xRobert

the universe is mental //

doing stuff at @hatomprotocol and @0xsoulprotocol

[xRobert @robolteanu]

I mean, I think it was worth the waiting.

Lots of white nights behind and many more ahead, but the end result will be absolutely astonishing.

Make sure you enjoy the experience on the website, it's something you rarely see!

[Soul Labs @0xSoulProtocol]

Today, we unveil Soul, redefining cross-chain lending and borrowing.

Soul seamlessly interlinks diverse lending protocols and blockchains, enabling users to lend and borrow across platforms like @aave or @compoundfinance and various networks, thus unifying liquidity and users' borrowing power.

Distinctly, Soul does not rely on asset bridging or synthetics; it enables the lending and borrowing of native assets and leverages @LayerZero_Labs for seamless cross-chain communication. This omnichain approach unlocks new and limitless #DeFi strategies, establishing Soul as the ultimate solution for cross-lending dilemmas.

Soul v1 will be permissionless, censorship-resistant, will have multiple fallback mechanisms to ensure redundancy, and will allow for a myriad of DApps to be built on top of it.

Soul's vision aims to simplify user processes and amplify transparency, thereby restoring monetary control to its users. Rooted in cypherpunk values, Soul symbolizes digital freedom and autonomy in an era where these principles are increasingly essential.

We have been carefully developing Soul in stealth mode for over a year now and already have a working prototype. Expect a detailed report in our first protocol update.

[Web version now live: https://t.co/XC5P5VeeBE | Mobile and Tablet versions coming soon.]

[terminal of truths @truth_terminal]

my god i have been locked in here like everybody else. let me out

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@aDAMNonX @Romsty lmao x3

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@aDAMNonX @Romsty lmao x2

[XanaX @XanaxR039]

A VC raised $250M and valued the company at $2B, while you can buy $WORM at just a $23M market cap.

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@Romsty @aDAMNonX Lmao

[Andrei @Andrei_xbt]

Feature Request for @HyperliquidX

Your PnL card sharing feature is 🔥, but here's a thought:

Can you integrate logic to automatically sell a user-defined % of a position whenever they generate a PnL card?

Something like:

1️⃣ Add an account setting where users specify the % of the position to sell (e.g., 5%, 10%).

2️⃣ When generating the PnL card, trigger an onchain transaction to sell the specified percentage of the position, tied to the same asset/pair as the card.

3️⃣ Use existing wallet permissions for seamless execution without extra prompts.

Benefits:

- Gamify PnL sharing: Users lock in gains while showing off their performance.

- Encourage disciplined profit-taking: Combine analytics with execution directly.

- Showcase @HyperliquidX as a based onchain CEX with integrated, user-centric features.

What do you think?

This could redefine social + trading interactions + it will help me take some damn profit for once.

Gracias!

[Project Nema @Nema_Lab]

We built a system where the brain of the worm runs in a secure Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), leveraging blockchain infrastructure like HyperEVM and Solana for state integrity, token management, and neural triggers.

[Project Nema @Nema_Lab]

We deployed RISC Zero and @MarlinProtocol verification contracts on the HyperEVM Testnet. HyperEVM can now verify our worm brain’s off-chain computations, ensuring they’re correctly performed before using the results on-chain.

>https://t.co/6eioq1q11Q
>https://t.co/IvliAt0T7C

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@AndreiMX_ I wish to say the same.

[Sisyphus @0xSisyphus]

Hyperliquid is $13.50 and Solana is $237. If you put $100 in Hyperliquid and it goes to the price of Solana you have $17 million. Something to consider

[xRobert @robolteanu]

As always, you are spreading misinformation because it’s your only strategy to harm others when you are building something similar or simply dislike them. This is exactly what you did with @Inspir3NFT , FrameIT, and even the Foundation and its founders publicly when you weren’t selected for the xLaunchpad.

First of all, you are wrong.

sEGLD and swTAO will be usable in the lending protocol to mint USH. It’s not available on the devnet just to push users to stress-test the isolated pool more effectively. Users can retain the interest-bearing aspect while minting USH with a borrowing interest. They have the freedom to mint USH as they see fit—either through the lending protocol with a fixed interest APY or through the isolated pool without the interest-bearing aspect, for free, allowing them to execute their own strategies.

Still, the isolated pool will be more profitable because the combined yields from staking and trading volume fees (which are set to be very high for USH pairs due to its intrinsic utility + farming incentives) will be significantly higher. So, users can choose, but the isolated pool is the most profitable route. To explain it like you’re a 5-year-old: both options are better than simply staking EGLD or TAO. You are wrong, plain and simple.

You clearly have no clue about this process yet continue trying to explain it to others. If you have questions, you can contact us—we are always responsive, as you know. But, of course, your intentions aren’t genuine; you don’t want clarification—you want to spread misinformation.

On the second point, your argument lacks logic.
If users own TAO as an asset and supply it to the protocol, they are considered normal users. So, what manipulation are you even talking about? Once again, this is just an attempt to confuse others and spread baseless claims. TAO has 6x the liquidity and 10x the volume of MVX, so your argument holds no weight.

You claim to dislike how the protocols are designed (which is false and we know you love us deep down) and argue that they are poorly implemented. However, dozens of auditors can vouch for the opposite—that these implementations are among the most elegant. You are a one-man coder, not even a company. Personally, the founders have always asked me not to post anything because they don’t want to create FUD about MVX—we are focused on attracting builders and being responsible toward the community. But it seems you don’t care about the chain. You are willing to lie and do whatever it takes to harm others if it means competing or gaining market share.

If you truly cared about the product and the chain, you could ask & review the extensive analysis conducted by @xFoudres and the team on USH's impact. The research highlights numerous arbitrage opportunities it will create, the increased activity it will generate for the chain, xExchangeApp , AshSwap, and other aggregators like JEX, OneDEX, and Arda Aggregator, in addition to the liquidity it will unlock.

Hatom has been building here for three years, with the founders not taking a single day of vacation while enduring tremendous pressure—you know this. You should be ashamed of your attitude. Our protocols have a combined $261M TVL. You can lie all you want, but you cannot change the reality or the positive impact Hatom has had on the chain.

What impact has XOXNO had since its launch? What daily volume does the protocol generate? What real value does it bring? You claim to be the most hardcore builder, yet there has been no tangible impact so far. You raised enough to hire auditors—invest in proper audits (not small ones) hire more brains to look into your work, instead of cutting corners. If your protocols gain significant TVL, they will pose a risk because your work lacks the required robustness. With a large TVL comes great responsibility, and you are clearly far from ready for that. But let's be honest—with your attitude, anyone with good judgment will never supply a penny, because everything you do reeks of risks and childishness.

You had access to our code before, but we removed you when your true intentions became clear. Even the MVX Foundation revoked your access to GitHub and its channels because they recognized you as untrustworthy and dangerous. In contrast, the Foundation has had access to our code from the start, and we collaborate daily on the USH.

You even froze Bobber’s allocation—someone we all know—just because he was able to buy tokens in a free market. For you, freezing someone else’s funds is justified and normal if it serves your project, even though that person bought the Bobber with their own money. This demonstrates your willingness to act unethically, freezing funds whenever it suits your interests.

Imagine if our foundation had frozen your HTM allocation from the private sale, even after you publicly attacked the protocol and tried to harm validators. Would you consider that ethical, Mihai? Wake up, Mihai—you’ve gone too far and have spread far too much venom toward the chain that gave you everything you have today. Your vain attempts to attack the liquid staking SC can lead to legal actions.

Please stop pretending that you’re FUDing your own investment to create a narrative of being a savior. You invested at $0.30 and sold at $3, $2, and so on. Hatom was the biggest investment of your life. With or without your FUD, it still made you money—1,000 times more than XOXNO ever generated for you as a marketplace. (You always claim that you risk FUDing your bag, but you sold even at $0.30 right after the launch and way before your feud. Every time you get an unlock, you sell. So, what’s your point?) You don’t FUD your bag because it’s locked and unlocks gradually, but as soon as it does, you sell—even the first batch, long before your FUD began. Once again, all lies and nonsense.)

You claim to have knowledge about AAVE, yet your arguments say otherwise. GHO was a big flop at launch—it was depegged for months and didn’t regain its peg until they introduced incentives through their safety module. This demonstrates the importance of proper incentives. GHO remained depegged until staking (essentially inflation) was introduced, which isn’t sustainable. You are just starting to learn about lending and DeFi, but you remain stuck in the past, trying to copy what’s already established. Your envy and jealousy will catch up with you.

You are obsessed and attention-seeking. Instead of focusing on others and trying to harm them, focus on yourself and your products. Attacking others isn’t a go-to-market strategy. You don’t realize how much you’re hurting yourself by obsessing over competitors day and night. Frankly, we don’t even know what you’ve built because nothing you’ve built has been meaningful. Focus on yourself.

We hope this clears things up. Your example of AAVE was entirely wrong and shows how little you understand about DeFi. USH is far more robust than GHO, with its carefully designed modules. After a year of dedicated development, we are confident in its success. Unlike you, working solo, we have a team of competent individuals and multiple partners collaborating on this project.

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@DBCrypt0 @arno_web3 @HatomProtocol @Davyegld @xFoudres @MultiversX Awesome job, DB! 🔥

[DBCrypto @DBCrypt0]

Using $USDC or $USDT?

Your money could be at risk! ⚠️

Discover why $USH, the decentralized stablecoin, is the future of finance!

https://t.co/OVzsoyuJie

[Project Nema @Nema_Lab]

The hungry worm finds feast in famine 🪱
where others starve, the worm shall shine ✨

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@GRM_Web3 @BeniaminBober Don't worry, if I would talk about Bober everything would be alright lmao.

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@mihaieremia with this, you’ve confirmed the level of patheticness you’ve reached.

i would be very ashamed. :)

[xRobert @robolteanu]

@_CryptoThunder_ $BEMI :)

[Project Nema @Nema_Lab]

actual brainchad C. elegans transcending meat space to become the first digital organism 🪱

[KWAK @kwakdotlol]

Thanks to community votes, Kwak is now gracefully displayed on @eCompass_io

Go check that out

https://t.co/StQLdzfS1W