Rohit Girbal

15th Aug 🎂 | Leo ♌️ | Art Director 👨‍🎨 | Passionate Photographer 📸 | पुणेकर 🇮🇳 | Hardcore Gamer 🎮 | MBA 👔💼 | GT 650 🏍

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@HelleLyngSvends

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@IndEditorsGuild

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@PuneCityPolice Some miscreants are bursting crackers since 2.30am on a public road in Kharadi, Gulmohar Orchids, Rakshak Nagar Road. Please look into this.

We are also facing loud Bullet silencer folks purposely making ear-deafening sounds over past few days.

[Piyush Goyal @PiyushGoyal]

Zero Check Karlo Bhai! 😂

#MLCElectionResults #BallotPaper

[Narendra Modi @narendramodi]

MLC elections in 28 seats across 4 big states - Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar and Karnataka.

Elections held using ballot papers.

Guess how many seats Congress won? 🧐

[S.Jayashankar @jaypanicker]

Spare us the lecture on “regime change is normal in a democracy.”

You know exactly what the phrase means when Prashant Bhushan and AISA’s Neha Bora use it while invoking Bangladesh’s Gen Z street movement that toppled a government outside the electoral calendar. That is not “oppose, expose and depose through elections.” That is a deliberate attempt to normalise extra-constitutional pressure, street veto and manufactured unrest.

If it is only about elections, why the hurry? Why the Bangladesh template? Why frame protests against the Election Commission as a “fight for regime change”?In a real democracy, governments change when voters decide at the ballot box, not when a handful of activists and opposition leaders decide the system is “dictatorial” the moment they keep losing. You yourself have used the phrase in purely electoral contexts before. The difference is context, and this context reeks of anarchy-shopping.

The BJP is not “apoplectic with feigned rage.” We are simply refusing to pretend that “regime change” + Bangladesh reference = routine parliamentary opposition. India is not Bangladesh. Our institutions, our voters and our Constitution will decide the next government in 2029, not street theatrics dressed up as high principle.

Do your job in Parliament and on the campaign trail. Stop trying to import instability and then gaslight the country about dictionary definitions.

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@dhruv_rathee @narendramodi

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@CJP_for_India

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@UNHumanRights

[The Jaipur Dialogues @JaipurDialogues]

First Footage of Dhruv Rathee Detention is Out

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@elonmusk Mr. POTUS Elon Musk, we don't need your validation on what is best for our country. We have strong leadership in place, and they know what is right for us.

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@SauravDassss @Cockroachisback

[BJP @BJP4India]

भाई-बहन दोनों मिलकर बदतमीज़ी और मारपीट की दुकान चला रहे हैं!

प्रियंका गांधी ने महिला पुलिस कर्मी पर कोहनी से हमला कर ये साबित कर दिया कि महिला सम्मान की बात करना कांग्रेस के लिए सिर्फ दिखावा है। सत्ता की राजनीति से लेकर सड़क पर मारपीट ही कांग्रेस का असली चेहरा है।

स्कैम और लूट करने वाले अब सीधे-सीधे गुंडई और मारपीट पर उतर आए हैं… 😳

[BALA @erbmjha]

The most iconic pic from today 😂

[BJP @BJP4India]

Rahul Gandhi can keep pushing his usual misinformation. 😂

But now, there’s a website doing the opposite: breaking down his claims, one by one, WITH FACTS.

It’s called “Jhooth Ki Goonj” — and honestly, the name says it all. 😎

His propaganda may echo. The facts hit harder.

𝐆𝐨, 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐧 ➡️ https://t.co/Has7IfA42Z

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

Hello @kritisanon,

1. Don't play the woman card. You were not criticized for your gender, but for your choice of clothes in an ad. You are bringing gender into this to make it a women's issue and seek wider support from women and male feminists. It's not a gender issue. Even Ranveer Singh was criticized on Twitter for a nude photoshoot. He didn't play the gender card.

2. Personal choice stops where public commercialization begins. What you wear off-camera is entirely your prerogative. You've been in this business for years. Until now, nobody bothered you about your choice of clothes. You know why? Because nobody actually cares what you wear. The outrage here comes from a commercial choice: sexualizing a deeply sacred festival celebrated by millions. Context dictates appropriateness. If a male actor appeared bare-chested while portraying the brother in that exact scene, the public pushback would be identical. The issue is sacredness and context, not gender.

3. Claiming "clothes don't define culture" directly contradicts human history. Attire is a foundational visual language of every global tradition, you cannot wear a Kimono and call it Indian ethnic wear, nor can you strip a festival of its sacred aesthetic without altering its significance. If attire truly has zero bearing on cultural respect, then tomorrow is Eid. Can you wear that exact same outfit you wore in that ad and wish Eid Mubarak? You said clothes don't define the respect you have for culture in your heart. So do it and we'll take our criticism back.

Respecting a tradition means honoring its context, not commodifying it under the guise of fashion.

[Aditya Raj Kaul @AdityaRajKaul]

Why is the Global Media completely silent on civilian protests across Pakistan Occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) and killings by Pakistan Military? International live coverage on protests in democratic India but complete mute spectator to Army ruled Pakistan’s atrocities in PoJK.

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

https://t.co/7RZZWVVpZc

[Rohit Girbal @rohit1591]

@dhruv_rathee