Ronald Taraborrelli

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

After tonight, it’s even clearer that the Senate should take the SAVE America Act and continue debating it until it passes

Repost if you agree

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

Today my Committee heard testimony from @JamesOKeefeIII on something every American should be furious about: petition circulators paying homeless individuals cash, and even offering drugs, in exchange for voter registrations and signatures. Names and addresses of real registered voters were forged.

This isn't a hypothetical. It's happening right now and it has to change.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

Most Democrats couldn't make it to our hearing on government fraud. The empty chairs made their priorities pretty clear.
Hard to claim you're fighting waste when you don't even show up.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

December 2025: Jack Smith swore under oath that he didn't spy on text messages belonging to members of Congress.

Today: New evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included.

This is a blatant abuse of power, and exactly what our Founders warned about.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

Share if you agree that the Senate shouldn’t take its August recess until it has passed the SAVE America Act.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

I have spent my career fighting waste, fraud, and abuse in Washington, and this Wednesday's HSGAC hearing takes on two of the most urgent examples.

@nickshirleyy will testify on how loopholes allow non-citizens to fraudulently collect taxpayer-funded welfare benefits, straining public resources and rewarding those who should not qualify.

@JamesOKeefeIII will detail his undercover investigative work, revealing how weak enforcement has allowed illegal aliens and ineligible individuals to register to vote.

Both point to the same conclusion: stronger oversight is not optional. It is overdue.

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

“If you’re representing the people of Philadelphia, the only flag that should be raised over City Hall is the American flag.” 👏

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST IN: The RNC has just SUED New Jersey's Democrat Secretary of State after it was exposed they let people vote who have *NEVER LIVED IN THE STATE*

WTF?! How many states allow this? 🤯

"[NJ allows] non-residents who have never lived in New Jersey to register and vote in the state's elections."

This kind of fraud is EXACTLY why President Trump is demanding the SAVE America Act. Elections MUST BE SECURE

How many "blue" states would become purple if the fraud was gone? Get SAVE DONE! 🇺🇸

[Dawn Fantasia @DawnFantasia_NJ]

‼️PART ONE of TWO: On today's episode of "New Jersey's latest harebrained scheme to waste your tax dollars trying to circumvent the Constitution", A4077 attempts to thwart a federal immigration facility contractor via financial penalty because @GovSherrillNJ & Trenton Democrats don't like federal immigration law.

Congress (and Democrat President Bill Clinton) settled this nearly 30 years ago. Whether you agree with it or not is irrelevant to the NJ legislation at hand. Immigration detention is a FEDERAL function authorized by FEDERAL law, and states DO NOT have the authority to obstruct the FEDERAL government- OR ITS CONTRACTORS- from carrying out FEDERAL directives.

NJ already tried to block these contracts and lost in federal court. So now the "strategy" shifts; if we can't ban it, we'll just tax it into oblivion. Cute, but still a violation of federal law.

This bill imposes an 8% fee on detention contracts, adds a 3% corporate surtax, and then- get this-funnels part of that money into a fund for legal services connected to detention & deportation.

Yes. NJ is attempting to tax a federally-authorized program, and then plans to swing those funds to finance legal opposition to that same federally-authorized program. And you, the taxpayer, are forced to bankroll ANOTHER constitutional fight NJ has already lost once before under @GovMurphy.

Who benefits from this exercise in futility? Their lawyer friends, that's who. #dirtyjersey

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@ewarren The amount on US citizens that wants this past is overwhelming. The question is why do you go against the will of the people. Is it because you are an elite thinking we are small and uneducated and you know all.

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@SenRickScott Get it done!!!

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@SenSanders When you let millions of people in the country and provide free housing, free benefits you throw the entire economic system off. That is exactly what happened and why we don’t have affordable housing and have high inflation.

[Dawn Fantasia @DawnFantasia_NJ]

I don't believe for one second that most New Jerseyans truly believe the ideology that's driving this movement.

This bill is being sold as a healthcare bill. It's NOT. It's a shield bill that wraps legal protections around providers, institutions, insurers & organizations engaged in what it calls "reproductive health care activity." It limits licensing consequences, restricts cooperation with out-of-state investigations & throws up barriers to accountability.

Even the bill language changed, replacing the politically- unpopular terminology "gender transitioning" of minors with the much broader phrase "reproductive health care activity." Buried in the definitions remains language covering medications & medical procedures intended to support providers of gender transition, REGARDLESS OF AGE. The bill DOES NOT distinguish between adults and children. It repeatedly states "person."

WHY??? New Jersey law has always treated children differently. We prohibit minors from drinking alcohol, using tobacco/vapes, getting tattoos, restrict body piercings, gambling, or even using tanning beds because we recognize something very basic: children/adolescents are still developing physically, emotionally & neurologically.

Our laws already recognize that PERMANENCE MATTERS. We restrict tanning because of concerns about permanent skin damage. We regulate tattoos and body piercings because of concerns about permanent markings & permanent disfigurement. Every single day, NJ law acknowledges that minors DO NOT possess the mature judgment necessary to make decisions with lifelong consequences.

Yet somehow we are supposed to believe that this principle suddenly disappears when the discussion turns to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, abortions, and medical pathways that permanently affect fertility, sexual function, healthy body tissue, and other irreversible aspects of a child's future??? Children experiencing gender dysphoria deserve compassion, mental health support & medical oversight. Compassion does not require throwing basic common sense out the window.

Also, NJ allows minors to terminate pregnancies without parental consent, with no gestational limit, by people who are not even licensed physicians. If something goes wrong, this bill now protects the "PROVIDER" and not the child or their parents?

So here's a question for all of the "advocates": if these interventions are as well established as supporters claim, why are we building legal shields around the people performing them?

NJ should not be in the business of insulating providers from consequences before protecting children. I cannot support legislation that makes accountability harder while the medical, ethical, and legal questions surrounding these interventions remain the subject of active debate across the entire globe.

The consequences of this vote will not be carried by us. They may be carried by NJ children for the rest of their lives.

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

Defund the police.
Say yes to open borders.
No human is illegal.
People should not own guns.
There is a genocide against transwomen of color.
Women can have penises.
Do not procreate to protect Mother Earth.
Islam is peaceful.
Indigenous Knowledge > "white" science
Black Lives Matter
COVID does not spread at BLM rallies.
There is no objective truth. All is relative.
Zionism is Nazism.
Free Free Palestine.
Israel is a Nazi state.

Each of the latter positions and countless others (fully decoupled from reality) are espoused by one side of the political aisle.

Think carefully about whom to vote for.

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@RandPaul Get it done!!

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@DashDobrofsky This is just like Biden. Let’s hope the truth doesn’t come out and if it does, we’ll just replace him with who we want and not the people.

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@BernieSanders Repeal the ACA. That would be a start. Do not allow Pharma Health Insurance companies or the Health Insurance industry to make political campaign contributions or form PACs.

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@overton_news He should remain in the race and will most likely win. It will show the rest of the country how insane the democratic voter has become.

[Ronald Taraborrelli @RonTarabor]

@ewarren Because it’s simple math. If you make 50 K a year you barely pay income tax if at all. You make 10 million a yr you may pay 3.5 million in taxes. But you know this and just want to gaslight the people.

[Proudofus.uk @ProudofusUK]

🇬🇧 THEY TOLD YOU A STORY. 🇬🇧

Colonisers. Slavers. Oppressors. And you were supposed to feel ashamed.

Not for what you done... But for WHO YOU ARE. 🇬🇧

So we tested it. Britain wrote everything down, so we opened the books. 📖

Turns out fewer than 1 man in 10 could vote in the year Britain banned the slave trade. No woman could. Your ancestors could hang for stealing a sheep, get shipped across the world for petty theft, or go down a mine at 8 years old. In Manchester, the average age of death in a labouring family was 17.

They weren't running the slave trade. They were underneath it too.

Which is what makes what happened next worth knowing.

In 1772 an enslaved man named James Somerset walked free from an English court, because English law couldn't hold a slave.

In 1791, 300,000 families just stopped buying slave sugar. No march, no riot, just a decision made at 300,000 kitchen tables.

In 1792, 519 petitions carrying 390,000 names hit Parliament, most signed by people who couldn't vote themselves.

In 1807, Britain banned the trade.

Then the slave owners sent Britain a bill for the 800,000 people they still held. 💷 £20 million. About 40% of the entire government budget at the time.

The Treasury says it wasn't paid off until 2015. So if your family paid British tax before then, they helped buy 800,000 people their freedom.

From 1808 the Royal Navy spent 60 years hunting slave ships at sea: 1,600 stopped, 150,000 people freed, and 1,600 British sailors dead, mostly of disease, buried thousands of miles from home. ⚓

In 1816 they ended two centuries of Barbary corsairs enslaving Europeans.

In 1896 a war that lasted 38 minutes ended slavery in Zanzibar. 🇹🇿

Almost every country on Earth outlaws slavery today.

That fight was paid for largely at British expense, by British hands.🇬🇧

So why haven't you heard any of this?

Because within living memory, someone rewrote the story. You got taught the crime. Not the cure.

The powerful exploited the world. They exploited their own people first. It was those people who ended slavery. 🇬🇧

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

History got rewritten once, in living memory, by no one who was ever named or held to account.

We are ordinary people doing what ordinary people have always done. Opening the books. Refusing to look away.

This is how we fight back. Fact by fact. Story by story. Name by name.

We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it.

If you can afford to support what we do: https://t.co/rih7iKwnvf

Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧