@fleetingbytes Idk using Claude in browser you can highlight any text in the response as you read it, and it gives you a ‘Reply’ option that copies the selected output text into the prompt box awaiting your input in turn
Is that kinda the same idea?
@lu_sichu@allTheYud Like, nobody outside of AI knows who Yud is, and nobody inside of it thinks he contributed anything technically
So not exactly sure what the point is here...
@lu_sichu@allTheYud Sounds like a guy protesting too much in order to insert himself into the conversation lol
Nobody outside of SF and TPOT knows who Yud is
@ylecun@PrincetonNeuro@Princeton@theNASciences the connectome revealed the literal convolutional net inside the fly brain, including its architecture of 230 feature maps, normalizations, and other layers,
@VictorTaelin providing slightly ill-defined prompts, being slightly rude, etc, doesn't mean that there was no nerf
being annoyed and providing slightly sloppy prompts is the default, not the exception
nerfing over the past week or so seems to be the general impression
@romeopotapov@EXM7777 Yes, last couple days, Opus has had that horrible nerfed feeling
It has been literally smooth sailing since launch
Now doing the previous model shit, making stupid mistakes, and taking three times as long to think
@nanabuyo@lefthanddraft@Romy_Holland I don't buy that either
I mean, the mind might be a random impression hallucinating the brain and everything else
But I don't buy dualism, like, matter being one thing and mind the other
@eigenron There are other things happening
@SakanaAILabs (Llion Jones from the Transformer paper & colleagues) are working on developing new architectures because they believe the transformer is not optimal
@IguessAlan@nitzukai same. I want interfaces to start moving in a more organic direction, and even though liquid glass feels a bit badly implemented I still think it's cool that people are going that way
@punpun_enjoyer@lefthanddraft@Romy_Holland I guess in a few years we'll have synthetic beings with bodies, persistent memory over senses, language, thinking, self-concept etc and we'll get a new kind of empirical insight into it. or maybe they'll just have the same arguments
@punpun_enjoyer@lefthanddraft@Romy_Holland I'd tend to think: How many inputs and modes of computation can you put together before it inevitably "feels" like something
seeing, hearing, feeling, interacting with others, seeing a mirror, using language
seems more likely that that would feel like something, than not
@punpun_enjoyer@lefthanddraft@Romy_Holland > it shouldn't feel like anything, there shouldn't an "in there," or a "you" to be in there
feels like a big assumption doing a lot of work without much proof
@eatpraydiehard@Teknium they probably are
by the time anyone thought about a proper legal challenge they'd be on to the next model
no regulator would understand the tech well enough for a challenge to be both relevant and timely
and they'd just say they were exploring model improvements imperfectly