Looking at the much broader picture of the Russell Brand story, imagine if it’s being used to further an agenda. Could this be possible? 🤔
I’m not saying he’s not guilty - I’m just looking at it from an extra angle.
Think about it…
How is this extremely high-profile case going to affect young men? Most are too scared to approach a woman or get into a relationship for fear of doing something wrong anyway. That fear has probably been exacerbated by the revelations from this case.
Step back a little further and I think we’re looking at yet another link to the depopulation agenda. The more men fearing relationships leads to less sex, less breeding and a lowered population.
There are many branches to the tree of the depopulation agenda. Is this another one?
Some peoples attitude to rape, especially historical rape, is really triggering 😢
Some of us know what it was like 20+ years ago when even the notion of reporting it was so traumatic, let alone going through with it doing so.
And let’s be honest, not much has changed has it?
@BethanyCherisse I love this argument so much because it’s hilariously easy to prove wrong. Ready? Okay!
If the jury just used the women’s words only as evidence then he would have been found guilty on all counts, but in reality he wasn’t.
@MObfuscated I don’t believe for a second that the other assaults were false. They just weren’t beyond reasonable doubt. So he was found not guilty. See? It’s hard to prove these things. HTH.
@MObfuscated There was contemporaneous evidence. It was presented. No man who hasn’t raped someone need fear anything. It’s frighteningly difficult to get a rape conviction. Brand didn’t have to prove his innocence. They had to prove him guilty and they did.
@MObfuscated Okay. Here goes. He is guilty. He was found guilty by a jury of 12 people, unanimously. Eight were male. One has to imagine that having been given instruction by the judge, and heard the testimony, and seen the evidence, they all believe they’ve made the right decision.
@devils_refugee@Helen_Fields There were people who testified that she told them about the rape at the time. There is medical evidence. There are text messages. Feels like though to me. Clearly not to you but hey. I think you’ve made your position clear…
I wonder what this guy thinks happens if people call the police to report housebreaking or being mugged or car theft. Are they believed? Well there you go then Mike.
Whatever we think (and I think we all agree about rape) - I do think it's wrong of Sir Mark Rowley - or any other policeman to appeal for more people/victims/survivors/witnesses to come forward with additional accusations, saying "YOU WILL BE BELIEVED". If they believe every accuser as a default position (literally promised beforehand) , they are throwing away the whole process of establishing a just conclusion. Maybe "You will be taken seriously" or "You will be treated with respect" would be a better message.