@DBCrypt0 In fact, I believe this post was written with AI and compared to DB once I used to read, you can feel the difference.
It's cold, mechanic and has almost no personality, feels like other 1000 posts that have pretty much the same vibe.
Not judging or something, just a thought.
@CStreza@vaken_crypto@0xSoulProtocol I'm very serious. What's wrong with this?
On top of this you had a protocol update shared on our X profile.
What else do you think should be shared?
I mean, we have offered a public update here:
https://t.co/9fO8IXxmZZ
Also, we've been answering all questions in the Telegram group all day long.
You can join here if you wish: https://t.co/ocxb89Gl3h
You've got all the info we could share for now, you just need to look through our profile.
cc: @joewu_official
@vaken_crypto@0xSoulProtocol This is not related to the fact that you asked for more news when in fact we have shared more news.
It's a different topic and would be worth to phrase it differently if you would like to hint about this.
Ah man, please stop tagging me in biased three pages of content. Skimmed through it, hopeyl you're proud promoting a flawed protocol that you call "transparent".
1. You don't use only a liquidation dashboard for a production ready protocol. You set bots in order to move quick and liquidate position in order to keep the protocol secure.
It's outrageous to have a founder of a lending protocol liquidating positions at 4am. He was probably the only one able to liquidate because of xEGLD depeg (which you need to work on the liquidity depth before adding it in a lending protocol) which made liquidations unprofitable.
Not only you couldn't automatically liquidate positions, but on top of that it wasn't even profitable anymore due to the depeg on top of the flash crash.
It seems that yes, the protocol worked exactly as intended - to put users at risk.
Wow, Mihai paid suppliers himself (pray decentralization) with borrowed funds from his own protocol, what a boss move. This was done after I've raised the issue, please stop with this socialization BS from Euler, you're not even close to that level.
If you would have proper system in place, you wouldn't lose 2.5% of users supply during a flash crash.
And then you come to say that we mimick Xoxno? Lmao, at this point you are absolutely cringe.
Hatom handled hundreds of millions in supply and demand for our thousands of users which never encountered an issue, so let's stop with this BS.
Prove your tech and not words. Next crush your LP could be gone and your token will go to 0 due to the innovative design of your Bober Lend.
Don't worry, you can check the Hatom Dashboars to see Supplied and Availability in the market and you can realize if there's bad debt 😉.
We repaid automatically, from protocol revenues during the crash, because our protocol was able to work properly and generate revenue. Thing I can't say about Bober Lend.
Now, dig deeper without biased lenses, pretty sick of disgusting character you have.
Please don't tag me again unless you come with proper arguments and stop wasting my time with this.
Thanks and have a good day!