Olivia
Online
Dziewczynka
@roolercos
Joined April 2016
507 Following
22 Followers
955 Posts
@vanawki @goddsofmischief ben durin kullanıyorum mavuika yerinede birşey farketmez c6 Iansan yada c6 chevruse olmadığı sürece bu çar bence alınmaz ya elektrik dpsim yok diye aldım geziyorum sadece vurduğunu hiç hissetmiyorum bile
@Delulululullya @patosipek Mendel bezelyelerle bu kadar iddialı deneyler yapmadı, genetik ve evrim teorisi bir tweet ile yeniden yazılmış :D
@askaassiii @platcornweb @qrizmo12 Ortada apaçık bir iftira ve Türk antipatisi varken 'hit peşindeler' demek komple teslimiyetçiliktir. Adamlar resmi biletlerde Atatürk'e 'soykırımcı' yaftası vuruyor, sen hala 'oyunda var ya' diye zırvalıyorsun. Tarihi yazanları, tarihi bilmeyen cahillere yedirtmeyiz
@mitsukiyadate https://t.co/h98uXMWyfh discord diyince aklıma şu taze olay geldi
@HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This thread is about what appears to be a serious case of anti-Turkish discrimination and nationality-based double standards in a Hearts of Iron IV community associated with Paradox.
A Turkish player was directly banned from the Discord while using Mustafa Kemal Atatürk — the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye — as his profile picture. He was not first politely asked to change it. The Atatürk avatar itself became the basis of the dispute.
When he challenged the ban and asked why Atatürk was supposedly unacceptable, moderators did not simply point to a neutral rule. Instead, Atatürk was described as a “controversial” figure and connected to the Armenian events of 1915, with extraordinarily serious accusations being directed at the founder of the Turkish Republic.
Turkish users then tried to defend Atatürk, challenge those historical accusations and ask why Turkish national identity was being treated differently. According to what we experienced, our responses were removed or hidden, users who objected were banned from the Discord, and the Discord was subsequently closed to new joins, preventing excluded users from returning and responding to the accusations made against them.
We then took the issue to the public Hearts of Iron IV Steam forum. There too, users complained that rebuttals were being removed or suppressed instead of being answered.
https://t.co/ipLKzEYeoy
This is no longer simply about one moderation decision.
It is about whether Turkish players, Turkish historical identity and the founder of the Turkish Republic are being subjected to a different standard from everyone else.
1/ Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is not a hate symbol.
He is the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye and the central statesman associated with the creation of the modern Turkish Republic.
An ordinary photograph of Atatürk does not inherently express hatred against Armenians, advocate violence, glorify atrocities or attack another nationality.
If a moderator wants to turn “Turkish player with an Atatürk avatar” into grounds for exclusion, the burden should be on that moderator to explain exactly what neutral rule was violated.
2/ The historical accusation being made against Atatürk is especially serious because the basic chronology does not support portraying him as the political authority directing Ottoman Armenian policy in 1915.
In 1915 Mustafa Kemal was not the Ottoman head of government, Interior Minister or the political leader controlling the central government.
He was an Ottoman military officer and commanded the 19th Division during the Gallipoli campaign. He became President of the Turkish Republic only in 1923.
Whatever position someone takes on the Armenian events, simply transferring responsibility from the Ottoman political leadership of 1915 onto Mustafa Kemal requires evidence.
3/ That distinction should not be controversial.
If @chakerathe or another moderator specifically claims that Atatürk personally organized or directed the Armenian events, then provide evidence concerning Atatürk himself.
Do not substitute:
“he was Turkish”
or
“he later became the leader of Turkey”
for evidence of responsibility for decisions made by a different political leadership in 1915.
Otherwise, Turkish users are effectively being told that their republic's founder carries collective guilt simply because he was an Ottoman officer and later became Turkey's leader.
That is precisely why this begins to look like nationality-based prejudice rather than neutral historical moderation.
4/ It is equally misleading to casually group Atatürk together with the belligerent dictators of World War II.
He was President when Hearts of Iron IV begins in 1936, but he died on 10 November 1938, before World War II began in September 1939.
He did not lead Turkey during World War II.
So treating Atatürk as though he were simply another WWII dictator requiring the same symbolic restrictions badly distorts the actual historical context.
5/ And this is a Hearts of Iron IV community.
National leaders, political ideologies and twentieth-century history are literally the subject matter of the game.
Atatürk is not some unrelated extremist symbol that Turkish users imported into a completely apolitical community.
He is one of the most important historical figures connected to the Turkey represented in the game.
That makes the decision to single out his ordinary portrait even more difficult to justify.
6/ The Armenian-events argument does not solve this problem.
I do not accept the legal characterization of the 1915 events that these moderators are attempting to impose as beyond legitimate disagreement.
Others are free to disagree with me.
But disagreement over historical or legal characterization does not establish that an Atatürk portrait is hateful imagery, nor does it establish that a Turkish user displaying Atatürk hates Armenians.
Those are separate propositions.
7/ More importantly, political recognition by governments or parliaments is not identical to a universally binding international judicial determination settling every aspect of a historical controversy for every person in every country.
The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide through both prohibited acts and the required intent to destroy a protected group in whole or in part. It does not itself constitute a judicial judgment on the events of 1915.
And the European Court of Human Rights in Perinçek v. Switzerland expressly did not decide the historical/legal classification of the 1915 events when deciding the Article 10 case.
So moderators cannot simply say “the legal question has universally been settled; therefore disagreement equals hate speech.”
8/ None of that means Discord has to host every opinion.
Discord's current rules prohibit denial of historical mass atrocities. That is Discord's private platform policy.
But Discord's same hateful-conduct policy also protects people against hatred and discrimination based on national origin, and its definition of hate imagery focuses on symbols used to promote hatred, threats, discrimination or violence.
That distinction matters enormously here.
An ordinary Atatürk portrait is not automatically transformed into hateful imagery simply because a moderator strongly disagrees with a Turkish user's interpretation of history.
9/ And this is where the anti-Turkish discrimination concern becomes impossible to ignore.
If historical figures and national symbols associated with other countries are tolerated, yet the founder of the Turkish Republic is uniquely treated as inherently offensive, then Turkish players are plainly entitled to ask:
Why are Turkish historical symbols being held to a different standard?
If Turkish users are punished for displaying a mainstream Turkish national figure while equivalent expressions of other national identities are tolerated, that is the textbook appearance of selective treatment based on nationality.
10/ Discord itself defines national origin as a protected characteristic and prohibits discrimination and prejudice based on protected characteristics.
Paradox's own published forum rules likewise prohibit expressions that are racially offensive or “in any way discriminatory,” including ethnic slurs and hate speech.
So this cannot be dismissed with:
“Turks are offended, who cares?”
If Turkish nationality is being singled out for worse treatment, that is exactly the sort of discrimination these rules claim to oppose.
11/ The moderation process afterwards makes the situation even more concerning.
We challenged the accusations.
We attempted to provide historical and legal counterarguments.
Instead of those arguments simply being answered, users involved in the objection were banned and messages were removed or hidden.
Then access to the Discord was closed to new joins, meaning those already excluded could not simply return and defend themselves against what was being said about them.
If that closure was genuinely an unrelated anti-raid or security measure, say so and provide the timeline.
Otherwise, the sequence creates the very strong appearance of moderators controlling who was allowed to participate in the argument after banning the side challenging them.
12/ Then we moved the issue to Steam.
Why?
Because if moderators are confident that their decision was fair, they should have no problem with their reasoning being publicly examined.
Yet the complaint continued: messages challenging the moderation and defending the Turkish position were removed, restricted or suppressed instead of substantively answered.
If our argument is wrong, refute it.
Deleting an argument is not a refutation.
Banning the person asking the question is not evidence.
Closing the room after removing one side does not make the remaining side correct.
13/ And no, “this is a private server; we can ban whoever we want” does not answer the accusation of discriminatory moderation.
Yes, private communities have moderation powers.
Paradox's own rules reserve broad authority to delete posts and punish users.
But the existence of that power does not establish that every use of it is fair.
A moderator can possess the power to ban someone while still applying a rule selectively or discriminatorily.
Those are completely different questions.
14/ The issue therefore is not:
“Do moderators have a ban button?”
Of course they do.
The issue is:
Was a Turkish user banned under a standard that would have been applied in the same way to a comparable user from another nationality?
Was Atatürk targeted because of an objective, consistently applied rule?
Or was a central Turkish national figure treated as inherently illegitimate in a way equivalent foreign national figures are not?
That is the question Paradox needs to answer.
15/ Calling this concern “racism” or “anti-Turkish discrimination” is not about claiming that Turkish people constitute a biological race.
The relevant issue is discrimination and hostility based on national origin and ethnic/national identity — categories explicitly recognized in Discord's own hateful-conduct framework.
When Turkish identity, Turkish historical figures or Turkish users are singled out for adverse treatment because they are Turkish, that is a nationality-based discrimination concern regardless of the semantic label someone prefers.
16/ A Turkish person using Atatürk as an avatar does not imply hostility toward Armenians.
It does not imply support for atrocities.
It does not imply racial or ethnic supremacy.
For millions of Turkish citizens, Atatürk represents the creation of their modern republic.
Automatically interpreting that symbol through the most hostile possible lens while refusing equivalent respect to Turkish historical identity is precisely the kind of treatment that makes Turkish players feel unwelcome in an allegedly international community.
17/ Nor should Turkish users be required to renounce their own interpretation of a historical controversy simply to prove that they are worthy of participating in a gaming community.
There is an enormous difference between attacking Armenian people and disagreeing over legal or historical interpretation.
A fair moderation system should be capable of distinguishing:
a historical argument
from
hatred toward an ethnic group.
If it cannot, then Turkish users are being subjected to an ideological loyalty test rather than a neutral anti-hate policy.
18/ We therefore ask @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio and @chakerathe to answer directly:
What exact written rule made an ordinary Atatürk avatar bannable?
Was the user banned specifically because the picture was Atatürk?
What evidence supports the allegation personally connecting Atatürk to the crimes moderators attributed to him?
Are equivalent historical figures from other national communities subjected to the same standard?
Why were rebuttals removed or hidden?
Why were users challenging the decision banned?
Why was the Discord subsequently closed to new joins?
And who reviews a moderator accused of applying rules discriminatorily?
19/ This is especially important for a company running an international historical game.
Turkish players are not second-class members of the HOI4 community.
We are not guests who must hide the founder of our own republic while other players freely display their national history.
We buy the game.
We support the game.
We participate in the same communities.
We deserve exactly the same treatment as everyone else.
20/ @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This is why we are publicly raising the issue.
If the Atatürk ban was justified, show the rule and show the evidence.
If Atatürk was accused of personal responsibility for the Armenian events, substantiate that accusation.
If posts were removed for legitimate moderation reasons, explain which rules they violated.
If the Discord was closed for unrelated security reasons, document that.
But do not subject Turkish players to a different standard, remove their ability to respond, and then dismiss their complaint.
No anti-Turkish double standards.
No nationality-based discrimination.
No collective guilt.
Same rules. Same evidence. Same standards. Same respect
https://t.co/h98uXMW0pJ
@HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This thread is about what appears to be a serious case of anti-Turkish discrimination and nationality-based double standards in a Hearts of Iron IV community associated with Paradox.
A Turkish player was directly banned from the Discord while using Mustafa Kemal Atatürk — the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye — as his profile picture. He was not first politely asked to change it. The Atatürk avatar itself became the basis of the dispute.
When he challenged the ban and asked why Atatürk was supposedly unacceptable, moderators did not simply point to a neutral rule. Instead, Atatürk was described as a “controversial” figure and connected to the Armenian events of 1915, with extraordinarily serious accusations being directed at the founder of the Turkish Republic.
Turkish users then tried to defend Atatürk, challenge those historical accusations and ask why Turkish national identity was being treated differently. According to what we experienced, our responses were removed or hidden, users who objected were banned from the Discord, and the Discord was subsequently closed to new joins, preventing excluded users from returning and responding to the accusations made against them.
We then took the issue to the public Hearts of Iron IV Steam forum. There too, users complained that rebuttals were being removed or suppressed instead of being answered.
https://t.co/ipLKzEYeoy
This is no longer simply about one moderation decision.
It is about whether Turkish players, Turkish historical identity and the founder of the Turkish Republic are being subjected to a different standard from everyone else.
1/ Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is not a hate symbol.
He is the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye and the central statesman associated with the creation of the modern Turkish Republic.
An ordinary photograph of Atatürk does not inherently express hatred against Armenians, advocate violence, glorify atrocities or attack another nationality.
If a moderator wants to turn “Turkish player with an Atatürk avatar” into grounds for exclusion, the burden should be on that moderator to explain exactly what neutral rule was violated.
2/ The historical accusation being made against Atatürk is especially serious because the basic chronology does not support portraying him as the political authority directing Ottoman Armenian policy in 1915.
In 1915 Mustafa Kemal was not the Ottoman head of government, Interior Minister or the political leader controlling the central government.
He was an Ottoman military officer and commanded the 19th Division during the Gallipoli campaign. He became President of the Turkish Republic only in 1923.
Whatever position someone takes on the Armenian events, simply transferring responsibility from the Ottoman political leadership of 1915 onto Mustafa Kemal requires evidence.
3/ That distinction should not be controversial.
If @chakerathe or another moderator specifically claims that Atatürk personally organized or directed the Armenian events, then provide evidence concerning Atatürk himself.
Do not substitute:
“he was Turkish”
or
“he later became the leader of Turkey”
for evidence of responsibility for decisions made by a different political leadership in 1915.
Otherwise, Turkish users are effectively being told that their republic's founder carries collective guilt simply because he was an Ottoman officer and later became Turkey's leader.
That is precisely why this begins to look like nationality-based prejudice rather than neutral historical moderation.
4/ It is equally misleading to casually group Atatürk together with the belligerent dictators of World War II.
He was President when Hearts of Iron IV begins in 1936, but he died on 10 November 1938, before World War II began in September 1939.
He did not lead Turkey during World War II.
So treating Atatürk as though he were simply another WWII dictator requiring the same symbolic restrictions badly distorts the actual historical context.
5/ And this is a Hearts of Iron IV community.
National leaders, political ideologies and twentieth-century history are literally the subject matter of the game.
Atatürk is not some unrelated extremist symbol that Turkish users imported into a completely apolitical community.
He is one of the most important historical figures connected to the Turkey represented in the game.
That makes the decision to single out his ordinary portrait even more difficult to justify.
6/ The Armenian-events argument does not solve this problem.
I do not accept the legal characterization of the 1915 events that these moderators are attempting to impose as beyond legitimate disagreement.
Others are free to disagree with me.
But disagreement over historical or legal characterization does not establish that an Atatürk portrait is hateful imagery, nor does it establish that a Turkish user displaying Atatürk hates Armenians.
Those are separate propositions.
7/ More importantly, political recognition by governments or parliaments is not identical to a universally binding international judicial determination settling every aspect of a historical controversy for every person in every country.
The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide through both prohibited acts and the required intent to destroy a protected group in whole or in part. It does not itself constitute a judicial judgment on the events of 1915.
And the European Court of Human Rights in Perinçek v. Switzerland expressly did not decide the historical/legal classification of the 1915 events when deciding the Article 10 case.
So moderators cannot simply say “the legal question has universally been settled; therefore disagreement equals hate speech.”
8/ None of that means Discord has to host every opinion.
Discord's current rules prohibit denial of historical mass atrocities. That is Discord's private platform policy.
But Discord's same hateful-conduct policy also protects people against hatred and discrimination based on national origin, and its definition of hate imagery focuses on symbols used to promote hatred, threats, discrimination or violence.
That distinction matters enormously here.
An ordinary Atatürk portrait is not automatically transformed into hateful imagery simply because a moderator strongly disagrees with a Turkish user's interpretation of history.
9/ And this is where the anti-Turkish discrimination concern becomes impossible to ignore.
If historical figures and national symbols associated with other countries are tolerated, yet the founder of the Turkish Republic is uniquely treated as inherently offensive, then Turkish players are plainly entitled to ask:
Why are Turkish historical symbols being held to a different standard?
If Turkish users are punished for displaying a mainstream Turkish national figure while equivalent expressions of other national identities are tolerated, that is the textbook appearance of selective treatment based on nationality.
10/ Discord itself defines national origin as a protected characteristic and prohibits discrimination and prejudice based on protected characteristics.
Paradox's own published forum rules likewise prohibit expressions that are racially offensive or “in any way discriminatory,” including ethnic slurs and hate speech.
So this cannot be dismissed with:
“Turks are offended, who cares?”
If Turkish nationality is being singled out for worse treatment, that is exactly the sort of discrimination these rules claim to oppose.
11/ The moderation process afterwards makes the situation even more concerning.
We challenged the accusations.
We attempted to provide historical and legal counterarguments.
Instead of those arguments simply being answered, users involved in the objection were banned and messages were removed or hidden.
Then access to the Discord was closed to new joins, meaning those already excluded could not simply return and defend themselves against what was being said about them.
If that closure was genuinely an unrelated anti-raid or security measure, say so and provide the timeline.
Otherwise, the sequence creates the very strong appearance of moderators controlling who was allowed to participate in the argument after banning the side challenging them.
12/ Then we moved the issue to Steam.
Why?
Because if moderators are confident that their decision was fair, they should have no problem with their reasoning being publicly examined.
Yet the complaint continued: messages challenging the moderation and defending the Turkish position were removed, restricted or suppressed instead of substantively answered.
If our argument is wrong, refute it.
Deleting an argument is not a refutation.
Banning the person asking the question is not evidence.
Closing the room after removing one side does not make the remaining side correct.
13/ And no, “this is a private server; we can ban whoever we want” does not answer the accusation of discriminatory moderation.
Yes, private communities have moderation powers.
Paradox's own rules reserve broad authority to delete posts and punish users.
But the existence of that power does not establish that every use of it is fair.
A moderator can possess the power to ban someone while still applying a rule selectively or discriminatorily.
Those are completely different questions.
14/ The issue therefore is not:
“Do moderators have a ban button?”
Of course they do.
The issue is:
Was a Turkish user banned under a standard that would have been applied in the same way to a comparable user from another nationality?
Was Atatürk targeted because of an objective, consistently applied rule?
Or was a central Turkish national figure treated as inherently illegitimate in a way equivalent foreign national figures are not?
That is the question Paradox needs to answer.
15/ Calling this concern “racism” or “anti-Turkish discrimination” is not about claiming that Turkish people constitute a biological race.
The relevant issue is discrimination and hostility based on national origin and ethnic/national identity — categories explicitly recognized in Discord's own hateful-conduct framework.
When Turkish identity, Turkish historical figures or Turkish users are singled out for adverse treatment because they are Turkish, that is a nationality-based discrimination concern regardless of the semantic label someone prefers.
16/ A Turkish person using Atatürk as an avatar does not imply hostility toward Armenians.
It does not imply support for atrocities.
It does not imply racial or ethnic supremacy.
For millions of Turkish citizens, Atatürk represents the creation of their modern republic.
Automatically interpreting that symbol through the most hostile possible lens while refusing equivalent respect to Turkish historical identity is precisely the kind of treatment that makes Turkish players feel unwelcome in an allegedly international community.
17/ Nor should Turkish users be required to renounce their own interpretation of a historical controversy simply to prove that they are worthy of participating in a gaming community.
There is an enormous difference between attacking Armenian people and disagreeing over legal or historical interpretation.
A fair moderation system should be capable of distinguishing:
a historical argument
from
hatred toward an ethnic group.
If it cannot, then Turkish users are being subjected to an ideological loyalty test rather than a neutral anti-hate policy.
18/ We therefore ask @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio and @chakerathe to answer directly:
What exact written rule made an ordinary Atatürk avatar bannable?
Was the user banned specifically because the picture was Atatürk?
What evidence supports the allegation personally connecting Atatürk to the crimes moderators attributed to him?
Are equivalent historical figures from other national communities subjected to the same standard?
Why were rebuttals removed or hidden?
Why were users challenging the decision banned?
Why was the Discord subsequently closed to new joins?
And who reviews a moderator accused of applying rules discriminatorily?
19/ This is especially important for a company running an international historical game.
Turkish players are not second-class members of the HOI4 community.
We are not guests who must hide the founder of our own republic while other players freely display their national history.
We buy the game.
We support the game.
We participate in the same communities.
We deserve exactly the same treatment as everyone else.
20/ @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This is why we are publicly raising the issue.
If the Atatürk ban was justified, show the rule and show the evidence.
If Atatürk was accused of personal responsibility for the Armenian events, substantiate that accusation.
If posts were removed for legitimate moderation reasons, explain which rules they violated.
If the Discord was closed for unrelated security reasons, document that.
But do not subject Turkish players to a different standard, remove their ability to respond, and then dismiss their complaint.
No anti-Turkish double standards.
No nationality-based discrimination.
No collective guilt.
Same rules. Same evidence. Same standards. Same respect
16 yıllık bir masalın sonu. Türk Anime TV (2010 - 2026) resmî olarak veda ediyor. #SayonaraTurkAnime https://t.co/kZtWwC5xay
@Sezai74262643 @hazakavvam Dışa kapalı her sistem bozulmaz, popülasyon genetiğinin kendi kuralları var. 100 bin kişi rastgele evlendiği sürece genetik havuz gayet sağlıklı kalır. Entropi yasasını biyolojiye yanlış bükmüşsün. Keşke tweet atmadan önce biraz makale okusaydın
@aminosiklik @Xinustune3nokta Putların kendisinin allahları olduğu kolpasını size kim sıktı knk yahudilermi
@asilzadeahmet1 @MeteHan47397772 @harikasecil @sismanemreazye Biz düzgün adamlarız dedikten iki cümle sonra "ne bok yerseniz yiyin" seviyesine inen o muazzam nezaketin gözlerimi yaşarttı. Kusura bakma ama senin o "düzgün adam" kriterlerin, Endonezya vizesinden daha hızlı patlamış. Bu üslupla Kaf Dağı'nı ancak rüyanda görürsün
@asilzadeahmet1 @MeteHan47397772 @harikasecil @sismanemreazye Yabancı kadınlar evden kaçmıyor, kocasına baskı yapmıyor" diye tarih kitabı arayan vizyoner kardeşim; aradığın şey eş değil, garanti belgesi olan ev aleti sanırım. Kendi fikri olan kadına "engelli" diyecek kadar medeniysen, sana itaat edecek bir robot üretilmesini bekle sen bence
@CemMarmara Gençlerin ahlak bilmemesini modernizm diye kutsayıp, medeni dünyada kavga yok derken bile insanlara nefret kusman muazzam bir bilişsel çelişki. Kendi zihnindeki o kibirli aydınlanma masalında sana iyi uykular; zira gerçek dünya senin bu sığ sloganlarından çok daha karmaşık baybay
@nehiristeoff @dengeplus Bir dahakine fikirlerini savunurken Türkçe kelimeler kullanmayı da dene belki daha etkili olur
@nehiristeoff @dengeplus Anladık tamam en kürt sensin en kendini masum vatansız hisseden yine sensin
@ExtraSweetMocha @hyouinkyouma @OttomanArchive Biraz fazla abartmadın mı? Türk kimliği, baskın kültür ve devlet potasında eriyen asil bir sentezdir, senin sandığın gibi köksüz bir bulamaç değil. Soyunu ve demografisini koruma refleksine 'Irkçı' diyemezsin o noktada dur; git o çok sevdiğin kozmopolit dünyanda karış
@metiiniinan @EditorGA @Kemalistilkay Felsefe kasarken iki dakikada mahalle kavgası moduna dönmen harika bir ampirik veri oldu. Argümanın bitince entelektüel masken düşmüş, ağzından köpükler saçıyorsun. Hakaretlerin acını dindirmez; sakinleş ve bu ülkenin tek resmi dili olan Türkçe ile ağlamaya devam et
@metiiniinan @EditorGA @Kemalistilkay Sözlükten bulduğun 'ampirik, anakronik, kadrini bilmek' gibi kelimeleri arka arkaya dizince entelektüel olmuyorsun, sadece basit bir gerçeği süslüyorsun. Bu coğrafyanın sosyolojisi ne kadar çok katmanlıysa, bu devletin dili ve hukuku da o kadar nettir
@metiiniinan @EditorGA @Kemalistilkay Kavramların kadrinden bahsederken, kendi dar ideolojini antropoloji diye yutturmaya çalışman tam bir komedi. Slogan atan biz değiliz; kelime oyunlarıyla gerçekleri eğip bükmeye çalışan sensin. Bu toprakların tek ampirik ve kalıcı gerçeği Türkçedir bay bay
@metiiniinan @EditorGA @Kemalistilkay Felsefe terimleriyle süsleyince illegal hayalleriniz meşru olmuyor. Yüzyıllardır bu topraklardaki tek hakikat ve kalıcı güç Türkçedir; sizinki sadece geçici bir sosyal medya gürültüsü
@CoNNRoaD @Gokhaanyrt puhahahaha ironik olan tek şey bu tweeti atarken beyninin harcadığı oksijene yazık olması. Temel oksijen molekülü serbest radikal değildir git biraz reaktif oksijen türleri çalış. Seni yavaş yavaş öldüren oksijen değil, bu kimya cehaleti :)
@tradermahsum @AybasOzgur Kürtleri PKK ile eşitlemek ne büyük bir cehalet Yarın serbest bırakılacak PKK mensuplarıyla aynı toplumda yaşayacaksınız; buna rağmen milyonlarca Kürdü örgütle özdeşleştiriyorsunuz. Örgüt başka, halk başka. Biraz olsun bu ayrımı öğren bari
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers