@simonmaechling The fact that you think anyone with an idea outside of your thinking or scientific practice is stupid,is the reason they will always be around. you don’t need to confirm what is correct,so you don’t need to label people. you are the cause,they react to,which is ironically stupid.
@alexboge The basic phycology of your posts isn’t debunking,its naming & re-framing. You create a label or a movement,give them both a name, and then any sceptic of any sort is simply popped into the appropriate group in the hope that no individual will be taken serious due to the label.
@johncoonsports your post was in my newsfeed and i don’t know who you are, but i do hope you have support around you.Its a horrible thing to experience.
@alexboge This is a massive deviation from my post. I really don’t care about people selling products online.sell whatever you like,im not buying.Its everyone s personally responsibility to work data out. i asked who was in charge of the anti-vax movement,and what is there aim?
sell drugs?
@askaya you don’t get to be both
which would be needed, and to be experienced to properly answer the question.
as it stands: Men & women are very different and their problems are unique to the sex they were born.
@alexboge I dont buy or promote the sale of ivermectin for anything Alex. You highlight the problem for me.Its your paranoia for what you perceive this movement is, and its your push to tell me how i think, and behave without ever asking.Thats what you accuse non scientific people of doing
@GodlyAction Someone s version of bad will always exist. Its not about prevention or making things illegal, its about not participating in what you consider the problem to be. You don’t have to look at porn,give women unwanted babies, or marry gay people.
@robster12065612 Fresh scientific data reports that the covid vaccines may reduce brain tumours, and cancer. Who knew that? the makers certainly didn’t, or they would have said,and there for if you don’t know what it can do, then you cant know what it does, or may do. To find out is experimental.
@simonmaechling Old argument you have thrown out a few times now. Trust is generally a given,until such times when it has been broken.The best way to keep peoples trust in experts low, is to keep telling them how wrong they are. A job you do well. No lies = no explanation required.Truth is truth
@DrNeilStone (1) The telephone.Try ringing for help without one
(2) Corrected wired electrical goods
(3) Brakes on vehicles
(4) Purification of water
(5) adequate sewerage system.
@DrNeilStone Old argument you have thrown out a few times now.
Trust is generally a given,until such times when it has been broken. The best way keep peoples trust in experts low, is to keep telling them how wrong they are. A job you do well. No lies = no explanation required.Truth is truth.
@ScienceNews Is this the closest these vaccine makers get to saying it has effects they they did not know about. What a worry that no one taking it, took it to prevent cancer,and what a coincidence, that when it caused so many side effects that this should now emerge.