#VaccinesWork and do not cause #autism#GMOs are safe
#Earth is round
#Evolution is real
#ClimateChange is real
These have scientific consensus, which means they are held as truth by the scientific community. Those opposing them without sufficient evidence are #science deniers.
🚨 July subscriber perks available now! 🚨 Our Hero & Master tier subscribers have automatically been granted 5 NEW backdrops available on their character sheets!
Not subscribed yet? Get these perks, unlimited characters, and more—starting at just $2.99: https://t.co/3OPQVWsFiD
@nongmoreport There is nothing on that page that isn't either an outright lie or a misleading headline. "Possibly causes" and "Needs more investigation" does not equal "GMOs are bad!" #FactsNotFear
@Stf841 @AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited But since you're the expert who knows what's toxic and what's not, go ahead and let me know what's toxic in vaccines, and at what dosage it is dangerous to the human body, and what dosage is in vaccines. I'll wait.3/3
@Stf841 @AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited As far as toxicity, it is clear that you know nothing on the subject. Every single thing you place in your body is toxic at a high enough dosage, and non-toxic at a low enough dose. So yeah, call me stupid when you're the one arguing about something you have zero knowledge of.2/3
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited Ok, and you're the one between the two of us with common sense? You don't even understand the chemical properties of adjuvants, and when given an example you still can't even grasp it.
You've been fooled, and you're resistant to believing that you've been fooled.
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited I was comparing chemical makeup as an example. Method of intake doesn't matter as both end up in the bloodstream, or didn't you realize things you eat end up there?
Regardless, your comments reveal that you don't know what you're talking about.
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited@HighWireTalk Please speak in full sentences. I have no idea what you were trying to convey there, or which point you were saying "no" to, or how "old medical journals" is a valid argument or even a complete thought.
If you can't even communicate properly, how do you expect to win a debate?
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited You're not researching, you're finding misinformation that corroborates what you already believe, and that's dangerous.
Doing real research involves NOT dismissing things just because they don't line up with your current view. Good luck with that though, after being brainwashed.
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited you if you ingested them, but mixing them together makes sodium chloride which is in your food. The same thing happens when you mix aluminum with other gases, you get harmless salts. If you'd ever done an ounce of research you'd know that, but I'm the one "swallowing the crap"2/2
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited That is in no way true that unvaccinated people are more healthy than vaccinated ones. Where are you getting your information, @HighWireTalk ? LOL.
Vaccines have proven themselves effective, see: smallpox, polio, etc.
@Stf841 @SparklingOak@AmAust @gy0za13 @science_cited 1) It's not a belief. Belief takes faith, which is based on nothing. It's knowledge, which is based on facts.
2) What are you even asking and how does it relate to a vaccinated population vs a non-vaccinated one and the risks involved?