robin osullivan

🇺🇸❤️

[New York Post @nypost]

Judge was allegedly so drunk he couldn’t count backward or recite the alphabet after crashing into bus https://t.co/IDJyOvsF1e

[Joseph Hernandez @hernandezforny]

Most New Yorkers don’t know this: we’re sitting on part of the Marcellus Shale, one of the largest natural gas formations in the country. We could use it. Instead, we banned it.

So where does our gas come from? We buy it from our neighbor. Pennsylvania. The exact same shale, they drill it on their side of the line and pipe it right back over to us.

Does that make sense? Of course not.

The Marcellus doesn’t stop at the border. Pennsylvania drilled its half and became America’s #2 gas producer. 

The payoff: 123,000 jobs paying close to $100,000, more than $41 billion in economic activity, over $6 billion a year in tax revenue, plus $3 billion in impact fees to local communities since 2012. 

New York drilled nothing. We produce zero and import nearly everything we burn. And families pay for it: electricity 70% above the national average. 

Here’s the part they leave out: we can use this energy and protect our environment. The real risks, wastewater, methane, well integrity, are engineering problems 30-plus states manage every day. New York can set the toughest standards in the nation: zero-discharge wastewater, mandatory methane capture, hard setbacks from homes and watersheds, independent monitoring, full cleanup bonding.

We banned our half of the rock, then rented theirs.

It’s time to dig out the truth and bring common sense to Albany.

[Old Salty Marine @BamaSaltyMarine]

HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.

Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible]

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent]

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following.

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

AND MY FAVORITE:

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments!

The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though.

Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so but it’s worth a try.

How many people can YOU send this to?

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

2/5
New finding: the first fake voter ID — 1,253,115,467.79993 — is no longer mysterious. Run a linear regression on the first 735 records of the original source file. The line at position 736 predicts that number exactly. Zero difference. Five decimal places. Reproducible by anyone in Excel in under a minute.

[Blue Lives Matter @bluelivesmtr]

INFURIATING and HEARTBREAKING: This sweet little girl, Jocelyn Nungaray, 12, was r*ped, t-rtured her for hours and executed by illegal aliens from Venezuela.

Police say she fought for her life against the two grown men, biting and scratching one so badly that one still had visible marks at arrest.

Jocelyn Nungaray - say her name. REPOST this and wake people up. Her life mattered.

#thinblueline #Lawenforcement

[Art @ZarkFiles]

After finding double votes across clone groups, I had a follow-up question.
If there are X double-voting clone pairs in the 2021 snapshot, why does that number increase in 2022? And again in 2023? And again in 2025?

Elections don't change after they happen. A vote cast in 2016 is a vote cast in 2016. That record should be fixed.
But it isn't.

With every new snapshot, more clone records are showing votes assigned to them — including votes in elections that happened years earlier. Someone is going into the official voter history and writing in votes after the fact.

That raised a second question. If votes are being added to some clone records, are votes simultaneously being removed from others?

This image answers that.
382 people — real names, real dates of birth, real state ID numbers — had their double-vote records scrubbed from the database between snapshots. They showed up as having voted twice. Then that evidence disappeared from the official record.

At the same time, other clone records that previously showed no votes suddenly had votes written into their history.

These are not database errors. Someone looked at records showing that a person had voted twice under two different ID numbers and changed the official history so it no longer showed that. And someone looked at other clone records and added votes that were not there before.

The voter roll is supposed to be an immutable historical document. What we are seeing is active, ongoing rewriting of the official election record — after the elections are over.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

I can show you clone records where two different ID numbers both carry votes in the same election.
That satisfies most people.
It does not satisfy me.
Here is why.
The voter history field — the official record of who voted and when — is not reliable. I can demonstrate that in both directions.
Votes that happened are missing from the state record. In New York City alone, 254,713 votes present in county records do not appear in the corresponding state records for the same voter ID. The only official record under New York law is the state roll. Those votes are officially gone.
Votes that did not happen appear in the record anyway. Voters were canvassed who signed affidavits swearing they had not voted in a specific election. Their state records say they did.
So when I look at a clone pair and both records show a vote in 2020, I cannot tell you with certainty that two ballots were cast. And when only one record shows a vote, I cannot tell you the other one did not vote. That vote may simply be missing from the history.
Now here is where it gets worse.
Some people assume the ballot images, poll books, or chain of custody records could resolve this. They cannot. Not because they have been destroyed — though some have — but because they were never designed to answer this question. A ballot is intentionally anonymous. It cannot be traced back to a voter ID number. That is a foundational feature of the system, built in to protect voter privacy.
It means there is no document, no archive, no investigation that could ever conclusively prove which ID number cast which ballot. Not now. Not ever.
The only data point that ever existed to link the count of ballots cast to the count of people who cast them is the voter history — the check-in record. That is it. That is the entire reconciliation mechanism.
And in many jurisdictions, that reconciliation is never performed. The number of people checked in is never compared against the number of ballots counted.
That is stupid. I will use that word deliberately. It is stupid not to do that check. It is the only safeguard that connects a pile of anonymous ballots to the list of people who supposedly cast them. Failing to perform it does not just leave the door open to fraud. As far as I am concerned, it indicates someone wanted that door left open.
So what can I say with confidence?
The mechanism for double voting exists. 2 million records that should never have been created are or were in the database. Votes are being written into those records after elections close. Records showing double votes are being scrubbed between snapshots. And the only audit trail that could ever have caught it — the voter history — is demonstrably corrupted in both directions and in most places never reconciled against the ballot count at all.
If you left the bank door open, knowing anyone could walk in, take whatever they wanted, and walk out without leaving a trace — you would not trust the bank.
I do not trust this database.

[Fletch17 @RealFletch17]

Looking for a FEEL GOOD
Story? Well here it is!
Nurse helps bikers
Bikers bless her daughters
Lemonade stand
THIS IS AMERICA!

[Art @ZarkFiles]

HAVA was supposed to help Americans vote. The data suggests it helped Boards of Elections generate millions of illegal registrations instead. A thread. 🧵

[Art @ZarkFiles]

Voter rolls exist for one purpose: to connect qualified voters to ballots, and to prevent unqualified people from getting them. Every name in those rolls is a potential ballot.
The first steganographically-concealed algorithm I found — New York's "Spiral" — took two years to fully reverse-engineer. The complete step-by-step reconstruction is here:
https://t.co/Pkl4Wvri7G
Ask yourself: why does a public voter roll need an algorithm this sophisticated? What legitimate purpose does it serve?
I can't think of one.
Now look at Bexar County. Different mechanism, same target — ballots. Bypass the poll pad with 4,110 algorithmically generated records and you can get 4,110 genuine ballots. Not fake ballots. Genuine ones. Fraudulently obtained.
The Spiral gave someone control over names in a database designed to issue ballots. Bexar County shows what the next evolution looks like.

[Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸 @KarluskaP]

Yes @NassauExec Blakeman for New York!!!

[MaggieWise ⭐️⭐️⭐️ @maggiewise111]

Debbie Wasserman Schultz is officially out of Congress.

The Florida congressional map re-drawn under
Gov. DeSantis dissolved her current district and the new lines effectively end her house career, the same Wasserman Schultz, who,
as a DNC chair engineered
the 2016 primary rig against Bernie Sanders , just got rigged out by a fair map .
Karma has perfect timing.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

Things That Don't Belong Dep't:

Today I made two sideways threads that discussed 2 strange observations of the NY state voter rolls.
Finding 1: There are several long strings of consecutive ID numbers, where almost every record is an illegal clone. Many are interlaced, making detection more difficult.
https://t.co/kg2WQ3OUoQ
Finding 2: There are some extremely long strings of consecutive ID numbers (the longest is over 42,000 names) where every single record is purged and nearly 100% are dead. These IDs were assigned with the "Shingle" algorithm, unlike every other record in the database.
https://t.co/zJi4wwAl1R
Conclusion: It was known at the time the ID numbers were assigned that the first group of records were illegal and the second group weren't "qualified voters".

What does this mean? Records that can't be used to vote and that should be deleted, have been given special handling. I don't know why, but can say this is very unusual behavior within any professionally managed database.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

Here is a simple concept: how do you know how many people voted in an election if the voter rolls:
1) Contain cloned records, thus multiplying the number of ID numbers without multiplying the number of people
2) Erase votes from the voter history record in differing amounts, in every snapshot of the rolls, thus adding and subtracting from the original certified total
3) Contain duplicate vote entries in single voter records
4) Never, in any snapshot, reflect the same count of voters who voted as ballots certified as cast

It seems to me that those variables would make it impossible to know how many people voted in an election. The answer might be "close" (off by 5%-10%), that's enough of a problem to render the entire count invalid. If it were a bank, it would be closed by the feds as soon as the problem was discovered.
@Grok, please share your opinion of this.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

DOUBLE VOTES IN NY? YES.
I posted this earlier, but many skeptics of election fraud must have missed the post, so here it is again.

The first image shows what they look like in the database: multiple entries for the same election, with different voting methods (in red)

The second image shows how often this happened according to different snapshots of the database. Note that every snapshot is different. How does that happen? By assigning the duplicate votes to different people in the snapshots, even years after the election.

Questions for @Grok:
1) Is a face value reading of these voting history entries that these records double-voted, regardless whether it actually happened?
2) Do these entries represent a data integrity issue?
3) If so, how serious is it?
4) Does this on its own warrant an investigation?
5) Is this a problem even if it turns out that the records involved were not involved in double voting?
6) Is the voter history field trustworthy?
7) If not, how is it possible to know who voted, or how many people voted?

[Art @ZarkFiles]

A former NYPD detective looked at what I found hidden in New York's voter rolls and said one word:
"Plutonium."
The NY State Police Special Investigations Unit agreed.
Law enforcement and military intelligence both gave me the same instruction: publish fast.
This thread is why. 🧵

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

A Leader that has not faced multiple assassination attempts…President Bukele of El Salvador…

When he was elected, he kicked out Soros, the Cartels and impeached the Corrupt Judiciaries.

He reduced the Crime Rate by 97% and has the HIGHEST approval rating in the World of 85%…

[𝘿𝘾 𝙇𝙞𝙙𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙣𝙚 @DcLidstone]

Today feels like a good time to recirculate Joe M's "We Are The Plan".

Enjoy The Show!🍿

[QThestorm @17QStorm]

One of the fearless warriors who helped ignite The Great Awakening was Janet Ossebaard.

She was a true Pizzagate journalist and the creator of the legendary "Fall of the Cabal" documentary series. She exposed the global elite’s massive child trafficking networks and the satanic Cabal running it all.

🔗https://t.co/MDJ4NlVDA2

After publicly stating she would NEVER commit suicide… she was found dead just months later.

This is exactly why we fight.

If you want to understand the full scope of what’s really going on — how we got here and who’s responsible — watch her films. They will connect the dots like nothing else.