Robert Pramston

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@TheBritishIntel The British are too weak and demoralized to survive in a dangerous world. Decades of indoctrination, invasion, and self-loathing have broken a once great people. They’ll shuffle quietly into that good night, apologizing for imaginary ‘isms’ and ‘phobias’ every step of the way.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@NickCohen4 @_seangriffiths You post this as if Panorama was a reliable non biased source. That is absurd.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@NickCohen4 ‘Russian Intelligence’ is just a supposition - and one that makes little sense. It hasn’t been properly investigated, and there’s zero interest in actually investigating it. That’s highly suspicious. Maybe it was them. But stop pretending it’s a proven fact.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@InspGadgetBlogs ‘Suggests’

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@GBNEWS You are importing and encouraging division every single day.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@ClimateWarrior7 Absolutely and there should be a push to get those supportive of mass uncontrolled migration to volunteer their spare rooms. No hotels, no HMO’s - surely there is no reason at all why this can’t be solved. Other than hypocrisy of course.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@jameschappers So what power does Barnier have to make this so? Is he the dictator of Europe? You deceive as usual - pretending it’s as simple as one man saying a thing. You’re just so dishonest about everything, all the time.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@SheronWilkie Maybe because no one wants anyone with to start digging into this - the story is ‘Russia did it - move on quickly’. Maybe Russia did do it, they are certainly a bad actor - although it’s a curiously odd thing for them to do isn’t it? To what end? Best just to move on perhaps? 🤔

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@InspGadgetBlogs Slightly unusual though - they knew this was the likely PM and LibDems and Greens went Labour to ensure Reform didn’t win. Perhaps that would be replicated across the country, though it seems unlikely. I think you’re reading far too much into this one result.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@ReillyCusick @MaxEaglestone @SeddSezz No - ‘it was just a mistake’ is the standard excuse politicians use to launder a lie. It’s effective precisely because it gives their supporters, who are eager to believe them, an easy way to convince themselves it wasn’t intentional. The man is clearly a liar.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@MaxEaglestone @SeddSezz No, it’s politicians that use the ‘wrong words’, they are far far worse than simple liars.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@SKenup72083 @japan_nobunaga This is a massive problem for the UK - masses of dual passport holders who have an escape route and little interest in the UK beyond stripping it of whatever they can. The rest of us have one country and we need it to survive. Dual citizenship should not be allowed - choose.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@japan_nobunaga Because they don’t want to close it and never had any intention of closing it. They’re liars.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@FellTolla @GBNEWS You think you live in a democracy? You don’t, ‘democracy’ is just the skin suit they wear to justify their rule. Britain is a basket case, and Burnham is just the next nail in its coffin.

[BanksyCat @Banksycat]

UNBELIEVABLE. Your entire life sold to a billionaire and you never got a vote. DIGITAL ID. Blair brokered it, the King read it out like a shopping list, and 2.96 million of you signed a petition begging them not to. They read it, smiled, and did it anyway.

Here’s this COCKY IDIOT, smirking down the camera, telling you it's only what he was elected to do. The sheer NERVE.

They tried to force this in 2006 and the country threw it back. So they got clever. You don't force a leash on a country, you call it child safety and let them clip it on themselves. Optional, they say. Until the bank needs it. Until the job needs it. Until you can't buy milk without it. Optional the way a cliff edge is optional.

Embedded so deep that pulling it out takes the whole system down. Surviving every election. Every Prime Minister. Every one of you who never agreed to a word of it.

That's not a service. It's a LEASH. Heavy surveillance with a friendly logo, built to watch you, price you, and switch you off the second you say the wrong thing. Once it turns, it never turns back.

Now watch him smirk through it. FIVE times he stood there and said it's not possible. FIVE. Like a parrot that learned one phrase and mistook it for genius, reciting his greatest hits to a country that stopped clapping months ago, taking a bow in an empty theatre.

Wrong every time, he sneers. No, sunshine. Wrong about the boats. The bills. The borders. The only thing he's right about is how much he adores the sound of his own voice telling you he's right.

Watch what he's smirking THROUGH. The most despised Prime Minister this country has ever recorded. Ministers bolting for the door. MPs begging him to leave. A man waist deep in his own wreckage, straightening his tie for the cameras.

He was elected to serve this country. Not gift-wrap your private life and post it to the highest bidder who filled Blair's pockets fastest.

A landslide, he calls it. Won on barely a third of the vote, the emptiest mandate in living memory, worn like a crown God lowered onto his head.

Biggest NHS drop in 17 years, he beams. For ONE month. While 7.3 million still rot on the list.

Highest growth in the G7, he says. For ONE quarter. The next month it shrank. Funny how he forgot that bit.

Then everything he left off the brochure. TEN things not one of you voted for. Not one in his manifesto.

Winter fuel torn off ten million pensioners. Biggest tax raid since 1993. The thresholds Reeves swore she'd never freeze, frozen. Energy bills up after he promised cuts. The family farm tax. WASPI women promised the earth, handed a shrug. Grooming inquiry sat on six months. Post offices for the chop. Chagos given away.

And the tenth, buried deepest. Digital ID, held up behind the children like a human shield, because who argues with protecting kids. Then they vote to come for your VPN, the one tool that let you slip the net, and bolt the last door behind you.

Here's the punchline that should make your blood boil. Australia tried this exact ban. Months later the children strolled straight through it. It didn't protect ONE child. It was never built to. The children were never the point. The contract was.

Blair gets richer. Ellison gets richer. Then they plug it into Europe so the same machine prints money across a continent. Every regime that ever pulled this used the same excuse. China. Russia. North Korea. Protect the people. Then own them.

The children were never the target. They were the costume. You were never protected. You were harvested, and told to say thank you.

So watch him smirk and call it a mandate. It was never a mandate. It's the biggest robbery in plain sight this country has ever seen, dressed up as the will of the people and sold back to you as kindness.

Once it turns, it never turns back.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The EU Acted. Hungary Acted. The US Acted. Britain Signed Hotel Contracts Until 2039.

Yesterday the European Parliament voted 418 to 218 to pass the strictest returns legislation in EU history. The lead negotiator described it as the final missing piece of Europe's migration system. After almost twenty years of standstill, he said, Europe finally has effective return measures. The vote followed the Chișinău Declaration of 15 May, signed by all 46 Council of Europe member states, pushing back against the European Court of Human Rights' increasingly expansive interpretation of migration law. Europe's governments, operating inside the ECHR framework, have decided they have had enough of judicial overreach. They are acting anyway.

Britain's removal rate for illegal arrivals stands at 4%. The EU's removal rate, the number so catastrophically low it triggered yesterday's emergency legislation, stands at 20%. Britain is removing at one fifth the rate of a system the EU itself just declared broken beyond tolerance. While announcing it wants to stop the boats, the Home Office has signed accommodation contracts for asylum seekers running until 2039. A government that intends to remove people does not contract for 15 years of housing them.

The standard explanation is the ECHR. Ministers have cited it for years as the primary obstacle to removal, the external constraint that ties Britain's hands regardless of political will. It is worth examining that claim against the Court's own published data. Of more than 430,000 applications processed by the ECHR in the past decade, fewer than 2% concerned immigration. Of those, over 92% were dismissed. Fewer than 450 cases, one in every thousand applications to the Court, resulted in a finding of human rights violation on immigration grounds.

The obstacle is not in Strasbourg. It is in Chancery Lane. The domestic immigration tribunal system, staffed in part by judges whose documented backgrounds lie in open-borders advocacy, produces rulings that no democratically elected parliament ever intended and that the ECHR itself would not require. And the institutional machinery surrounding it ensures that challenging any of this carries consequences. A new Islamophobia definition, opposed by the government's own former anti-extremism adviser and by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is being embedded across every school, hospital, broadcaster and public body in the country. Two-tier policing, documented in Hampshire's own Race Action Plan and in the College of Policing's guidance, conditions officers to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. The framework does not just permit the embedding of mass migration. It is designed to make objecting to it a disciplinary matter.

The EU has now demonstrated, within the ECHR framework, that effective returns legislation is achievable. Hungary has demonstrated that a 4% removal rate is a political choice, not a legal inevitability. The United States has demonstrated that border crossings can be reduced from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government deciding to act. Every external constraint Britain's government cites as the reason it cannot act has now been dismantled by other governments operating under comparable or identical legal obligations.

Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years, maintained by an institutional framework that classifies concern about it as extremism, and defended by a legal excuse that the EU just voted 418 to 218 to stop hiding behind.

The smugglers did not build this system. The government did. Yesterday, 418 members of the European Parliament decided they had had enough of pretending otherwise. Britain's government has not.

"Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years"

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@FonsiLoaiza You people are mentally ill, you have an obsession with judging everything through this distorted twentieth century lens - even though you are both historically and politically illiterate about what a Fascist or a Nazi even is. You have had this done to you - it’s tragic.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@JacobCollierMP There is something a bit murky about it though isn’t there? Everyone saying it was Russia is speculating. It might have been, it might even be the most likely explanation - but let’s not pretend that it has been investigated and confirmed. Which is odd.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@LBC @EdwardJDavey Is he serious? Race has been in our politics for decades - Ed is always on about it, he just doesn’t like anyone with opposing views to his is all this is.

[Robert Pramston @RPramston]

@ollieparrot @ThePosieParker Interesting - I have to say I fell for this hook, line and sinker. It’s been repeated so often, I took it as a proven fact. Is there anything that they won’t lie about? I really don’t think so.