Who am I?
41yo guy from 🇸🇪
3 kids 👦🏼👦🏼👧🏼
Loves the ocean 🌊
Politics: Right ➡️
Firmly believes in 🇮🇱 right to defend it self against Islamic terror 🏴☠️
Enjoys: Vacations in 🇮🇹
Good wine and food 🍷
Does anybody seriously believe that Mojtaba Khamenei is still alive when the monster does not even show up for his tyrant father's pathetic funeral? These are the guys who massacred 37,000 of Iran's own youth in January, folks! https://t.co/TWvc2Wgail
Som tur är så är inte Göran, 60-talister på Facebook och vänsteraktivister facit för vad gemene svensk känner för USA. Jag var en av 60000 plus som upplevde Luke Combs på Ullevi häromdagen. Aldrig har jag sett så många cowboyhattar och boots i vårt avlånga land.
Grattis USA till era första 250 år. Må ni ha många 250 års-firande framför er 🇺🇸
On August 9, 2001, the Sbarro pizzeria in Jerusalem was busy with families and children eating pizza on a summer afternoon. A Hamas suicide bomber entered with a guitar case and detonated a device packed with nails.
The blast killed 15 people, including 7 children and a pregnant woman, and injured 130. Witnesses reported children thrown through windows onto the blood-covered street and a mother discovering her baby dead in a stroller.
Hamas had chosen this crowded civilian restaurant to maximize deaths among innocent Jews, especially children. They still honor the bomber as a hero.
This is the evil of Hamas. It didn't start on Oct 7.
@11ghosteleven@Mish_K_ And also. Jesus was a Jew himself. It had nothing to do with race or what not. It had to do with what he preached and said. This very much happens everyday still.
This is my favorite argument.
In Hiroshima, roughly 140k people died due to the nuclear bomb out of 350k. That’s 40% of the city.
In Nagasaki, 80k people died out of 263k. That’s 30% of the city.
In Gaza, 73k people have died (according to GHM) out of 2.3 million. That’s about 3% of the population. A substantial percentage of that are terrorists.
So Israel has dropped an amount of bombs on Gaza that exceeds the power of the nuclear bombs we dropped on Japan and yet the death toll is far lower both proportionally and on a raw numbers basis.
How is that possible if Israel is committing genocide? Maybe it’s because they’re not.
There wasn't a single Israeli on Lebanese soil when Hezbollah started bombing Israeli cities on Oct 8. The only reason the IDF entered Lebanon is to stop this unprovoked aggression. Hezbollah is not resisting occupation, it's an annihilationist aggressor serving a foreign empire.
The text you are referring to contains partially accurate quotes and facts but is strongly biased. It portrays the war as a premeditated Israeli expansion project driven by revenge from 1948, while downplaying Arab actions. The reality was an escalation in which both sides contributed, with Israel launching a preemptive strike amid an acute security crisis.
Accurate or partially accurate parts
• Quotes about the 1948 borders: Moshe Dayan said in 1949 that Israel’s border should be at the Jordan River and that the current lines were “ridiculous.” Yigal Allon expressed frustration over not having “completed the task” in 1948–49. There were expansionist currents in parts of the leadership and military. Israel viewed the 1949 armistice lines as temporary, not permanent borders.
• Abba Eban: He described the 1967/1969 lines as reminiscent of “Auschwitz” — a rhetorical image for the narrow, vulnerable borders (only 9 miles wide at their narrowest). The quote is authentic but was used to highlight vulnerability, not as evidence of genocidal intent.
• Soviet disinformation: The Soviet Union sent a false intelligence report to Nasser in May 1967 claiming Israeli troop concentrations against Syria (to support their ally). This contributed to Nasser’s mobilization.
• Post-war statements: Menachem Begin (1982): “We decided to attack him.” Yitzhak Rabin, Ezer Weizman and others later said that Nasser did not necessarily plan an immediate attack and that the Egyptian forces were insufficient for a full-scale offensive. Israel chose to strike first. This is correct and is often used to nuance the “no choice” narrative.
What the text distorts or omits
• Arab escalation in 1967: Nasser mobilized tens of thousands of troops in Sinai, expelled UN forces (UNEF), closed the Straits of Tiran (a recognized casus belli for Israel since 1956), signed defense pacts with Jordan and Syria, and allowed rhetoric about “throwing the Jews into the sea” to escalate. Syria supported guerrillas and shelled Israeli villages. Jordan attacked on 5 June. This created a siege-like situation with existential risks given Israel’s narrow territory.
• Israel’s decision: It was a preemptive strike (Operation Focus) to avoid absorbing the first blow. Both the IDF and U.S. intelligence assessed that Israel could win quickly. Leaders like Levi Eshkol wanted to avoid war but saw no alternative as the threat grew. Preemption had been an established part of Israeli doctrine since the 1950s: seize the initiative in order to survive.
• Expansion vs. security: Some officers had revanchist plans, and victory led to occupation and later settlements. But the war did not break out primarily to “complete 1948.” It was a response to an acute crisis driven by Arab mobilization, Palestinian terrorism, water disputes, and the Cold War. Israel later offered land for peace (e.g. Sinai to Egypt in 1979).
• “No existential threat”: The later statements often refer to Nasser not having immediate offensive plans, not that the threat was fabricated. The siege, blockade, and emerging coalition created a strategic threat to a small state with no strategic depth. Most serious historians view it as preemptive self-defense in a hostile environment.
Summary – why the war broke out
A spiral of border clashes, Syrian support for militants, Soviet disinformation, Nasser’s excessive mobilization and blockade led Israel to strike first on 5 June 1967. Israel won decisively and occupied territories, which changed the region. The Arab states lost and initially refused negotiations (Khartoum Resolution: “three no’s”).
The text is propaganda that emphasizes one narrative side. For balance, read Michael Oren’s Six Days of War or primary Israeli/American documents. History is not black-and-white — Israel had expansionist elements, but 1967 was primarily a defensive-preemptive response to real threats.
Lorena Delgado Varas har spridit grov antisemitism och konspirationsteorier.
Jamal El-Haj har deltagit i en konferens med kopplingar till en terrororganisation.
Trots detta får de mysa i SVT:s Politikbyrån – utan kritiska frågor och utan att deras agerande problematiseras.
När extremism, antisemitism och kopplingar till antidemokratiska miljöer inte längre väcker reaktioner flyttas gränserna för vad som anses acceptabelt i svensk politik. Så normaliseras hatet - av public service.
Irans nya ledare lovar att utplåna Israel inom 15 år.
Det är bra de är tydliga med vad "free palestine" betyder.
Så när Hezbollah angriper Israel från Libanon är det ett existentiellt krig där Israel är i sin fulla rätt att använda hela sin arsenal precis hur de önskar.
Blir det för tuffa tag kan Hezbollah alltid ge upp, det är ju så krig funkar. https://t.co/2tR41vRQqG
Well the tariffs are there to make Americans buy American goods. If you can buy something from china really cheap, most people do. But if tariffs are there, the difference in price will not be that big, so now the customer might choose American made instead. Tariffs = money stays in America. Jobs are created.
I’m not a phd. But I still get it.
@svt Jag är förbannad! Er undfallenhet mot antisemisterna och oviljan till opartisk och objektiv nyhetsrapportering är häpnadsväckande och upprörande. Rapporten från Hamas massaker och sexuella våld borde ha fått eget program med fokus på Hamas grymheter. Skäms!