@ContrarianCurse Does it make sense? Or do you take the TSM approach vs Intel (never compete with customers) and just go all-in on leading flexible compute?
@SouthernValue95 Would be curious if you let Claude look for other data points with stronger historical correlations are there other variables you can add to the analysis.
@easyfinanceguy @SleepwellCap Ah! But being a high % of card transactions is VERY different than being a high % of total transactions. V/MA work best with universal merchant acceptance. In India ~2-3% of merchants accepted cards when UPI was launched. In Kazakhstan similarly a LSD% of transactions were cards.
@easyfinanceguy @SleepwellCap Is that true? My impression was there was very low merchant adoption (and therefore low consumer adoption) in both countries. Could be wrong. I would not be excited to own a business reliant on interchange at the moment. But the network (V/MA) economics seem very reasonable to me
@easyfinanceguy @SleepwellCap A govt can impose the network domestically when there arenโt widely adopted commercial options. There are few examples. While govt options can be dominant domestically, they lose intl acceptance to V/MA. And as a whole govt alternatives lose share to V/MA domestically over time.
@GavinSBaker@modestproposal1 The chart/data you should look at depends on what youโre analyzing. Consumers โfeelโ the charts showing higher DQs (they donโt know the bank has charged off their credit card balance). Banks โfeelโ the charts showing lower DQs (e.g. they charged off a portion of the card balance)
@retaox But! The owners of the business growing 3% have only sustained their purchasing power (0% growth) and the owners of the business growing 8% have increased their purchasing power by 5%.