@munawer15641@divya_000007 The evidence proved it is a highly established, mainstream position in Islamic jurisprudence. If you want to follow a softer opinion, thatโs between you and Allah, but donโt pretend the strict position doesn't have massive scholarly weight behind it.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Okay, let's do this instead. Name the major, mainstream Islamic councils or classical schools of thought that agree with your view that hand-drawing stylized human characters with full facial features is completely permissible.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Prominent contemporary scholars (such as Ibn Baz, Ibn โUthaymeen, and the Permanent Committee for Fatwa) have explicitly ruled that drawing cartoons, manga, or anime falls directly under the prohibition of hand-drawn images. They are not 'exempt' just because they are stylized.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Great classical commentators like Imam Al-Nawawi explicitly stated in his commentary on Sahih Muslim that making an image of an animal or human is strictly prohibited and counts as a major sin.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 The hadith prohibits taswir of animate beings not just "real" ones with souls. It applies to any complete depiction of living forms, real or imaginary, because the sin is in imitating Allah's creation of life, not whether the image has an actual soul
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Contemporary Islamic scholars distinguish photography from traditional image-making, they view it as capturing Allah's creation via light rather than hand-crafting souls or competing with divine creation, though stricter opinions still deem animate photos forbidden.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Anime characters like Zoro are still depictions of living forms with souls. The prohibition is on the act of taswir, not just realism or idolatry.
@munawer15641@divya_000007 Drawing characters and creatures will result in the artist getting tormented by his creations in hell according to sahih muslim 2110. Merely reading Manga is fine unless it contains shirk, which a lot of them do.
@temurovss@gimoxtweets Muslims never went to the moon, didn't invent the telephone, cellphone, internet, this social media platform, or computers. Al-Khwarizmi could only prosper under the Abbasid caliphate back when Islam was less close minded and he benefitted greatly from non-Muslim knowledge.
@IFirdousFB@AguNna516@Warlock_mohit The Christians also stole all of the Jewish prophets. And the jews themselves sourced their stories from a bunch of pagan faiths (epic of gilgamesh, etc). And the quran affirms both the
Bible and the Torah.
@IFirdousFB@AguNna516@Warlock_mohit The Quran affirms what he said, but that doesn't make him a muslim. None of the prophets preceding Muhammad said the shahada. And none of them uttered the words islam or Muslim.
@Networthcoin@AguNna516@Warlock_mohit 124000 conveniently unknown prophets according to the hadith with the 25 other ones named in the quran originating from other religious books which precede the quran. Muslims wouldn't be able to name adam if judaism and Christianity hadn't existed.
@IFirdousFB@AguNna516@Warlock_mohit Jesus declared himself king of the jews, that's the reason why he was crucified. He certainly never proclaimed himself to be Muslim.