@WheatWatcher@stationmum101 No ban, it’s a product that seems to do what it’s supposed to, safely from what I can see, like many other tools we use in Ag. Whether it’s necessary is debatable, but if other methane reducing alternatives mean smaller herd numbers or new taxes… Ag loses.
@Gazzagunna Depends whether you consider a “day” as a rotation or a time based event.
The time it takes to orbit the sun isn’t changing nearly as much. 0.03% over the last 4.5 billion years.
I have enough on my plate without worrying about errant dwarf planets 😜
@drianwright I guess what you’d have to ask yourself is would you be happier if it were tomatoes or potatoes utilising whatever the final amount of water is that govt allocates. I suspect some just don’t want development of any kind, cotton being a convenient target.
@EuanRitchie1@noisywomanMP@katew5000@tanya_plibersek No, that’s not true Euan…cotton can be grown purely as a dryland crop with some very successful examples already in the NT…of course anyone granted access to water would want to use it to increase yield and reliability.
@JaneCaro I’m not sure what you’re getting at, farmers are allocated resources solely by govt departments. We must assume those various depts take on board the environment, and that allocated water to farmers is then meant to be used productively. It’s not a farmers call.
@vacy_vacy@SensibleJoel23@CentreMehi It’s quite likely that you are, albeit in as a small percentage. Australian cotton is used in blends with other cotton to improve the overall quality of the thread…
There are some 100% Australian cotton products to support too, a quick internet search is all you need 👍🏻
@SustainableDanG@Kate_McBride_1@MarkOgge@nswirrigators@NSWCSE@whereisdaz Science actually doesn’t say “don’t do this”.
Science provided a guide, it’s up to decision makers to weigh up the pros and cons of implementing those recommendations in part or in full.
Irrigators are bound by their licence conditions, they are doing nothing wrong.