjdBkvfWa
One of the few American journalists talking a lot about Brazil who actually knows and understands Brazil is @BenjaminFogel of Jacobin. The other day, he praised Janones and I tried to raise this issue with him and asked if he was bothered. by any of it. He stopped replying:
I am going to write something below that should be seen as the musings of one who celebrated – and still celebrates – Lula’s victory over Bolsonaro Jr. Here it goes:
I cannot for the life of me justify why o why Brazil’s courts had to demand of Bolsonaro that he hands over his passport the moment he lost the election. That he disputed the veracity of the election result is a sign of a faulty character, evidence that he is a bad loser. BUT, he had every right to being a bad loser; to dispute, rightly or wrongly, any result.
As for the argument that he was being investigated for other misdemeanours or crimes, that doesn’t wash either: What would have happened if Bolsonaro had won the election? Would the judges also prevent him from travelling abroad, as President-elect? I very much doubt that – which means that the judges were conflating executive and judicial powers.
To those who tell me that the Bolsonaro clan is a fascistic, criminal family, my reply is: You and I may very well think that. Alas, the judiciary has no right to use its powers to indict and to pursue someone because – or immediately after – they lost an election. It is shameful, to be precise. And it is also dangerous for those of us on the left who know what it means to be banned and hounded by rogue judges and police commissioners.
But I also have a message to Bolsonaro supporters, or those sitting on the fence, who assume that Lula is somehow behind the judges. He is not! This is the same court that imprisoned, falsely, Lula himself. What we have in Brazil is a judiciary that overreaches and habitually crosses the line that ought to separate judicial from political power.
It is such a shame that a judge took it upon himself to go after Bolsonaro on the eve of his defeat and, in doing so, to sully Lula’s stupendous victory.
One last point that my comrades in Brazil should note: If Bolsonaro and Rubio wanted to mount a campaign against Lula and Brazilian democracy they could never have been aided better than by that judge’s reckless writ.
@ABC Stop spreading the propaganda justifying Brazil's descent into tyranny. Lula-Moares are transparently persecuting @FlavioBolsonaro because he lost the election. The police went after his passport 7 minutes after the election results came in
https://t.co/QyuR5ih6kZ
Brazilian authorities and media are trying to find out where Flavio Bolsonaro is.
Brazil's notorious authoritarian Judge Alexandre de Moraes -- before the votes were counted -- already had an order prepared to seize Bolsonaro's passports and bar him from leaving the country even though **he's been charged with no crime** (there are various pending financial investigations). Moraes signed the order barring Bolsonaro from leaving Brazil SEVEN MINUTES after Lula was declared the winner on Sunday night.
A media outlet in Argentina this morning reported that Bolsonaro entered Argentina to fly to the US. His friends and allies deny this, but Flavio could easily just appear in Brazil or even by video and has not done so. Argentina is being sketchy, evasive and somewhat uncooperative with Brazil's federal police (Lula and Milei are obviously not allies).
Whatever else is true, it is not exactly a sign of a healthy, normal or functioning democracy when the candidate who narrowly loses a presidential race -- and concedes defeat -- is suddenly barred from leaving the country by a Supreme Court Judge now globally notorious for censoring, imprisoning and otherwise persecuting his critics and opponents of Lula's government. It is also worth noting that Bolsonaro's party dominates the Senate, having run on a vow to impeach Moraes, and this is seen by many as a kind of leverage/hostage ploy by Moraes to cling to power.
Lula cita o “túnel de Santos” como obra de seu governo
O túnel é obra tocada pela empreiteira portuguesa Mota-Engil, que Roberta Luchsinger diz ter sido favorecida em benefício de Lulinha
#DebateDaGlobo
@MeninRibeiro tem mais!
"Ministro de Lula afirma que Geraldo Alckmin teve uma atitude fascista no debate ao incriminar o PT no caso do dossiê"
https://t.co/PdGUmwZfKc
@DuquesaDetax Diva entende tudo de tributário, dá dicas de beleza e produtos para o lar. Nas horas vagas ela coloca " uns alecrins doirados" no seu lugar
Me diga quando será candidata e o meu voto é seu
😂😂😂